Newbie 2068 | Lofi Beats to Play Mafia To | Game Over
Forum rules
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Hm. As an SE, I find it surprising you'd open with this. Why not a random vote, or some questions to get the ball rolling?
I was curious and looked through some of your threads, of the ones that I checked, this is the only one with this type of opening. What made the cook decide to spice up the meal today?
True, but it's worth seeing your responseIn post 43, T3 wrote:
I appreciate the sentiment but I sincerely doubt anyone can form an actual meta read on page 2.In post 37, Zyla wrote:Unless T3 improved a lot from the last time we played, he doesn't look like scum based on his meta. That said, I'm not ruling him out entirely since meta does change over time, but we'll see!- Zyla
-
Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
True, but it's one of two options I know of to get the ball rolling. If you don't like RVS, how would you prefer town getting conversation going?In post 67, VFP wrote:RVS sucks- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
No, no, James is right, No Elims are strictly bad for town in the majority of situations, from everything I've read, they're
onlygood with an even number of players (Such as the day after the JK jails the NK actor or victim, Doc heals the victim, or mafia refrains)
We have 9 players, 7 Town, 2 Mafia. ELo is hit when we have 3/4 Town and 2 Mafia or 2/3 Town and 1 Mafia left.
Assuming that Mafia is able to pull off the NK every night, that means that the possibilities for hitting 3 or 4 town at 2 mafia is limited to NoElim NK, MisElim NK, (4 town) or MisElim NK, MisElim NK (3 Town). If we no-elim, we only haveonechance to get our elimination wrong and still win the game, but if we vote for someone, even at random, we have achanceof hitting scum, still one mis-elim left, and gather information along the way.
tl;drnever vote no Elim unless there's aspecificreason for it- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
That's quite interesting, considering I haven't even found a game of yours that had a D1 No Lim. I guess you're 0for0 instead of 7for7In post 78, VFP wrote:I have never lost a game with a D1 no lim on here.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Alright, I'm going to try to condense the "No Lim" convo so far.
Here's the original post, they posted a vote for no lim. They could be posting it as a joke, they could seriously be not wanting an elimination day 1, this might be their way of getting the ball rolling. (If the last one, mad props my friend, as it certainly worked) I don't know why they posted it, which is why I pointed it out so I could figure out the purpose of it.
In post 44, Zyla wrote:Hm. As [you are] an SE, I find it surprising you'd open with this. Why not a random vote, or some questions to get the ball rolling?
I'll be honest, I completely missed this post the first time around. Unfortunately I'm not really sure what they mean with the part past '[nothing] scum motivated', so I don't have a responseIn post 57, VFP wrote:Zyla maybe town, I don't see anything scum motivated to point out the no lim and as an experienced player probably just isn't used to this.
In post 78, VFP wrote:I have never lost a game with a D1 no lim on here.Hereis where it goes from "what's the meaning of your vote?" to scum reading.
Why are they saying that they never lost a game that they've never played? (And if I missed the one where it did, why are they treating 1 or 2 as a rule?)In post 80, Zyla wrote:That's quite interesting, considering I haven't even found a game of yours that had a D1 No Lim. I guess you're 0for0 instead of 7for7
This part is true, and again, if this was VFP's point, props to them.In post 87, GrandpaMo wrote:
This is very very ironic because a No Lim has caused this conversation to get started and maybe get a read on you and maybe see interactions with other people. This is why I pointed you out earlier.In post 68, Zyla wrote:
True, but it's one of two options I know of to get the ball rolling. If you don't like RVS, how would you prefer town getting conversation going?In post 67, VFP wrote:RVS sucks
I lied.
