VOTE: Yeet
Why was there such a long delay? What did you do?
VOTE: Yeet
Sounds a little far fetched!In post 10, Yeet wrote:My account name of “maozedong” was not accepted by the mods, so they told me to change the name of my account.
I'm not joking! I think your slot is a scum power role who is required to be present or the game risks becoming mechanically unfair to the scum team.In post 14, Yeet wrote:Ah, yeah I will have to do that at some point. I’m currently on my phone in bed but I will do that the next time I get to a computer (will probably be tomorrow evening after work).
In post 22, skitter30 wrote:What are you implying / was your initial vote serious?In post 12, Frogsterking wrote:Sounds a little far fetched!In post 10, Yeet wrote:My account name of “maozedong” was not accepted by the mods, so they told me to change the name of my account.
I'm being serious I think the setup was delayed because it's balanced mechanically around a very powerful scum power role and the player who got this role never confirmed!In post 24, Frogsterking wrote:I'm not joking! I think your slot is a scum power role who is required to be present or the game risks becoming mechanically unfair to the scum team.In post 14, Yeet wrote:Ah, yeah I will have to do that at some point. I’m currently on my phone in bed but I will do that the next time I get to a computer (will probably be tomorrow evening after work).
In post 25, Yeet wrote:Indeed I am saddened as well. However both he and the current leader of China are very controversial figures, so I understand the sentiment behind the sanction.
Now I'm worried that Fool is a role in large normals?In post 27, Yeet wrote:I suspect that Frogsterking is aligned with the town.
42 fireisred trying to shut down scumhunting during start of day notedIn post 42, fireisredsir wrote:VOTE: frogsterking for making the first thread of serious conversation in this game be a really dumb one
Okay can you elaborate?In post 49, tenebrousluminary wrote:Salutations. Yeet and any others whom it may concern, you may call me teneb or tl if that is easier. I also respond to "hey you."
I would like to think that the game delay is notsomething we should read into, so I won't.
It's non game related for TOWN because it doesn't help with scumhunting, I think it's believable you and Dats +town my entrance so I'm not objecting to it OR returning you or Dats +town back because it could just be a pocket attempt from you.In post 52, skitter30 wrote:What? How are they depressing non-game topics and do you object to me/dats saying your entrance was +town and why is shading their slow unironically scummy (and i'm not sure they were even shading their slot either ...)In post 40, Frogsterking wrote:Yeet is talking about depressing non-game related topics and is townreading me despite doing nothing but instantly shading their slot unironically at start of game.
~
not sure i like 42
How could you know this?In post 66, Yeet wrote:I can guarantee at least one scum has posted.
YesIn post 86, GeneralWu wrote:The forum software this website uses is pretty old, right?
Shade or curious?In post 87, fireisredsir wrote:why does frogster sound so NEW, it's weird vibes for a 2011 join date
Okay so in 71 I'm saying I would often consider anyone approaching me the way you did like "hey me and this other person think you're +town" to be a scumtell and reject the read. The way you asked me just now in 52 seems so believable I'm not scumreading you for it AND still I'm too cynical of being pocketed to even give you a potential town lean for it.In post 83, skitter30 wrote:After readinf 71 multiple times, i actually dont think i got any clarity from it >.>
Why is it more believeable that me/dats would townbin you than for yeet to do the same thing?
~
Nai = non alignment indicative
In other words i'm saying what dats has done thus far is neither townie nor scummy for him
Okay I understand now, I think you're scumhunting because you already followed up by checking my # games playedIn post 101, fireisredsir wrote:no offense meant, new isn't bad. but when the way you are approaching and interacting with the game doesn't line up with how i would think an experienced player would, it could be cause you feel awkward and have trouble engaging genuinely as maf.In post 91, Frogsterking wrote:Shade or curious?In post 87, fireisredsir wrote:why does frogster sound so NEW, it's weird vibes for a 2011 join date
but on the other hand, if you are more new (and looks like you don't have a ton of games played actually) then it makes you make more sense to me
136 noted for being potentially a town tell, a scum tell, or both!In post 136, GeneralWu wrote:Maybe she just thought that other players would see the same things she did, but it turned out that they didn't.In post 131, Yeet wrote:The point was not that she suggested his posts are NAI - that is what I expect town skitter to do. And I’m sure she knew that part, regardless of what her alignment is. The point is that she started it with disbelief that he was getting pressure from players who don’t know him, knowing full well that she is using her experience with Datisi to sort him.In post 125, GeneralWu wrote:I don't think skitter is scummy for saying what she did about Datisi.
It sounds pretty normal to me. While not everyone here is completely familiar with Datisi's playstyle, I don't think it's scummy for skitter to suggest that Datisi's posts are NAI.
She saw an opportunity to make a read (fake content) that she would as town and slipped up in how she presented it.
..In post 158, skitter30 wrote:I dont really understand any of this either ...In post 135, Frogsterking wrote:Okay so in 71 I'm saying I would often consider anyone approaching me the way you did like "hey me and this other person think you're +town" to be a scumtell and reject the read. The way you asked me just now in 52 seems so believable I'm not scumreading you for it AND still I'm too cynical of being pocketed to even give you a potential town lean for it.
