Newbie 2072: All Guns Blazing!! - Ended

[Portia]

that you were defending a scum partner

Is it pre-flip associations time? Let me get the popcorn.

VOTE: Val

AMA while I read backwards.

[Portia]

This newest angle coming from you really just feels like you are trying to weasel your way out of statements that are now being held against you

Obvs Im going in reverse, and was happy to see the preflip associations thing wasnt serious. I have reached two pretty safe conclusions: Im going to be too dumb to follow Val's cases, and Luke is the kind of addictive player who doesnt sign off until 4 hours after they intended to do so. Finally, with the quote, this is a pretty good sign that you are tunnelled and not hearing. Conf bias is a hell of a drug.

[Portia]

so far i've kinda thought luke seemed a bit off (mostly cuz i dont like his points on val98 very much)

You said similar things several times throughout our last game together, and we were both town

Im lazy - will you actually quote them saying the similar thing? Without hard proof, this would be quite effective manipilation.

[Portia]

By the way, does anyone else have an opinion if Zyla's post counts as a potential Buzzword scumtell?

The irony

I appreciate you.

Val, if the NM read wasnt real, why have you left your vote there for ages?

[Portia]

Since Val and Vote both start with V and linguistic logic will not be denied

portia and pavowski both start with a p, which makes u teammates try to fight this undeniable logic

Why not vote yet in the game - do you normally not RVS.

[Portia]

that you were defending a scum partner

Is it pre-flip associations time? Let me get the popcorn.

Let's expand that 106 quote just a tiny bit more:

The thing I think might potentially be scummy is the fact that you took something I thought was obviously non-serious, that you were defending a scum partner, as serious, when at least some other players did not.

Did you really take that to mean I was making legimitiate pre-flip associations?

Like I said, I’m a bit too much of a dum dum to try to parse all your nested conditional sentences. But I was happy when I got further back and realized it wasn’t serious.

[Portia]

^^^
*puts vote away
*asks other person y no vote

There’s something about the implicit contradiction in that post that just rings town to me.

[Portia]

VOTE: Umlaut

Come talk to us!!

Please respect vacations.

[Portia]

Do you see the one w the triangles. Take that and stuff it up you ass.

[Portia]

Works for me.

I was finding your tunnel unhelpful.

I don’t have much in the way of reads or leans but that’s fairly standard for me until I get a flip or two.

I don’t think you v p person is tvt.

I tend to think Marci is fairly Newb town.

I’m most interested in sorting the Lebowski person.

But I don’t have much to offer for now so don’t mind sticking to the sidelines and I’ll jump out when I have rea thoughts.

[Portia]

P person = Val. Don’t ask me how the brain transposed that.

No, just an ethos on Marci. The non voting matters some given meta consistency.

[Portia]

don't love the tone of how he jumped on you in 166,

This is a fair comment - I was a bit boozed up and Agro, and apologize to Luke and you all. That your post felt misreppy after I had taken a stance is not an excuse for being a jerk. I’m sorry to the board.

As for the earlier question about how I could not like the 1v1 and still find it alignment/tone indicative, it has to do with duration. I didn’t like it because it didn’t seem like you all were at all hearing the other (both made good points) and it continued long past it’s utility I’m thankful it’s no longer drowning the play.

[Portia]

so far i've kinda thought luke seemed a bit off (mostly cuz i dont like his points on val98 very much)

You said similar things several times throughout our last game together, and we were both town

Im lazy - will you actually quote them saying the similar thing? Without hard proof, this would be quite effective manipilation.

Luke you mind hitting this up

[Portia]

Things I know I never like: self voting.

Things I know: I’m aggrieved hammered again (this week is the one I took off work)

Things I want to know: why Zola and Astro haven’t made any impression on me so far.

Things I want to do : bullshit at mafia for a bit.

Whos with me?

[Portia]

As for nm, he is actively following which is more than I would expect given meta.

[Portia]

I don’t want to eliminate Val or Luke. They keep thread Alice to an e stent I think town suffers regardless of the flip. I want to see where they push off each other. Bet that might just be me.

[Portia]

Yea spellings not my forte

Please explain the difference between not liking it a d. It finding it useful. To me they confirm the same idea.

And there was nothing about the post I called out as scummy. Rather it’s two surface ideas that don’t cohere. And the willingness to post both in one spelled a lack of self confidence. Do you disagree?

[Portia]

Not self confidence. Rather lack of self-checking. Lack of self-awareness. Think I. Got it right this time.

[Portia]

The egg will taste good either way Luke

[Portia]

I wasn’t trying to set up the idea that it would turn on me. That was a phone autocurooredt. It was : but maybe that’s just me. Rather than I bet it’s me. I wa showing to leave that autocorrect be though til you called it.

[Portia]

I think pressure on more slots I the way to do. Right now I would pressure Astro if I had pressuring. Skill. Pablo did well enough to answer my first day questions. A