Then there's this. I'm not sure if I'm somehow not understanding a couple of sentences in there or something, but I don't follow the logic at all. Frankly, this post just confuses me , and I'm struggling to understand where his scum read is coming from.Yes, I lied to you, it wasn't just because I pointed it out to say "it was funny", I pointed it out because I knew this was going to happen, and you weren't going to realize it after questioning hence why I had to lie so I can drop it off. But since, it has escalated ever since, the only reason this conversation happened was because VFP did a no lim. It's really NAI, and it seems like you are trying to set him up as scum for it. Yes, maybe he could be scum however, this is something more of NAI in my opinion, and shouldn't be taken as a regard. Many people no lim on day 1 and many people vote on day 1.
We will all be voting regardless by day 1, so there is no point to continue this conversation. I thought you would stop because you would find it unnecessary and NAI to keep going about a specific vote, specifically a no lim.
But you didn't.
So I will give you scumpings for this. I don't fully scumread you because you initiating this conversation could be towny of you but the way you are handling it could be scummy of you if you understand.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Unfortunately, 2065 is not only my only scum game so far, but it was also my first game on sight, so tbh, scum meta won't be very helpful on me. 2064 I was town, but I replaced in into a rolling wagon on one of the scum and the next day was solved because of PRs rather than reads, so I'm not sure if that would be helpful for a town readIn post 100, alstroemerial wrote:Zyla: It just seems weird to me to dig in so hard on literally one of the first posts in the thread, during the RVS phase. Additionally, the hero solve on 89 was a combo of that digging-in with a healthy dose of OMGUS. However, I have a doubt that I'm struggling to articulate, which is that I read a game in which Zyla turned out to be scum, and this game feels different. I read that earlier game not knowing I'd be playing with Zyla again, so maybe I need to go back and take a closer look.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I feel like I could probably give Val some town points if Grandpa flips scum, but I'm not sure enough to give them the points without seeing grandpa flip.In post 124, alstroemerial wrote:Question forZylaregarding your Val read. Does your scum-lean on Grandpa make you think Val is more likely to be town, given all of the back and forth that they had? I ask partially because I have them as flipped. It doesn't read like scum v scum to me.
? If this is because I hadn't yet replied to the tiny red text in a quote, your tl;dr was actually not helpful to meIn post 130, GrandpaMo wrote:also sad how u and james dont wanna interact wit me right after just replying to u lmfao wit yall answers
Pedit: yep, that's what it was about
I found VFP's reasoning to be just enough to put them as townier than you, and I don't have any further questions for them right now, so I'm changing my vote to my scummier readIn post 131, GrandpaMo wrote:
wait what?In post 81, Zyla wrote:VOTE: VFP I don't like the fact that you seem to have chosen no-elims on D1 to be a hill you're willing to die on, nor the fact that you implied that you've won multiple games with a D1 no-elim when I can't find any examples
why the pivot?- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
If I'm not mistaken, the only legal way to take 74 is as a joke, otherwise I think it falls under a trust tell
@Mod, can I get confirmation on if I'm correct with that?
A) That's fine, we're different players, we look for different things, the important thing isn't that we read people the same, but that we work together
B) I had a gut feeling that he was town based on what I've seen of him before, in a game that we played and meta I read for that game (as that's what got him), it wasn't much to go off of, but I was curious to how he'd respond if I acted like it was clear cut evidence. I liked his response, which is where the actual town-lean comes from
C) I personally don't read anything scummy from his posts so far
D) Most of the time, I would rather sit back and try to get some information from the interaction than tell you to knock it off. I may step in if I see some logical inconsistencies, or if it causes a wagon to be started, but it's good to get the information I can
E) "Null" means "I see equal ways to read this person as town that I do to read them as scum", whereas "Not enough info" means "I don't have enough info to declare a read yet"- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I'm having trouble reconciling the fact that you're saying you wouldn't scum read for differing reads with the fact that that seems to be what your original post was saying in that section, but maybe I misunderstood something thereIn post 174, Val89 wrote:
I'm not expecting for our reads to match, and I don't scum read anyone purely for having different reads. I read VFP as leantown, and VFP reads you town, for example. I see VFPs explanation for it - that he considers a scum!Zyla would continue to prosecute the "no-lim" vote further than you did - and while I disagree with it, it seems a reasonable case for Town!VFP to make.In post 167, Zyla wrote: A) That's fine, we're different players, we look for different things, the important thing isn't that we read people the same, but that we work together
I thought I had shared my reasons for most people:On the other had, we have the exact opposite read on {T3, James, VFP and Grandpa}, and a different read on Cook, too - over fully half the field, and the essential difference is I can't game out the justifications you might have because you haven't shared them. I am aware the same applies to some of the other players also, and that's on my radar also.
