Newbie 2072: All Guns Blazing!! - Ended
Forum rules
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Luke! Vote Marci, she's masonhunting!In post 13, marcistar wrote:
portia and pavowski both start with a p, which makes u teammates try to fight this undeniable logicIn post 11, Pavowski wrote:Since Val and Vote both start with V and linguistic logic will not be denied- Zyla
-
Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
7for7 is probably not the best way to play tbhIn post 56, Val89 wrote:
If you try and read my confident conclusion through the lens of a newbie player who has 100% accuracy at deducing scum post-1, that it might help unbaffle you.In post 47, Lukewarm wrote:The idea that any town player would already be ready to decide who should be the Day 1 elim on page 2 baffles me
Of course, if it turns out I am wrong this time, then I might just have to face up to the fact that my post-1 reads may be NAI, but until I see the flip, I won't know that, will I?
As you will see if you read further into 2068, I eventually decided someone else was acting more scummy than my post-1 pick, and moved my vote to them. The person I ended up scumreading ended up being a town PR, so in hindsight, it turns out I should have just stuck to my guns on that first post-1 read. Stands to reason I will take that experience into my future games, no?- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Aren't all the best people?In post 58, Lukewarm wrote:Maybe Val is just strange.
Also, you only need to put 'v' or 'uv' inside the square brackets, personally I find that much easier than locating the button
Pedit: I dunno, you just through out a buzzword yourself... /jk
Honestly though, I think that's the only serious post of mine that's really "buzzy"- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I on the other hand am confident that I need to look over Luke's posts 5 times, never trust a gut read, and at least take into consideration anything everyone else says about him. (Yes, I should be doing that with everyone, but still)In post 63, Lukewarm wrote:
From what I can see, the 7for7 is the only one she has used, so I think it is too early to say that -- and now that you have pointed it out, it will likely never be useful to sort her.In post 60, Val89 wrote:By the way, does anyone else have an opinion if Zyla's post counts as a potential Buzzword scumtell?
However, I am pretty confident in my ability to have a solid read on her by the end of Day 1 -- I will keep you posted- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I'm going to say that I'm a little bit confused since we aren't in any games together. Since we can talk about 2068, which we were both in, does that do anything to help or harm me in your eyes?In post 73, alstroemerial wrote:Ah here we go -- I have my eye on Zyla a bit already because [ongoing games] but it's more of a lean than a read at this point
Why not? Sure we shouldn't eliminate him right now, as it's early in the day, but most people seem to agree that they're hard to read and would be an easy mis-elim, which I at least would rather do the most likely miselim on day 1 and let someone else contribute to the threadIn post 99, Val89 wrote:For the record on my part: I do not think Not_Mafia [...] should be the lim today
Now hold on a second. If I'm reading this correctly, Luke was saying that Alstro was takingIn post 101, Val89 wrote:Interesting choice of quote from Alstro's 73. Seems like this one would be the one actually relevant to the topic at hand:
In post 73, alstroemerial wrote:As a result, Luke's response threw me off a bit because it seemed to be taking it completely at face value. So I wasn't sure if Luke was, like, playing along, or...?youseriously. That doesn't mean they were taking you RVS post seriously. (And yes, it's dressed up and entertaining, but it's still RVS) You both really seem to like taking what the other person is saying out of context- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
In the one I read, it seemed to be consistent with his normal (from the meta-reading I did out of curiosity) except for the fact that he doesn't do quickhammers in newbiesIn post 125, Val89 wrote:Mainly because I don't want to put too much stock in what most people seem to agree when I've not played with him, and I don't think I've yet read a newbie game with him in it.
Early days, but I haven't yet seen anything to suggest he will be trouble, or any harder to read than anyone else in the game.
As for the second part, he's claimed himself that he's not voting seriously, which at least to me seems like an anti-town red flag (whether or not he's scum), what's your thought on that?