I just noticed in 52 you also asked why Yeet is unironically scummy for townreading me despite my only actions being to shade Yeet. I don't know how to answer that other than that I don't think it's a very believable/common reaction from a townie for Yeet to play like that?
I think 136 and 163 are more likely to come from town because they're unassuming and open up lines of discussion!In post 183, GeneralWu wrote:DangIn post 178, Frogsterking wrote:Okay following 163 I feel compelled to share wu is a townlean for me unironically.
Well folks, I think my work here is done.
How did you conclude that
Huh do you mind elaborating why maf have more motivation to make friends than town? I'm going for a walk but I'll be back soon.In post 197, fireisredsir wrote:163 is not towny, fluff is not discussion. i don't think it's very scummy either but maf has more motivation to try to make friends than town doesIn post 194, Frogsterking wrote:I think 136 and 163 are more likely to come from town because they're unassuming and open up lines of discussion!In post 183, GeneralWu wrote:DangIn post 178, Frogsterking wrote:Okay following 163 I feel compelled to share wu is a townlean for me unironically.
Well folks, I think my work here is done.
How did you conclude that
I don't know about irl, but I replaced out of a game (which is now completed) where they both made this kind of shitposting as Town.In post 205, GeneralWu wrote:Do Aristeia and Datisi know each other in person?
Yeah this is something I was planning to follow up with you on once I finally got caught upIn post 1149, fireisredsir wrote:in the flurry of early posts, while participating in them live i kinda mentally binned yeet as new and confident and that i would probably disagree with a lot of his takes because of it, but that he seemed towny enough. looking back at the ISO now though, im less sold on that. agreed that the sequence malcolm pointed out was bad
Are you talking about Yeet?In post 1151, Datisi wrote:not to play the devil's advocate or anything, but i don't think "this person is the most suspected, also they need more" is like, an actual contradiction or a problem
i do have issues with other parts of his play but you know
Nah I prefer fua + Yeet
I think there's a good chance of either that or the higher player volume causing the wagons to feel like they have more resistance. I think your wagon looks like any other limbait wagon and has a low chance of flipping scum.In post 1158, GeneralWu wrote:I kinda have this feeling that there might be scum defending me for free towncred.
I agree with this I remember seeing the size of the Wu wagon fluctuate a lot and always return.In post 1166, MalcolmTucker wrote:I don't have any posts to hand but there's definitely been a couple of posts who have been less keen on a Wu vote at this stage. Nobody is exactly mounting a huge defence but then suspicion of him has been sporadic - if still fairly consistent - anyway for the most part.In post 1159, fireisredsir wrote:who is even defending you
Okay who?In post 1737, fireisredsir wrote:you shouldn't be townreading for effort in general, we have some very effort-maf players in this gameIn post 1729, Frogsterking wrote:1711 town reading fire now. I had this slot as a town lean for a long time. I'm not sure about the accuracy of 1711 but I don't think this effort comes from scum.
Yeah I've heard that about them too! The only completed game I played with them before they were both town so I can't confirm or deny. I still think you're probably town.In post 1761, fireisredsir wrote:p sure skitter and datisi both have that reputation but i could be wrong on that cause ive never played with them, just read someIn post 1746, Frogsterking wrote:Okay who?In post 1737, fireisredsir wrote:you shouldn't be townreading for effort in general, we have some very effort-maf players in this gameIn post 1729, Frogsterking wrote:1711 town reading fire now. I had this slot as a town lean for a long time. I'm not sure about the accuracy of 1711 but I don't think this effort comes from scum.
I'm skipping all the posts involving Nordom/MathBlade or Ari arguing with someone.In post 1772, VP Baltar wrote:I thought I was going to be able to catch up to the 9 pages added overnight, but then I had two hours of work to do and there were six more pages added. I'm at page 65 currently and it is almost entirely Math saying shit that literally no one agrees with and insisting he is right.
Like, Math, can we please not do this again in this game? You've stated your viewpoint, we got it. All we need to be doing at this point is flipping Wu and getting some actual information.
I do think there is another small pool of people we can scumhunt in, but flipping Wu first should be a priority.
pedit - fuck me there are like 12 posts in the time it took me to write this.
Can you look at the interactions at the beginning of my iso (daystart) and say which reads you agree/disagree with and why?In post 1783, Scorpious wrote:I got a late start on this on and there is a lot of activity, not an excuse,buy again I can't argue I havent done much.In post 1779, Scorpious wrote:oof, I really haven't. fair assessment, I'll try to step it up..In post 1748, Datisi wrote:scorpious, do you have a single read this game or are you just gonna throw unhelpful posts
Yes dude I think Wu is just limbait. Your insistence on pushing Wu earlier was the main reason I FoSed you.In post 1789, fua wrote:Ari wagon is almost certainly pure IMO. I'm less confident that Wu's is and so many people pushing him now that others are getting suspicion makes me wary.