T3 | 167 (B),
James | gut read,
VFP | 135,
Grandpa | 103
Like I said, it was originally a gut feeling, my reaction test was 37, and T3's reaction was 42
I'm reading your ISOs side by side, and I don't see it. Which post of his gave that feeling; which post of yours is the one where you act like its clear cut evidence, and which post does he give the response you like?In post 167, Zyla wrote: I had a gut feeling that he was town based on what I've seen of him before, in a game that we played and meta I read for that game (as that's what got him), it wasn't much to go off of, but I was curious to how he'd respond if I acted like it was clear cut evidence. I liked his response, which is where the actual town-lean comes from
This seems, on the surface, to be a reasonable explanation, so if you gave give me those links, I may well find some measure of ease there.
Actually, rereading Cook's ISO, I can't remember which posts gave me any vibes at all, NEI may have been a better spot for them
Fair enough. I can see that. What are your reasons for reading scum!Cook, and what are those for town!Cook?In post 167, Zyla wrote: "Null" means "I see equal ways to read this person as town that I do to read them as scum", whereas "Not enough info" means "I don't have enough info to declare a read yet"
Hm. I hadn't noticed that yet, I'm still leaning town on James, but I'll be watching for sureIn post 179, Val89 wrote:
Can someone just take a moment to look at the combined ISO for James and Zyla and identify where Zyla gives her reasons for voting Grandpa prior to James' #145?In post 145, JamesTheNames wrote:Not to mention there are different reasons for me and Zyla scumreading you.
I can't find it, and it's worrying me.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Now hold on here. I quotedIn post 195, Val89 wrote:
That'll be because you quoted the first part of my response, and not the follow up where I addresed that already.In post 184, Zyla wrote:I'm having trouble reconciling the fact that you're saying you wouldn't scum read for differing reads with the fact that that seems to be what your original post was saying in that sectioneverypart of your post and responded to it. It's not fair to imply that I didn't address the follow up when that was just the next paragraph.
You do not have enough justification to say that all my town reads are scum, maybe they read scummy toIn post 174, Val89 wrote:On the other had, we have the exact opposite read on {T3, James, VFP and Grandpa}, and a different read on Cook, too - over fully half the field, and the essential difference is I can't game out the justifications you might have because you haven't shared them. I am aware the same applies to some of the other players also, and that's on my radar also.
There's a slight difference between "we don't have the same reads" and "everyone you think is town is actually scum, and everyone you think is scum I think is town".you, but on day one, that's always going to be subjective. But even if our reads were exact opposites, and they're not quitethatdifferent, it's way too early to say that one of us has to be right. The scum team could be Mini and Alstro, and neither of us would've had a single correct scum read at this point!
You missed the option that I was thinking made the most sense, but I'll let James answer to see if I'm correct.
Hm indeed. It might have escaped your attention, but now you see James heavily implying you are communicating outside of thread, either a straight up scum slip, or else a scummy attempt to put words in your mouth and link you together, and your response is "still town though"?In post 184, Zyla wrote:Hm. I hadn't noticed that yet, I'm still leaning town on James, but I'll be watching for sure
James: what made you say that our reads were for different reasons?