Also, my main thing was that you said flat out he wasn't the vote today; wouldn't you be willing to eliminate him if more information pointed to him being scummy?- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
To clarify, I am referring to his post 71, which I at least find... interesting. RVS votes are a bit different than not voting someone you think is scummyIn post 131, Val89 wrote:There are a few people not voting seriously at this point; you, Zyla, among them, I beleive. If he maintains that position when we are further in the game and have good cause to be voting people seriously and he isn't, we can talk again.
I do think it would be a decent time to retract my RVS though, so
UNVOTE: Lukewarm- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Lmao, no that's because I literally said "That joke sounded more like you were claiming Mason" (not exact words) to someone.In post 143, Val89 wrote:I am starting to feel a little bit like I am being asked if I am a Mason with NM. I can start to understand where you get your reputation for that sort of thing from.
Hilariously, Luke was the actual Mason in the game- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Nah, my thoughts are that we should scum hunt, and then lim the person who seems to be the most anti-town/least pro-town. I was mostly playing devil's advocate since Val seemed too sure that we shouldn't vote N_M so I made a weak case for why we should.In post 149, Lukewarm wrote:You think it is better to just go ahead and shoot the easy mis-elim target, then for us to try and scum hunt?
If no one else seems scummier than N_M, we'll eliminate him, but I definitely want to try and find other people first, especially if he is - as you say - a good scum hunter- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Disclaimer, just quickly caught back up, these are what caught my attention, there will be more, and I'm going to go back through again with and without ISOs
Apologies on this, something IRL that I thought had been dealt with came back to bite me, so I had less free time than expected.In post 185, Pavowski wrote:I think Zyla is hanging back where she doesn't normally seem to, which is not a great look.
Should be able to get back to at least semi-regular posting soon though
I'm definitely noting this statement. It's no one's job to defend another player, town or otherwise, unless they have information saying that getting that person eliminated is a bad idea. Luke made a case for you being scum, and whether or not I agree with it, I want to see your reasons or explanations, not Pav or alstro'sIn post 225, Val89 wrote:My answer to both of these is that I am hoping the response of the rest of the player list to Lukes 'case' against me will help me do just that.
This is also kind of interesting to me however, we've established in our previous game that I'm not yet sure on how to differentiate town! and scum!Luke, so why would it be obvious?In post 241, Lukewarm wrote:I do feel like I should be pretty obviously in my town game for anyone who has played with me before, especially [..] Zyla- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
These ISO posts are not going to be scum or town cases, just my general read and a few posts that I wanted to comment on
Alstro - Town Lean
Fair enough, I'm not quite sure I see it, but that seems reasonableIn post 159, alstroemerial wrote:[.. I was] comparing your town play in 2068 with your scum play in The Backrooms (2065), and at the time I thought I was seeing more in line with 2065. The most recent string of posts (starting 140ish) makes me feel better, putting you more at a null.
How come? Questions seem essential in this game to me, they let you see where people are coming from, and can be helpful in both creating useful cases and discarding poor ones. Readlists and the like are useful, but IME they're most useful in something that you talk about with other people - when they ask questions about themIn post 224, alstroemerial wrote:At the time of [my] voting, your ISO .. had mostly questions to other people (68, 70, 84, 119) ... and ... which is fair but in my opinion not the most productive area of focus.
The article doesIn post 242, alstroemerial wrote: So, I don't know if what the article is saying about [self-voting] being "unreadable and inherently unhelpful" is necessarily true in this case.mostlyseem to be about RVS votes, so while it does mention scum self-hammers, I mostly read it as self-RVS being bad more than anything- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Skipping Luke for double ISO with Val
Marci - NullTo clarify if anyone is still confused, I did know that it was a (joking) scum team accusation, but at least to me it's a funny joke with Luke
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Not_Mafia - Null
It's a game, and you seem to be having fun, which is good. I hope Luke is correct that you're good at scumhunting
Also, I may have said that I was down for PE earlier (partially for reactions), but I'm down for you helping us remember that it is, after all, just a game. Apologies if I seemed rude earlier
Has this changed with more information? If it's Luke or Val today, would you still pick Luke?In post 71, Not_Mafia wrote:If I were voting seriously at this point, I'd be voting Lukewarm- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I believe he is referring to our Newbie 2065In post 260, marcistar wrote:
can anyone confirm?In post 251, Lukewarm wrote:And to be frank, I would have expected to see the similarities in how this is playing out in my town game. Where I reached 100% certainty that T3 was scum, and then whipped up the votes- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Portia - Null Scum
I don't know about this. Too scummy to be scum just doesn't seem very reliable.In post 120, Portia wrote:There’s something about the implicit contradiction in that post that just rings town to me.