My experience with Ari has been that she is generally an unthoughtful townie.In post 1802, fua wrote:If Ari is town she would be putting more thought into the game than just tackling low-hanging limbait.
Yeah kinda I think it's not the best callIn post 1814, VP Baltar wrote:You that opposed to the wu yeet?In post 1800, Frogsterking wrote:PSA: If a pure wagon is what you're looking for then please take notice of my Yeet wagon. Thank you.
Can you elaborate on how you narrowed that down please?In post 1826, Scorpious wrote:Using the KISS method and narrowing it down . I would favor an ari launch over a Wu launch.
Yeah I have to say I think Nero is probably town this gameIn post 1845, Nero Cain wrote:she voted Scorp for ???? reason. You attacking me for voting Ari has shit all to do with her.
You're pulling me around to the ideaIn post 1855, Nero Cain wrote:Why can't Ari just be like ya know, scum that ploped down a vote on a somewhat EZ to wagon player in an attempt to save herself b/c you know he's EZ?
In post 1790, Frogsterking wrote:Can you look at the interactions at the beginning of my iso (daystart) and say which reads you agree/disagree with and why?In post 1783, Scorpious wrote:I got a late start on this on and there is a lot of activity, not an excuse,buy again I can't argue I havent done much.In post 1779, Scorpious wrote:oof, I really haven't. fair assessment, I'll try to step it up..In post 1748, Datisi wrote:scorpious, do you have a single read this game or are you just gonna throw unhelpful posts
Hey Scorpius I asked you these questions and I want you to answer because you're pretty low infoIn post 1828, Frogsterking wrote:Can you elaborate on how you narrowed that down please?In post 1826, Scorpious wrote:Using the KISS method and narrowing it down . I would favor an ari launch over a Wu launch.
Hmm the joint probability of both masons being wagoned does seem pretty low. I can try to figure out the probability of that.In post 1947, MathBlade wrote:I have to work now lunch break is over. I came in and the VCs were both on me and Monkey. This doesn’t “just happen” that two masons are wagoned. Means scum likely knew who we were already.In post 1943, Frogsterking wrote:Hey Math can you elaborate on what you discovered during the VCA you did on replace in?
Means scum deviated intentionally to us means scum on the wagons.
Players deviated from Datisi and Wu to me and HEM
(Before Fite complains there’s some intermediary steps which fire highlights)
But the gist is to find that why.
I would do it though to be fairIn post 1948, Datisi wrote:is it just me or is like, purposefully wagoning someone you know is a mason a HORRIBLE scum strategy? >_>In post 1947, MathBlade wrote:Means scum likely knew who we were already.
In post 1874, fua wrote:Nope.In post 1871, Aristeia wrote:you SR me for pushing him.In post 1868, fua wrote:Not necessarily, but it’s FoS because I SR you and you’re pushing him.In post 1863, Aristeia wrote:LHF implies town alignment and I don't really see how you're making that determination.In post 1860, fua wrote:Scorp is someone who won’t defend himself and as you said, is a low poster/not participating. It’s uncontroversial LHF.
you townread him because you SR me.
isn't that just circular logic?
I didn't like fua's early posts or their recent posts here eitherIn post 1896, fua wrote:Ari’s wagon is pure though.
I don't see the read progression for fua to townread all of the Ari wagon, I don't think fua's FoS of Fire is very believable and I think fua is blending by dogpiling Ari.In post 1964, VP Baltar wrote:can you expand on what you didn't like? What specifically?In post 1961, Frogsterking wrote:I didn't like fua's early posts or their recent posts here either
In post 2061, fua wrote:I claim PR. You can all now feel free to get off of me.
Fire or Skitter should probably die today. I wouldn’t be opposed to Wu, but it feels like a waste right now.
In post 2064, fua wrote:Try it and you’ll catch my vig bullet in the face tonight. No, really. Make mu day.
In post 2068, fua wrote:Ari is also scum, but a little less likely than the other two. Maybe she really did just make a bad push.In post 2063, MathBlade wrote:What about Ari?In post 2061, fua wrote:I claim PR. You can all now feel free to get off of me.
Fire or Skitter should probably die today. I wouldn’t be opposed to Wu, but it feels like a waste right now.
This is really townie UNVOTE: fuaIn post 2070, fua wrote:If anyone else wants to claim vigilante then feel free.
I mean I've been wanting Yeet wagon all day. VOTE: YeetIn post 2122, fua wrote:Shitlist is Skitter, Wu, Ari’s slot, Fire, Yeet, and possibly Tenebro for now. Subject to change later, and doesn’t include Eyes or Scorpious because they’re not worth pursuing at the moment.In post 2116, humaneatingmonkey wrote:fua, what are your reads? doesn't have to be a list, just walk me through who's on your shitlist.
Are you tempted by a Yeet wagon?In post 2190, humaneatingmonkey wrote:hmm
I thought wu was townier in the daystart trying to get conversation going, i feel like wu is being wagoned because of a temperamental difference as much as anything. Wu also adds to the lightness of the table which is important to sustain motivation for us going forward.In post 2193, humaneatingmonkey wrote:why yeet and not wu