Gut reads can be strong sometimes, he seems to be posting in the same way as our last game together, which to me is good, even if not conclusive. I will update my read as the game goes on, but for now, he is still leaning townI'm sorry, but if all I had was a 'gut read'; then even if you thought my argument around him being evasive in the James v Val interactions when he has demonstrated that he thinks that is anti-town were total BS, even if you think there is some town explaination for the "I don't like using meta in this game when it looks bad for me, but I thought was fine in my last town game when it helped find scum" line he is trying to slip past us, even if you couldn't follow Grandpa's arguments against James and wrote those off, and even if you buy James response to alstromerial's additional reason re: the tunneling comment, then I would have thought James trying to link you in such a manner would be reason enough alone to override a pure 'gut read'.
To your credit, however, I am satisfied with your response with regards to T3.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
? How is self-meta a towntell?In post 225, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
This is scum seeing T3 towntell and then getting mad because it's a "trust tell".In post 167, Zyla wrote:If I'm not mistaken, the only legal way to take 74 is as a joke, otherwise I think it falls under a trust tell
@Mod, can I get confirmation on if I'm correct with that?
VOTE: Zyla
How so? No-elims are bad for town and they seemed adamant to defend their vote as being a good one, with something that is onlyIn post 245, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Pushing someone for the reasoning of them: "wanting a no lim" looks really bad for you.In post 81, Zyla wrote:VOTE: VFP I don't like the fact that you seem to have chosen no-elims on D1 to be a hill you're willing to die on, nor the fact that you implied that you've won multiple games with a D1 no-elim when I can't find any examplestechnicallytrue. (Town has lost 0 out of their 0 games that started with a no-elim d1)
Also. It doesn't matter if you find a post boring, just read it- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
My point isn't that James is town or that you should believe it, my point is thatIn post 260, Val89 wrote:
I find the "trust me newb, he's town cos I ain't a newb and I know it" about as convincing as the "trust me, he's town cos I played a game with him before" argument we get from Zyla.In post 251, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You should vote Zyla.Ithink James is town - at the moment.
For the other part, I 100% think that "I'm the SE, so vote how I tell you" is bad form, although I haven't decided yet rather it's scummy, or someone who thinks they're better at this game than they are- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I don't know how else this post is supposed to be takenIn post 262, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Now you're just blatantly misrepping what i said to discredit me.In post 261, Zyla wrote:For the other part, I 100% think that "I'm the SE, so vote how I tell you" is bad form, although I haven't decided yet rather it's scummy, or someone who thinks they're better at this game than they are
I've brought up that i have experience, yes. And i used that as an added supplement for my argumentation. But most of my posting has been used to explain my reasoning for believing James to be more likely town than scum and i've also listened to Val's case and responded as to what i think. So to say that all i've done is say to vote with me because i'm the SE is plain wrong.In post 251, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Ok, newb.In post 249, Val89 wrote: "He's town because he gives no shits about doing this things he says town should do, I'm an SE slot you newb so trust me." I ain't buying that.
You should vote Zyla.In post 249, Val89 wrote: You buy his read on Grandpa as genuine? Zyla is the other one driving that wagon, and I agree she's likely flipping red here too.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
What makes it scummy?In post 269, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
- Your scummy voting pattern.In post 268, Zyla wrote:Also, don't tell us how to vote, tell uswhyto vote.
To paraphrase you: are you capable of summarizing what you've said about me into one easy to read post?
.. Something that's provably anti-town.- Pushing a slot for wanting no lim.
Read my very next post. I wasn't calling it a trust tell, I was saying it- Calling T3's post an trust tell and pestering mod about it.hadto be a joke.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
"NAI, could be scum, don't read over this, stop the conversation"In post 87, GrandpaMo wrote:So I will give you scumpings for this. I don't fully scumread you because you initiating this conversation could be towny of you but the way you are handling it could be scummy of you if you understand.Spoiler:
To me this just seems absurd, he seems to go back and forth and back in a single post, and tries to suggest the conversation should just end, when so far it's been pretty productive and getting people to talk.
I don't like that this is his best answer. Where in the conversation is the answer? How is it supposed to be found? If the person asking the question was able to find it, don't you think they would've just... not asked the question?In post 88, GrandpaMo wrote:Spoiler:
Look at the full context please. Smh. The answer you are looking for should be within the conversation. I will give you a hint; the reason relates to a misunderstanding we BOTH had. (I am assuming)
(I'm not entirely sure who the pronouns are referring to, but it doesn't really matter)In post 111, GrandpaMo wrote:Yea, that's why I said bad reaction because it was a weird omgus.Spoiler:I don't fully scumread you but you are like the only one who I see that could be possible scum.Also I agree with T3 and I do think your introduction is actually towny.
You did hit all the parts right. That was the main reason but it's also the way she ended up going with the convo -- just seemed like a way for scum to, I don't know, maybe drive a possible condemn? See this is why I give them scumpings not a full scumread because they could defeinitly be town for initiating the scumread or this convo -- which is has to be found, a very towny thing to do. So if that is the case (which will need to be decided later) then yea there is a chance for her to flip town.
If Grandpa doesn't scumread someone, how are they possible scum? That just doesn't make sense, could be just bad logic though.
Scumreading someone for going to sleep is just.. bad.In post 158, GrandpaMo wrote:Also, I very much dislike how James just left this conversation. This looks bad for you, James.
And then there's this. Why is he commenting saying that he's an easy vote?In post 256, GrandpaMo wrote:I think also I will townlean you for not straight up finding scum between me and James. I feel like scum would just try to get an easy vote off me or James.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
No. Unfortunately, I don't think I can trust myself to read you right now, because it feels like you're purposefully trying to be rude, and that's going to cause an emotional read rather than a logical one. My post was not saying "My point was shit", and I don't think itIn post 290, Val89 wrote:My point exactly, Zyla.
You may well feel like you can't leave it as two words which amount to "my point was shit" if you are scum, and your point was against someone you need to push as scum. Like, if anything in my case against you or James is just straight up crap based on a simple misunderstanding and another player comes along and points it out, I don't see an issue just saying "yeah, you are right, that's crap".
What's the reason you still don't like someone saying you are a scumlean, and the only scumlean they have so far? That it was Day 1? That they could change their mind later?
Incidentally, we have been interacting a fair bit of late. Have you enough information to make a read on me now?was. It's not that I don't like him saying "you are the only scumlean I have", it's that I don't like the fact that it read as "You aren't scummy, but you're the only possible scum" as I don't see how both parts of that can be true.
In response to Grandpa's 299, my post 277 was in response to NEE's 273. It was a scumcase on you, because I was specifically asked for one.In post 310, Val89 wrote:
Don't see anything wrong with that - it seems like a stretch to point to you talking about Norwee not jumping on either wagon and suggest that is scummy; but it seems equally weird to point to the fact she mentions the wagon on you and not the one on James to suggest they might be partners.In post 308, GrandpaMo wrote:what do u think about like the wall post that zyla posted of where i was saying i was an easy vote like look at post 299, last quote message
they only pointed out me and not james
There is enough floating about and I think weak arguments like this are just starting to cloud the issue.
Also, @NEE, you mentioned that you doubt one of those sentences comes from town. Which one?
Also, I'm going to go back to my original VOTE: VFP. They've posted almost nothing substantial this entire game, said they were going to vote someone at 317 and never followed through, and from reading a random sample of 3 of their town ISOs, I don't think it's just playstyle.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Honestly, looking back at it today with fresh eyes, I'm not as sure about it as I was. I was in a bad mood because of IRL stuff (which I didn't quite realize until 289) and I think I dug my heels into wet cement there. I'm gonna re-read the thread and see what I think thenIn post 360, Val89 wrote:Well, my #290 was predicated on that former interpretation. I rescind it.
I read you scummy for it because what I thought you were saying was "Yes, you are right,but[nonsensical follow up that was unnecessary and served only to have something to hang a but on]". I see now I was wrong about that.