In post 168, Portia wrote:I was finding your tunnel unhelpful.
..
I don’t think you v p person is tvt.
Now hold on a moment, you didn't say you didn't like it, you said it wasn't useful, there's a big difference thereIn post 196, Portia wrote:As for the earlier question about how I could not like the 1v1 and still find it alignment/tone indicative
Hehe, that's a new spellingIn post 258, Portia wrote:Zola- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Umlaut - Null
Hold on a moment there, I unvoted because I didn't feelIn post 199, Umlaut wrote:[*]140 -- another tell here: explicitly saying "I'm unvoting because it's not RVS" as if RVS were a formalized game phase is something that more often comes from scummyRVS vote was necessary, no it's not a formal stage, but I didn't feel that my vote would be useful any further so I retracted it.
"I can see where you're coming from, but here's why I did it as town" seems reasonable to meIn post 229, Umlaut wrote:There's not really any good way to engage with someone who is insisting you are mafia, though. Like what is he supposed to say, "Oh well you make a good point there, maybe I'm scum after all"?- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Luke and Val - SvT
Honestly, this is just a total mess. I was trying to read opposite of what my gut was telling me, but Luke was making a lot of sense, and I was agreeing with him and thinking he was town. Then comes 239. I... have no words tbh, I don't know how this could ever be a good move in this situation. And then he starts begging for votes on Val, and honestly becomes the most confusing 1v1 I've read so far. I do find it hard to believe that they're both town, and even harder that they're both scum, at this point, but I don't think it's clear at this point who's who.
If you're as sure as you claim to be about this, then to me Val seems almost like an auto-elim tomorrow if you flip town, and you an almost auto-elim tomorrow if Val flips town. Why would I want to investigate you overnight? And if it's anything but Cop, would it even be worth it? I doubt scum team would have someone under so much suspicion do the killIn post 234, Lukewarm wrote:If we do elim within [me, Val], and the consensus is to flip me -- then Val should always be investigated if we have any investigative abilities.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
It's not that itIn post 320, Umlaut wrote:
Why can't this be TvT? I understand why Luke and Val both insist it can't be, because they both (either genuinely or artificially) justIn post 297, Zyla wrote:Luke and Val - SvT
Honestly, this is just a total mess. I was trying to read opposite of what my gut was telling me, but Luke was making a lot of sense, and I was agreeing with him and thinking he was town. Then comes 239. I... have no words tbh, I don't know how this could ever be a good move in this situation. And then he starts begging for votes on Val, and honestly becomes the most confusing 1v1 I've read so far. I do find it hard to believe that they're both town, and even harder that they're both scum, at this point, but I don't think it's clear at this point who's who.know with such certaintythat the other one is scum and so it seems obvious from internally that they are in a battle of Good Versus Evil. But I don't see it as nearly so certain from an outside perspective and I'm not sure why you do. What precludes them just being two terrifically tunneled townsfolk?can'tbe, it's that I feel that's it's a good bit greater than random a chance that there's it's SvT. At this point I'm still unsure of which one is more likely than the other though, which is why it's a combined read of SvT rather than individual reads of scummy or towny
I'm.. not really liking the self imposed post limits here. Like don't post more than you want to, but not posting because of an arbitrary limit you set?In post 315, Lukewarm wrote:With that, I am tapped out! See you guys tomorrow- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I'm leaning Val as scum, but it's 60/40 right now. Neither of them are looking good in my eyes, but it seems way too early in the thread for it to be bussing, which is honestly the only reason I think there's only one scum between themIn post 338, Pavowski wrote:VOTE: Zyla because I think you're hedging. You said you think Luke/Val is SvT but you're not sure which way. If you think there's scum on one side, you must have an opinion, even if it's only an inkling.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I can't speak for everyone, but I'm recovering from something right now, and the harsh tone of the thread is making it harder for me to enjoy the game, and thus harder to play. It's not that I'm content to sit and watch as much as that I feel engaging with it too much isn't a good idea for meIn post 351, Val89 wrote:
That's a fair assesment. We are approaching page 15, and I'm getting a little frustrated that everyone seems content to sit back and watch.In post 348, marcistar wrote:val seems a bit more aggressive rn imo
I think we all need to take a step back and remember that we're doing this to havefun- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I don't particularly like the Luke/Val 1v1, it's been messy and I feel like it's gone on a bit too long, with them focusing too little on players outside of each other. I find itIn post 267, Portia wrote:Please explain the difference between not liking it [and not] finding it useful. To me they confirm the same idea.
