Open 809: Charge Me Up! [Over]
Forum rules
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
In post 27, flow trap wrote:My early game specialty is analyzing first votes, my methods only work when there are no pluralities
your specialty is analyzing first votes but only when there are no wagons?In post 35, flow trap wrote:I guess plurality on MS terms is Wagon
what"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
what don't you like about itIn post 94, Lukewarm wrote:But I also really don't like VFP immediately taking Flow Trap's word that they were confirmed town - joking or not, still unclear but kind of irrelevant to me after they dodged the question the first time tbh
what's irrelevant and why does that matter"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
for whatever he's doing with Dragons"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
sums me up, tbhIn post 120, DkKoba wrote:its a brain age exercise"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
having never played this setup before, and so not sure of the exact contours of the rule, i would be careful about talking about where this might be going given the no-n0-talk rule."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
sureIn post 135, yessiree wrote:
What about it, can you explain?In post 107, Green Crayons wrote:for whatever he's doing with Dragons
it looks like trying to create suspicions over things that are not suspicious or even ai
that it's done to help support/protect DMG also pings
Spoiler: posts"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
weird. i assume when people say "oh i don't like that player did x" that means they think it's suspicious.In post 138, Lukewarm wrote:I don't like it because Flow trap is definitely not confirmed town, so anyone taking their word for it is bad. That does not really seem like a scum thing to do, so I am not scum reading them for it, but I am pointing out that I don't like it lol
are the other things you point out as not liking also you saying you think that it is just non-ai bad play? or just this one instance."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
watIn post 145, Dark Magician Girl wrote:Dk probably town, but if they're scum then lukewarm is definitely scum"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
is this the first time this setup has been played on the site?In post 152, yessiree wrote:I think the setup is 3 scum 11 town, thats all
if not, i'm sure someone who is in the pl has an encyclopedia brain and/or played it before to let us know if there has ever been a deviation of total scum/non-town roles"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
perhaps we're using different vocabulary because i don't know what this is. i'm asking if prior runs of this game have different amounts of non-town slots, or has it always been the same ratio.In post 162, DkKoba wrote:no there isn't - alignment was randed before we even got roles - setup explicitly says this."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
hm.In post 159, yessiree wrote:well, I found it odd how STD (...dragons? save?) chose to explain the reason for his lack of followup instead of just following up on dark magician, cause that seemed a bit too self-conscious for a townie
VOTE: DMG"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
In post 194, Lukewarm wrote:
I guess that works tooIn post 193, flow trap wrote:Why claim when you can just die?
VOTE: Lukewarm
This thread iswild. The overall tone is way different then what I am used to lolIn post 186, Lukewarm wrote:I don't like it, because even if it is a town player doing it, it makes it harder for town to win."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
disagree. it reminds me of when i'm scum and it's hard to come up with bs suspicions, so i make a unoffensive observation postIn post 226, Lukewarm wrote:But their last post has changed that view a bit for me. Moving them to the "leaning town" category"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
none of this is “this player is scum”In post 224, Dark Magician Girl wrote:lukewarm feels like they're just going through the motions
I don't really know why my partner is town reading them. Or DK for that matter.
I can barely tell when VFP is joking but I think their general demeanor is pretty towny. They feel detached from the thread in a way that makes me think they're just trying to solve and not interested in the rest
I wanna town read flea just cause I like faem but they need to give some more reads they have good tone at least
STDs nickname is pretty funny but every time I read their posts I just go what is this
don't particularly care to comment on anything else atm
and it’s all wiggle room"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
VOTE: lukewarmIn post 290, Lukewarm wrote:In post 264, VFP wrote: The VFP block doesn't need explaining, just trusted.In post 268, VFP wrote: I'm trying to convince you all that I'm town so the VFP block actually works.
You know what, you have managed to sell me on the power of the VFP block. So who are we for voting for, boss?In post 283, VFP wrote:If I'm wrong, give me 6 more shots to be right. If I'm still wrong, then we can review where I was wrong and why.
