In post 2073, Bellaphant wrote:If I'm scum with Isis we just vote RFs here, why would I be bothering to dive in hoops' iso or do wagon analysis?
Because that gets one or both of you lynched tomorrow, and from there the game falls apart.
For the theoretical scum!bella+Isis that is.
So what you need, is to keep your distance for one more day, but start to soften your other reads to justify the winning lynch tomorrow.
Which is also why I pointed it out - you reacting this strongly when N_M (one of the "wildcards") has voted for Isis and gera has just mentioned their soft scumread on Isis again makes me reach for my tinfoil.
In post 2073, Bellaphant wrote:You can't see all my quotes and say I'm making up connections. Try and find them for other people.
You also have to KNOW that most of those connections, and ESPECIALLY Hooplas
VERY
soft push on you..they all came out after they had claimed their bullshit.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again.
Anything and everything she said after that claim has been WIFOM.
She KNEW she wasn't getting away with that claim, and she made it as a gambit, obviously.
To buy some time, to lay down some chips.
You should know this.
In post 2075, Bellaphant wrote:You seem quite cross about me re-assesing the game state one day before potential lylo
No, I'm trying to understand your thought process here.