And there was nothing about the post I called out as scummy. Rather it’s two surface ideas that don’t cohere. And the willingness to post both in one spelled a lack of self [awareness]. Do you disagree?usefulbecause it's allowed me to decide that there's most likely at least one scum there.
I would think the fact that it causes you to think that's there's scum in [Luke, Val] would mean it was useful, whether or not you liked it- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Still waiting for Not_Mafia to respond to this btwIn post 257, Zyla wrote:
Has this changed with more information? If it's Luke or Val today, would you still pick Luke?In post 71, Not_Mafia wrote:If I were voting seriously at this point, I'd be voting Lukewarm- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I thought that the post for almost everyone was pretty decent work on my end, although apparently I missed doing yours somehow.In post 386, Pavowski wrote:As I mentioned a few posts ago, I think Zyla is coasting, as I don't see a lot of substance out of her posts and not a lot of evidence of hunting or analysis of the game.
I gave clear reads, clarified positions on a couple things, asked questions when I had them, overall I'm not sure what I'm missing in your eyes- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Compiled Reads list for ease of reference
Alstro - Town Lean - 255Seems to be genuinely trying to sort
Pav - Slight Town Lean -
Portia - Null Scum - 264
One probable Scum in
Luke - Null Town
Val - Null Scum
Luke has definitely not been playing up to what I've seen before, but page 15, it seemed like he was trying to move away from the 1v1 and interact with the thread as a whole, but Val was dragging him back in- Zyla
-
Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
I was asking alstro a question about their read on me, I fail to see why that doesn't count as meaningful
I feel like your missing my context here. I wanted to see how Val would react, I commented more in 142 and 151, it was a purposeful weak case to see what Val said. And personally, I think the answers I got out of it can potentially be helpful in the futureNot
completelyempty but an easy thing to comment on and not town-indicative, and rang some "fake activity" bells in my head in that it's an easy low-risk thing to comment on and appear to be contributing.
That part wasn't even really about reading them, just general frustration"You're both being silly" is an obvious point and an easy way to position oneself as the voice of reason.Spoiler:
1st one is an easy observation, yes, but Val claimed to not have the information so I gave it to him
The first two parts seem like easy observations and the question in the third is just weird and fake-seeming to me ("Would you be willing to eliminate someone if evidence says they are scum?" Is that really a question you need to ask?)In post 126, Zyla wrote:
In the one I read, it seemed to be consistent with his normal (from the meta-reading I did out of curiosity) except for the fact that he doesn't do quickhammers in newbiesIn post 125, Val89 wrote:Mainly because I don't want to put too much stock in what most people seem to agree when I've not played with him, and I don't think I've yet read a newbie game with him in it.
Early days, but I haven't yet seen anything to suggest he will be trouble, or any harder to read than anyone else in the game.
As for the second part, he's claimed himself that he's not voting seriously, which at least to me seems like an anti-town red flag (whether or not he's scum), what's your thought on that?
Also, my main thing was that you said flat out he wasn't the vote today; wouldn't you be willing to eliminate him if more information pointed to him being scummy?
2nd is a question. I wanted Val to give an opinion.
3rd has an obvious answer of yes in most cases, yes, buthowhe answers yes may have potential if the reason he seemed sure about not wanting to vote N_M was because they were teamed together- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
@Alstro, about 73, Mini Normal 2218 has just concluded, so I'm interested in hearing what your thoughts were- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
At least IMO, knowing why someone is reading me one way seems like a good way to understand their motivations in the game, even if someone's wrong in reading me as scum they can be reading me that way for decent reasons or poor ones; the connection between this and my Normal could help me decide which one I think it isIn post 466, Pavowski wrote:I'm curious what she's looking for from Alstro above because I'm trying to figure out if I actually TR Alstro or if I'm just gutfeeling it there.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Haha, not what I was expecting, but I can track you thereIn post 468, alstroemerial wrote:
This is actually not the game I was following >.< Sorry... I know it's counterintuitive -- it was actually referring to a game you aren't in, but something involving you in Newbie Backrooms came up as a topic of conversation and I was using that. But since you went to the trouble of linking this mini normal, I checked your role and did a quick read of the ISO (btw, I'm with you on the ISO-lation thing you mentioned in that game ). One thing I noticed which I haven't realized is that Backrooms was your first game (I think? Correct me if I'm wrong), which really diminishes my confidence in being able to apply any meta based on that since I know style changes faster for newer players... The hunch I was running on was pretty much purely based on style meta so that could change quickly. It's also harder just because you've been around less (which just to be clear I am NOT reading you for; I totally get real-life stuff and I do hope everything is okay), so I'm not sure how much any differences in mini normal 2218 and this game are indicative of anything other than real-life conditions.In post 452, Zyla wrote:@Alstro, about 73, Mini Normal 2218 has just concluded, so I'm interested in hearing what your thoughts were
What I will say is that I do see similarities in your post style in that mini normal and this game, in terms of tone, length, general content, which is reassuring although not enough to push you to a full TR in this game. On that note..- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Ok, I'm getting slightly annoyed at this point, especially with his past two posts
VOTE: Not Mafia
I have no way of telling if he's scum or town, because he seems to be refusing to actually participate in the game. He's thrown a couple of votes around, but refused to actually say why, and he doesn't seem to want to change that any time soon.- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
Pav and Alstro are pretty towny to me
Luke is still Null Town for me, because the NK doesn't make sense to me for Luke, but neither does the tunneling on Val yesterday
Marci is Null still, but townier than yesterday
Umlaut was one of my big 3 questions other than Shrek, and they and NM were on the Shrek wagon, so if NM is town, Umlaut is probably scum imo
I really think the way that Not_Mafia is playing is anti-town, but I'm not sure whether they're scum or just a nuisance- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
So easy as in easy to throw around more than easy as in LHF?In post 729, Pavowski wrote:Not a hard-and-fast term, but given that the prospect of a NM elimination was pretty much "meh" on d1 and Zyla was never really in serious danger of getting eliminated -- especially when you voted her -- I would consider those easy votes
LessIn post 730, Pavowski wrote:
Why is Marci townier today?In post 724, Zyla wrote:Marci is Null still, but townier than yesterdaytodayreally, and more just since I last posted my reads list, bad wording on my part. Her posts after that point were looking townier to me than the ones before it, so she's just not one of my major suspects atm- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
- Zyla
-
Zyla Goon
- Zyla
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 513
- Joined: May 18, 2021
NopeIn post 961, alstroemerial wrote:Zyla, were you fake crumbing masons? Part of the reason I scumread your slot was because I thought you were hinting masons when I knew there were none in the game.In post 470, Zyla wrote:Haha, not what I was expecting, but I can track you thereIn post 28, Zyla wrote:Yeah, Val's first post tracksIn post 297, Zyla wrote:Why would I want to investigate you overnight? And if it's anything but Cop, would it even be worth it? - Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla
- Zyla