This is relatable
VOTE: VFP
bandwagon
Do you want me to change my vote so that everyone has been voted 0-1 times?In post 52, flow trap wrote:I need my interpreterIn post 42, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm not the only one who has no clue what flow trap is trying to say, right?
I forgot this was a player and was very confused for a minute.
I won't protest lolDkKoba wrote:ok yall gonna think im fucking crazy for this take but its def a proper vibe.In post 108, NDMath wrote:94
I found this post townie, unlike the other players who have given thoughts on it.
Lukewarm is in a mindset of looking for what is protown behavior vs not. Specifically the more passive tone is what makes it read as actual thoughts versus scum trying to display a 'town mindset' to me.
I forgot this was a player and was very confused for a minute.
NDmath cannot be partners with Lukewarm - i can explain later if needed.
Very confused how you got this far without seeing the alignment ratios. I question if that's a mistake town can make.In post 128, Flea The Magician wrote:SK is complete speculation btw but it is 14p...
It's just the alignment ratios, I don't get your complaint?
You scumread them for... not posting?VFP wrote:Yessiree is on the town list. Not quite on the VFP block but damn close.
@Rayacan you prod the solo names for MiniVirgo?
If this slot doesn't start producing after that, they're going into the scum pile.
Can you elaborate on the reasoning behind these?In post 145, Dark Magician Girl wrote:flow trap and VFP are my biggest townreads
Jackson explained the most of it. Reads based off activity are generally lazy, and specifically so on a slot that hasn't posted at all (where that reason is very very likely to not be game related.)In post 168, VFP wrote:Yes. If they avoid the game after a prod, it's for a reason. You seem worried here?In post 165, NDMath wrote:You scumread them for... not posting?
Lukewarm is still referring to flowtrap saying that flowtrap is town, the concern being that that is something both town and mafia would say, and you haven't justified what about this specific instance makes it different.In post 188, VFP wrote:I don't understand, why wouldn't I agree with it?In post 186, Lukewarm wrote:VFP agreeing with flow trap's claim
Me three.In post 192, Lukewarm wrote:I also hard claim a power roleIn post 190, DkKoba wrote:I hardclaim pr -
@DkKoba, Help I'm confused.In post 199, flow trap wrote:Nah, ask DKIn post 195, NDMath wrote:Lukewarm is still referring to flowtrap saying that flowtrap is town, the concern being that that is something both town and mafia would say, and you haven't justified what about this specific instance makes it different.
In post 211, VFP wrote:Lukewarm
ND
Lukewarm red flip adds Green to VFP block.
Lukewarm Green flip adds Green to scum
You seem to be more confident on me being scum than lukewarm, why are you voting lukewarm over me when there's still plenty of time in the day?
In post 214, NDMath wrote:In post 211, VFP wrote:Lukewarm
ND
Lukewarm red flip adds Green to VFP block.
Lukewarm Green flip adds Green to scumYou seem to be more confident on me being scum than lukewarm, why are you voting lukewarm over me when there's still plenty of time in the day?
Why do you scumread me; that was never explained?
Why are you in a rush to end day before some players (mozamis, the mini head) have even engaged with the thread?
You were down to five non-townreads. Exactly one scum in a set of two implies two in the set of three, which is how I got the impression.In post 289, VFP wrote:Where did you get the impression that I'm more confident in you scum to Lukewarm?
My comment is that Green and Lukewarm are not scum together.
"your play" is so vague a reason I cannot even attempt to understand where you're coming from. I can't explain why you're wrong on me without your thought process, merely that you are wrong because you ended up at the wrong destination.VFP wrote: I think you are most likely scum because your play.
I'm also happy to end the day because we win with my block. If players wish to drag the day out, I won't object.
Why am I wrong on you?
Being scumread for no apparent reason is inherently agitating? The other reason is I was trying to get more reasoning out of VFP is so I can form a better read on them.In post 297, Lukewarm wrote:Like, he seems really defensive, and wants to try really hard to defend himself, and appears to be adjitated that he isn't getting better reasoning from VFP so he can form a better defense. Seems fishy to me
Near the end of the last game I played a higher posting rate was used to argue another player was town (By Bell on Nono), so it's still fresh in my mind.In post 300, Lukewarm wrote:And here, he is fishing for a defensive argument, despite any of the suspicion logic coming from VFP.In post 291, NDMath wrote:So far I've posted at a higher posting rate than usual for me as either alignment,
And who is even thinking about their posting rate this early on Day 1 anyways? Maybe scum who has been actively trying to post more in order to avoid suspicion, so they have been thinking about their posting rate since before the thread even opened up.