The phrasing of "I don't fully scumread you but you are like the only one who I see that could be possible scum." is bit awkward for sure. You bought it up as point 3 of 5 is a list of "reasons why Zyla thinks Grandpa is scummy". I gave you my interpretation as to what I think he was trying to express. If you disagree, can you articulate why you consider this specific phrasing to be AI? Do you think it was deliberate in order to distract, or something?- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Not really. I was expecting that they would say that they understood my reads to be something based off of my posts, honestly if they had linked that exact post and said "I read her read on Grandpa to be OMGUS" I would've been fine with that. And looking back at my own ISO, I think that that's what I would've thought and said had I been Town!James.In post 365, Val89 wrote:
Zyla herself acknowledges you haven't explained what's going on here and asks for qualification in her #208, while suggesting there is a third alternative.In post 361, JamesTheNames wrote:Feel free not to read 184. Zyla here links to a post where she explained why she scum read Grandpa. Which is earlier than 145.Zyla, are you satisfied with James' responses, here?
I will note, that I still partially agree with my later reasoning for scumreading Grandpa, but honestly I'd put him at null-scum more than even a scum-lean if that makes sense.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
VFP: who were you planning on voting for in 317?
Val:why did you think James would hammer without announcing intent? And would that be coming from Town or Scum James?
T3: what do you think is the difference between how you and VFP have been playing this game?
T3 and Cook: the same question for both of you. Why do you think VFP is scummy?
Pedit:
Grandpa: why do you get to decide what votes are 'acceptable'?- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Could you point me to the points that I didn't answer?In post 449, GrandpaMo wrote:
since you asked us questions? why haven't you been able to answer / address my points that i made to you regarding that wall post that was full of manipulative reads.In post 446, Zyla wrote:VFP: who were you planning on voting for in 317?
Val:why did you think James would hammer without announcing intent? And would that be coming from Town or Scum James?
T3: what do you think is the difference between how you and VFP have been playing this game?
T3 and Cook: the same question for both of you. Why do you think VFP is scummy?
Pedit:
Grandpa: why do you get to decide what votes are 'acceptable'?- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Well, yes. NEE asked me to. Already addressed this in 355In post 299, GrandpaMo wrote:okay ill try my best to digest this info because im confused? are you like tryna reiterate a scumcase on me?
I have no idea what this means, apologies, could you try to rephrase it and I'll answer it if I can?Grandpa wrote: -snip-
werent you the one who literally got on me for getting on a no lim vote being counterproductive??? and you even agreeed to that and that instantly contradicted your claim where you said "a no lim doesn't create any discussion x and x". very very hypocritcal. i don't go back and forth. alstro + me have gave you what that quote meant like 5 times already and you even came at an understanding later after i told you that i proposed a summary at the end in whcih you were like it wasn't a summary but alstro already had gave you the meaning and i agreeed. alstro hit almost spot on and i added to it. |: i rlly dont know why u are still bringing this up now.
This post wasn't about defending anyone, it was showing NEE my case against you. And I don't understand why you didn't simply.. give him the answer, or even point to the post that had it. Also, just because something is obvious to you does not make it obvious to everyone.Grandpa wrote:
i have no idea what you are referring to here. this is what happened in the interaction between me and james -- it seems like you are getting very over defensive as ur possible scum partner james. i already explained this multiple times. look at post 146 and the whole quote wall wit james initial reply and my justification as it wasn't that obvious. that context was obvious and town should have easily got it.Zyla wrote:
I don't like that this is his best answer. Where in the conversation is the answer? How is it supposed to be found? If the person asking the question was able to find it, don't you think they would've just... not asked the question?In post 88, GrandpaMo wrote: Look at the full context please. Smh. The answer you are looking for should be within the conversation. I will give you a hint; the reason relates to a misunderstanding we BOTH had. (I am assuming)
I addressed how I read this in 355GrandpaMo wrote:idk if you noticed, but i said "possible scum" this was still when i was debating if u were scum or possible misguided town then james came into play and just used my bias. james could just be using u as a utility to vote me. thats where my paranoia creeked in. i didnt have any scumreads at the moment, but you were the only one who has potential to be scum. keywords: fully (which implies scumlean) and possible (paranoia of null read) and i furhter exemplified this in a later read where i said you were null scum leaning.
I'm bringing it up because I was asked toGrandpa wrote:Zyla wrote:
Scumreading someone for going to sleep is just.. bad.In post 158, GrandpaMo wrote:Also, I very much dislike how James just left this conversation. This looks bad for you, James.Spoiler:
Didn't mention James because I wasn't asked about James, also I don't think James called himself an easy voteGrandpa wrote:Spoiler:
but idk -- this should have been obvious to you. also it sounds like you could be manipulating this to make me look bad for only me? like you know i said easy vote off me OR james? not just me. why didn't you mention james??
POSSIBLE SCUMPARTNER???!?!?!?!?
we may never know:(- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Hey, you brought this upIn post 517, GrandpaMo wrote:honestly just forget this ... i dont want my frustration to get in my reads against you...
Quote the fact that I was asked to make a read-post on you? I pointed you to that in my original response to this post in 355Grandpa wrote: can you quote that?
I'm not sure I see your pointGrandpa wrote:lol u are just making me look bad. go read the quote back again. i mentioned me and james. -- and how WE were easy vote for scum if we were both town.
Also, can you try and avoid doing the colored text in replies? It makes it harder to keep track of who's saying what, orwhenyou're saying things, especially in long back and forths- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
If 'this' is you, I can't help but agreeIn post 526, GrandpaMo wrote:this is the real flailing scum- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
The entire history of the universe has led to this moment... How many posts have I made in Newbie 2068!
Pedit: what do you mean it's 43 now??- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I mean, I think a VFP elim would work and make sense, I don't like the fact that they were at E-1 and decided to join in with complete nonsense rather than anything worthwhile.
But it would also be nice to see some more from Cook and T3...
T3: You don't find VFP scummy. So why were you willing to put them at E1 this early in the day? (or even E2, since you apparently weren't keeping track)
Cook: You went directly from town-reading VFP to saying you were ok with a wagon and voting on them. What changed?- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Mostly a joke, I just know from experience in a Newbie 2065 that he's not really a "coaching" type scum-partner (to be fair to him, he didn't haveIn post 559, Val89 wrote:
What do you mean?In post 558, Zyla wrote:Maybe it's T3, he's a pretty silent partner, lolmuchof a chance, as he was meta-read early on in the game)- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
This is like... the LAMIST possible response to a question directed at someone elseIn post 736, Cook wrote:
Me? I summarize my thoughts and let the people with actually decent process of elimination do the thinking out loudIn post 731, Zyla wrote:When you make posts, do you usually just write what you're thinking and hit send?- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Actually, no, I don't think it's scummy. I just think it's confusing.In post 757, GrandpaMo wrote:
and u think thats scummy? cuz thats how i play as my town playstyle -- i like for town to listen to my thoughts // and gain negative or postiive reactions from them.In post 731, Zyla wrote:Grandpa, question for you. When you make posts, do you usually just write what you're thinking and hit send?
Stream of consciousness is great for a PT thread, but if you want other people to understand and follow your reads, it's helpful to read over your post at least once before posting it.In post 734, Zyla wrote:I want to clarify, that I'm not meaning that to be rude, I'd just personally suggest rereading your posts a couple of times, maybe even check spelling and grammar, not because those are necessary, but because rereading might help make sure your logic sounds like it would make sense to other people- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
In post 840, Val89 wrote:Wait, you can just use the tag "post" 838 and have the links inserted automatically? I've been manually copying the URL this entire timeOh no.
Yeah, it doesn't work in the attribution part of quote tags though, which is frustrating when you accidentally delete the starting tag- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Well, you're currently at E2, soIn post 871, VFP wrote:I am going to full claim at E1. Let's make that clear.
Where is Grampa's vote? >:|
VOTE: VFP
Pedit: Dangit, worth a shot - Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla