Application of WOTC

Papa Zito · Post Post #50 (isolation #0) » Tue Oct 04, 2016 10:26 am

In post 42, Frozen Angel wrote:I am just saying you need to be decent enough to talk about your issues with the person you have issues with before using any enforcement methods

I'm not sure why you're assuming this hasn't happened in virtually every case.

These things don't happen in a vacuum.

Papa Zito · Post Post #57 (isolation #1) » Tue Oct 04, 2016 10:52 am

In post 54, Raskolnikov wrote:The solution is for everyone to publicly out who they want to WOTC, then compile big aggregate lists from that and use the results as a second speakeasy popularity contest.

We had this and then they had to go and close Forum62

Papa Zito · Post Post #74 (isolation #2) » Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:26 pm

What if you already did all that previously.

And then they join a game you're already in anyway.

I know this is purely hypothetical and NEVER EVER happens but indulge me.

Papa Zito · Post Post #109 (isolation #3) » Fri Oct 07, 2016 2:13 am

good lord almighty

there are people on here who have proven time and again to be useless, or flakey, or a chronic lurker, or toxic, or whatever. Generally Unfun To Play With.

Players in queue seeing one of those people joining a game and PMing the mod to say "hey that guy's a jerk can you not let him in" isn't some kind of massive evil corporate conspiracy, it's people who don't want a crappy person shitting up their game.

The End

Papa Zito · Post Post #118 (isolation #4) » Sat Oct 08, 2016 3:19 am

In post 114, Frozen Angel wrote: its wrong becuase :
(1)- the reasons never got public
(2)- player b dont know who are the accusers
(3)- players c and d had no sirious issues with player b before mod ask them anout it.

1. Two things here - why do you support public shaming and also who ever said that Player B has some constitutional right to know these reasons?
2. See #1. There are also some people who would prefer to just

play mafia games on a mafia site

and not get bogged down in useless drama. Weird right.
3. Sounds like C and D did have serious issues since they PMed the mod about it. :3

THE POINT IS that after your scenario is finished the moderator has a better playerlist which likely leads to a better game. I dunno about you but I for one am all about better games. hooray

Papa Zito · Post Post #120 (isolation #5) » Sat Oct 08, 2016 3:59 am

This isn't the Hague ffs, there's no court or criminal procedure or cases or "rights" or anything. it's just people who want to play mafia games and have fun.

You are

once again

assuming these people haven't been told time and again that they're toxic of what have you. By and large they are well aware of their reputation.

Papa Zito · Post Post #239 (isolation #6) » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:47 am

oh my god

Papa Zito · Post Post #241 (isolation #7) » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:54 am

In post 225, Yume wrote:We can take criticism. What we cannot take is someone acting like king of the world.

is this the royal we or something

Papa Zito · Post Post #259 (isolation #8) » Mon Oct 10, 2016 5:58 am

can we at least not make this about one particular individual

Papa Zito · Post Post #261 (isolation #9) » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:08 am

I mean that's fair but we were doing so well

Papa Zito · Post Post #529 (isolation #10) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:11 am

oh god not again

Papa Zito · Post Post #586 (isolation #11) » Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:33 am

Keep fighting the good fight Yume.

Papa Zito · Post Post #626 (isolation #12) » Thu Mar 30, 2017 5:27 am

In post 621, Yume wrote:That's why the site in general is the problem.

It's definitely everyone else.