Getting rid of one person isn't gonna affect investigative's ability much at all compared to the cost of no elimming.In post 305, DkKoba wrote:so now that we have progressed a little - how do people feel about no limming so PRs can do their thing and investigatives can potentially give us some juicy info?
In post 322, mozamis wrote:when did they do this?In post 53, NDMath wrote:I have a townlean on Lukewarm since I think the initiative to look for the best mechanical play is a town thought.
Is your point here that it's concerning how much it took for vfp to share reasonings or am I completely misunderstanding you?Lukewarm wrote:Furthermore, I am really glad that I choose VFP for the person when I chose someone to day I was going to blindly follow, because it appears to be the first thing to make them post a well reasoned post lol.
{Trimmed}
An actual post, with reasonings that can be analyze, huzzah
I agree I have been defensive, my argument is that I have good reason to be.In post 332, Lukewarm wrote:Maybe if it was not Day 1, when more reads have very little to go on anyways. And maybe if VFP's scum read on you was getting you close to being voted out.In post 329, NDMath wrote:Being scumread for no apparent reason is inherently agitating?
It rubbed me the wrong way because it is Day 1, and you have zero votes on you, like VFP isn't even voting for you, but you still seem defensive.
Can you elaborate on why flow?In post 533, DkKoba wrote:lets flip within flow/mini
I don't like this response; Flow trap points out you're using a fallacy in your reasoning and your first response is to call it unimportant rather than either modify your reasoning or argue that you didn't use a fallacy.In post 566, Lukewarm wrote:Yeah, I don't really care to argue a point that has already been addressed by VFP. I don't think it will get us anywhereIn post 565, flow trap wrote:All dogs are animals a cat being an animal does not disprove that all dogs are animals
A dog which is not an animal disproves all dogs are animals
I disagree with your reasoning on minivirgo. I think you had been an 'easy/acceptable' target for scum to push, and the concern about the prod seems very nai in that it's a genuine frustration they would have at you regardless of their alignment.In post 575, VFP wrote: As of who I think is town
Miniis focused on the game at me. It's not like it's a popular place to push and there are much easier / accpetable targets for Mini to go for here. I don't think scum Mini get concerned about me asking for a prod on them either. The back and fourther between them and Dk was just not useful on a scale of sorting. The above is what makes me think town too.
Null
DragonsI almost want to put as lean town but I feel that they do reads to appease rather than what they believe. Personally I think Dragon has a lot to offer though if town and I want to go through more reads with them directly day 2.
Lean scum
Greenis playing as a typical scum, pick a target and stick to it without adding anything else to the game. As it stands there seem to be a few names I can't see with Green and with my thoughts on the Mini wagon I can see this as a good lim.
Do you have any thoughts on the koba and minivirgo argument?
Can you explain this scumread? (If you did earlier I'm not finding it.)
I'm sure you know what my follow up question isIn post 672, yessiree wrote:I doIn post 668, NDMath wrote:Do you have any thoughts on the koba and minivirgo argument?
It's not a slip if no one can state a reason for it which only applies to scum.In post 780, Dark Magician Girl wrote:the way Math completely mischaracterized Flow slipping is notedIn post 774, NDMath wrote:Spoiler: biggish quote
I like this response compared to your previous posts.
VOTE: minivirgo
Still think this slot has the plurality chance to be scum; definitely prefer it to flowtrap who's only being scumread for posting in weird style.
The Flea and Dragons interaction to me looks bad for flea because the accusation that dragons hadn't read the post was unfounded and there isn't a reason for town!flea to think that in the first place.
To the first sentence, I guess that view makes sense.In post 783, Flea The Magician wrote:It was ultimately crossed wires, and I was of the view the post had been skimmed, not read.In post 774, NDMath wrote:The Flea and Dragons interaction to me looks bad for flea because the accusation that dragons hadn't read the post was unfounded and there isn't a reason for town!flea to think that in the first place.
Was it just that bit looking bad for me or more of it? because that's a pretty naff bit to just be worth calling out.
I scum read it 'now' and I didn't see me voting for you this phase. Waiting to bring it up day 2 doesn't make any sense (to me at least), and I also wanted your reaction to see if it would change my mind.In post 792, Flea The Magician wrote:Calling me out just for that reason seems a little pointless and quite trivial, maybe later on during a case development. Why now?