And if you are going to say we should vote for me, I have good news, because that is already where my vote is !!"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
just super scummy vibes from that post
also happy with DMG, who I also think is scum for reasons stated + soft attempt at pocketing yes"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
lolIn post 307, Dark Magician Girl wrote:in case my post above wasn't obvious enough, Green, that's me calling you mafia"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
no thank youIn post 305, DkKoba wrote:so now that we have progressed a little - how do people feel about no limming so PRs can do their thing and investigatives can potentially give us some juicy info?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
so we give up an elim for the benefit of presumably not mis-elim a pr that might provide n1 info (or, really, outing that pr under presumption we don't mis-elim after claim and having it potentially nk'd n1)
i mean, there's a lot of ifs and buts in that scenario, but two assumptions that come to mind that undermine the usefulness of the plan is that 1) the PL actually picked a bunch of different, useful prs and not just a handful and 2) town got the n1-info-revealing prs rather than scum."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
more accurately phrased:In post 317, Green Crayons wrote:two assumptions that come to mind that undermine the usefulness of the plan
two assumptions that i don't think have a basis to be made, but the likelihood of the plan's usefulness seem to hinge on"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
dmg + dragons were doing their early d1 thing, and yes came in on dmg's sideIn post 330, Flea The Magician wrote:
Please restate for the record.In post 304, Green Crayons wrote:just super scummy vibes from that post
also happy with DMG, who I also think is scum for reasons stated + soft attempt at pocketing yes
i voted yes for his input into the dmg + dragons convo
later on when yes & I were talking through my yes vote, dmg votes me without a reason
looks like dmg beginning to pocket after yes already appeared favorable to dmg's slot"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
idk what this prompt is ("that all?")In post 330, Flea The Magician wrote:
That all?In post 314, Green Crayons wrote:
lolIn post 307, Dark Magician Girl wrote:in case my post above wasn't obvious enough, Green, that's me calling you mafia
but lol at dmg's clear misrep of my vote"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
oh that wasn't the restatementIn post 347, Green Crayons wrote:
dmg + dragons were doing their early d1 thing, and yes came in on dmg's sideIn post 330, Flea The Magician wrote:
Please restate for the record.In post 304, Green Crayons wrote:just super scummy vibes from that post
also happy with DMG, who I also think is scum for reasons stated + soft attempt at pocketing yes
i voted yes for his input into the dmg + dragons convo
later on when yes & I were talking through my yes vote, dmg votes me without a reason
looks like dmg beginning to pocket after yes already appeared favorable to dmg's slot
here is the restatementIn post 246, Green Crayons wrote:
disagree. it reminds me of when i'm scum and it's hard to come up with bs suspicions, so i make a unoffensive observation postIn post 226, Lukewarm wrote:But their last post has changed that view a bit for me. Moving them to the "leaning town" category"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
does jv always have a hair-trigger about how other people categorize/view their play?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
or, like, more generally. the blow up feels forced but idk if this is just how jv exists."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
495 is impossible to easily respond to, please separate out your points/lines of conversation with separate posts"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
disagreeIn post 508, VFP wrote:
Forced or not, its NAI.In post 507, Green Crayons wrote:or, like, more generally. the blow up feels forced but idk if this is just how jv exists.
i used a similar "get exasperated and super defensive" response to koba's suspicions as scum
if jv doesn't usually act this way, then what's the reason here?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
my eyes just fell out of their head"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
In post 513, flow trap wrote:Were your eyes in someone else's head or something?
???In post 522, Not_Mafia wrote:
Your eyes have their own head?In post 512, Green Crayons wrote:my eyes just fell out of their head
doesn't everyone loan out their eyes?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
tyIn post 517, MiniVirgo wrote:Also I fucking can't stand them as a person so there's that.
now this is nai"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Koba if mini is town who are you voting?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting). - Green Crayons
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons