I think having it public so the person can understand why and both sides are shown and there is actual rational reason for the person being disallowed is the right way to do it no ifs or buts about it who cares about feelings you have to be real.In post 16, Rylai and Lina wrote:The people who are voting yes to out someone must be known. Its lame to vote for WOTC'ing someone without telling them. Its not ok with any standards.In post 14, Aristophanes wrote:In this model it is made public if the Mod feels it a necessary thing to enforce, so the players can decide and the WOTC'd knows it's happening.
I
Maybe someone else can actually give some history on WOTC and how it was beneficial or not. (With stats on who was WOTC'd out of there that deserved it vs those that did not deserve it)
---
@Frozen Angel: I don't think it's rude. It seems more vague so it's hard to tell if it's on dislike or constructive dislike. (This person lurked to infinity, etc) If this were made public and there was a valid reason to disallow a person to join then it'd probably be less rude but more constructive so that player could improve.