I guess I disagree about you have townie posts, they definitely don't outweigh minivirgo's reactions.In post 1071, Andante wrote:In post 1062, NDMath wrote:Not much to say right now.
I don't think T3's vote is scum-indicative; we need to get an elim in.
Andante technically should be roleclaiming but I struggle to see it mattering.
Voting me, cause "we need to get an elim in" is the absolute worst reason to vote me, I feel like I've had some pretty damn towny post since entering, and I've done way more than N_M who has been here, and T3 is still catching up I guess?
What logical sense does it make, as town, to yeet me off when I'm a significant contributor
I understand we want an elim here, but of all the people you could elim, do you really want me?
I think there's solid odds of a desperado?In post 1354, DkKoba wrote:If youre hammering thats a declaration you want that slot dead not a "its optimal to lim here" thing because its 14 rn
I think that also applies to a scumflip.In post 1358, flow trap wrote:If this flips town DK is more likely to be town tbh
Who would you define as having pushed it?In post 1405, DkKoba wrote:t3 was hard town. it was an embarassment that he was limmed and most definitely scum pushed.
Pretty much lolIn post 1411, DkKoba wrote:so is consensus that im basically clear here?
Can you elaborate on why you're townreading Flea?In post 1414, VFP wrote:I don't think Andante or Flea are scum here. I also don't think that this is an all town wagon.In post 1373, Raya36 wrote:T3(8): flow trap,GrandpaMo, Artemiana, Save the Dragons,Not_Mafia, Andante, Flea the Magician, VFP ELIMINATION
Flow / Art / Dragons
DMG / Yessiree / Dragon from Grampa's reads.
Dragon
Art
Flow
DMG
Yessiree
Thats the order I'd lim right now.
This is a type of post scum make a lot post-hammer.In post 1404, yessiree wrote:you guys limmed this?In post 1011, T3 wrote:best defense 2021: i'm town
You monsters
Yeah, I think their eod1 was townie; they handled being wagoned well. Their reads looked genuine to me. Their engagement today has also been strong.In post 1529, VFP wrote:Anyone town reading Dragon here?
"depending on how the day goes", "basically null right now"In post 1557, VFP wrote:We're aiming for scum day 2. What makes Arte and Rob a decent vote to get scum?In post 1556, NDMath wrote:Yeah, I think their eod1 was townie; they handled being wagoned well. Their reads looked genuine to me. Their engagement today has also been strong.
I'd rather elim today somewhere in {Yes, Flea, DMG, Arte, Rob} depending on how day goes. Last three are basically null reads right now, two being absent day1 and DMG just hasn't left much of an impression on me.
And why is Yessiree scum here?
Keep in mind I'm going by this post as well.In post 195, NDMath wrote:Jackson explained the most of it.Reads based off activity are generally lazy, and specifically so on a slot that hasn't posted at all (where that reason is very very likely to not be game related.)
In post 1517, yessiree wrote:I will get back to you on this after I figure out who replaced whoIn post 1508, Save The Dragons wrote:yessiree, who are you scum reading?
Asking for a reason for me. And how you went from "scum hardpushed T3 elim" to the rest of this pool?In post 1744, DkKoba wrote:std.In post 1738, Andante wrote:who are you wanting here?
Dmg possibily if they dont come back and start solving- i know whos in the slot.
I think 3rd scum maybe ndmath if it's neither flow or you
Andante was my top scumread at the time (not anymore of course), and I thought the elim was nearly locked in (it was morning of the deadline).In post 1839, MathBlade wrote:I don’t like this post. Assuming Andante is town, NDMath is kinda putting out a hopeless vibe. He should have either been wagoning or pushing Andante harder or trying to find someone else who could have been elimmed. The shade of T3 is also horrible.In post 1062, NDMath wrote:Not much to say right now.
I don't think T3's vote is scum-indicative; we need to get an elim in.
Andante technically should be roleclaiming but I struggle to see it mattering.
VOTE: NDMath
I'm confused by the first paragraph, I was saying that T3's vote was fine because we need to get an elim in. I don't understand how you're getting that implication.In post 1852, MathBlade wrote:Reads like shade to me. I don’t think what T3 is scum indicative (but) we need to get an elim in. The implication is T3 is an acceptable elim kinda a have to.
Why are you focused more on defense instead of convincing people yes is scum? Seems odd you seemed more focused on me than getting support for your wagon.
Can you elaborate? I thought this was one of yes's better posts.In post 1906, Robert M Hunter wrote:VOTE: yessireeIn post 1891, yessiree wrote:w o w, has McToughGuy entered the building?In post 1876, MathBlade wrote:Because your reads are shit?
Help me “bus” yes then or explain. (Bus is in quotes as I can’t bus)
If I had two votes I would be voting ND and Yes but alas I do not.
You should look in a mirror, tough guy, because that's what I think about your "reads" (reads is in quotes since they're fake reads).
You picked one post from NDMath yesterday as the sole basis for your scumread on him, one vote from him on me as your sole basis of his "bus" and then picked 2 other players to be in your poe pool that were generally already been scumread by other slots. Seems to me you just faked a bunch of low quality reads devoid of any deeper thought process.
There, that's one of my reads. I've met my quota for the weekend, boss. Now if you'll excuse me...
I can no longer suffer this scum to live another day.
Who is A? If it's Andante why do you think they would've been the preferred nk night 1??In post 1918, MathBlade wrote:Paused on where Koba claimed PR. There have been multiple softs/claims of PR from N1 during my skim. Pretty confused why the N1 shot died unless they thought he was going to heal A. So A is lock town.
Since Koba and Flow and A are all claimed to be/are combinations of PR/likely/conf town that means an elim there isn’t beneficial. Gonna seem like a game of chess.
First Part: I'd argue the context I provided you should be considered when looking at the meaning, and is also part of 'what was there'. I also don't like you saying I didn't say what I clearly did say, but agree to drop it.In post 1941, MathBlade wrote:Responding inline underline is me
In post 1937, NDMath wrote:I'm confused by the first paragraph, I was saying that T3's vote was fine because we need to get an elim in. I don't understand how you're getting that implication.In post 1852, MathBlade wrote:Reads like shade to me. I don’t think what T3 is scum indicative (but) we need to get an elim in. The implication is T3 is an acceptable elim kinda a have to.
Why are you focused more on defense instead of convincing people yes is scum? Seems odd you seemed more focused on me than getting support for your wagon.
I'm also trying to better understand why you scumread me to get a read on you since your previous slotholder didn't do much.
I mean I broke it down grammatically word by word what was there. Considering VFP I am willing to let this go as arguing sentence structure is not helpful but it’s quite literally not what you said. I am an extremely literal person and that rubbed me the wrong way. While catching up VFP strikes me as the more likely scum here of you and VFP
Who is A? If it's Andante why do you think they would've been the preferred nk night 1??In post 1918, MathBlade wrote:Paused on where Koba claimed PR. There have been multiple softs/claims of PR from N1 during my skim. Pretty confused why the N1 shot died unless they thought he was going to heal A. So A is lock town.
Since Koba and Flow and A are all claimed to be/are combinations of PR/likely/conf town that means an elim there isn’t beneficial. Gonna seem like a game of chess.
I apologize. I ran thoughts together. It seems like VFP is running off a town block. Using how town blocks are supposed to be used VFP should be freaking out where his reads are wrong or hypothesizing the exact scum team based off townreading nearly everyone else alive. VFP should be leading/pushing and instead all VFP does is some half assed threat. Koba and A50 know me and know that if you threaten me that will only cause me to look at you more not less. Not sure what VFP’s goal is here but I don’t see any solving going on. Just random “x is town” posts.@VFP who is scum?And yes A is Andante. That wasn’t towards A being the nightkill N1 but it’s more towards A is lock town and VFP isn’t leveraging that or trying to work with A and simple math means VFP should be happy/excited/doing something.
I generally enjoy playing scum more than town; just had busy real-life stuff during that game leading me to replace out.In post 2010, DkKoba wrote:he doesnt like playing scum too much and was not so motivated when i played with him.
The votecount does suggest you're town, but I think that's just because the two near conf towns are currently voting me.In post 2088, yessiree wrote: ND isn't all up in my face like "convince me you're not scum." or "who's scum? where's your reads? huh huh huh huh". He has been here the whole time and has all the necessary gamestate context to scumread me at the moment. Doesn't mean he's not wrong.
N_M shot a townie because he was an additional death and as a desperado dies instead of his target if he targets town. We think Andante was targeted based off N_M's iso. The only living claimed player is flowtrap.In post 2110, Almost50 wrote:The funny part is nobody still cared to explain ANYTHING to me. What are the cases on X, Y & Z (aside from the one on me)? Why are you semi-confirmed? Did we have any claims? I feel like I'm talking behind some soundproof glass wall where you all can see me but no one can hear me. Problem is I'm doing it in writing/typing and not actually talking! Maybe my typing is in Invisible inkIn post 2106, Andante wrote:I mean, I'll happily go back to A50 lol, everyone just seemed to auto TR them for coming in and yelling about how they don't care to read..
Somewhat quiet is scum-indicative because ?In post 2111, flow trap wrote: Idk anything else aside from NDM being somewhat quiet
Do you think his play today is scummy or are you just carrying over a scumread from DMG? (your iso is unclear)In post 2113, Andante wrote:ughhh I like ndmath way more than A50 right now... I know there's more than 1 scum, but A50 is the only one I really wanna flip
This logic is wonky. (I inserted dashes.) The middle part is completely unrelated to the argument of the post. The actual logic is just 'A50 is the best elim because Andante, the most conf player of the townblock, chose it'. This is flawed since it assumes she has above average reads. It should be considered of course but it shouldn't be automatic elim that scumread.In post 2145, MathBlade wrote:Exactly. A50 is a much better elim even in the worse case we are wrong.
Andante gets his elim as lock town.
---
Then if scum kill say flow for example to prevent him confirming himself we keep a prob lock town in Adante for the next day.
But if scum kill Adante and flow doesn’t confirm himself then two days no confirm suspicion goes really high.
This also enables PRs to do what they need unimpeded.
---
If we elim ND or yes we are conceding control away from the town block which is not how town blocks work which means one if not both of ND/yes are likely town.
I don't see anything in N_M's iso indicating he was scumreading Flow?DkKoba wrote:if yesiree flips town im unclearing andante and believing more that flow is the one who got desperado'd bc NM played against scum flow recently and we were scumreading him here too
VOTE: dkkobaIn post 2186, DkKoba wrote:mathblade and I are clear ty
Pretty sure it's a statement about you leading the wagon on A50 and trying to lump themself in too.In post 2203, MathBlade wrote:Why do you think scum!Koba tries to clear me out of the gate as scum?
Neither strategy makes sense for scum.
ND fake claiming a guilty on Koba seems dumb because we elim them the next day.
Koba faking a inno on me seems dumb when we said watchers on flow.
I just think Kona’s better than that. So I am confused.
That was a wifom claim; doesn't mean anything especially from koba.In post 2210, MathBlade wrote: Possibly but they claimed PR early.
I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.
We know they were online from trying to clear me.
Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional
Yes it's a hardclaimDkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.
I means from scumteam's perspective odds are there isn't a watcher. Koba probably thought they could still force an elim on andante or something.In post 2239, MathBlade wrote:Because I don’t see why Koba scum kills someone being watchedIn post 2236, NDMath wrote:I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.
We know they were online from trying to clear me.
Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional
Yes it's a hardclaimDkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.
I was at Robert>Yes>Flea but Robert's voted you already so it's probably yessiree like andante is saying.In post 2246, DkKoba wrote:who's my partner?
Hey you're writing the argument for me.DkKoba wrote:nahh but ndmath really thought that he could frame me as:
leading kill
killing flow trap
not killing mathblade
like no?
I'm confused by what you mean by no watcher. If I were a scumwatcher there would still be the possibility of a town watcher.In post 2374, MathBlade wrote:This is a blatant misrep.In post 2373, Andante wrote:In post 2372, VFP wrote:If me and Dk are scum together then ND is 100% a Watcher.In post 2367, Andante wrote:you keep saying this... there's literally no guarantee we have a watcher
If I were scum I would have killed Flow for the record.
Mainly to see if it clears not having a Watcher to use as an advantage.
If Dk said no to me in scum chat I'd call them chicken and they would go along with it.
This would have back fired on us, but in the long run we tried a risky play.
It is actually highly likely that me and Dk are scum buddies here. I will be willing to sacrifice my buddy before me as well.
I meant it like, maf don't know for sure if there's a watcher, so they can easily just hit flow... Blade is acting like maf knew for sure there was one
What I am saying is that multiple players all of whom cannot be scum suggested to watch flow.
That means that it is likely scum would not kill flow. The fact they did means either no watcher or planned substandard kill. Considering they just lost A50 the first is more likely.
I'm obviously biased but I don't see much impressive.In post 2395, MathBlade wrote:I am kinda wanting to elim ND because Koba’s really seeming to wim than ND
There was only one visitor on flow, their message could not have been redirected.In post 2404, MathBlade wrote:I think scum would redirect flow onto themselves or flow forgot.
The reason being is that if they have flow eat the message if someone was a jailkeeper or roleblocker or doctor that saved flow then flow still looks bad. That’s my hunch. Admittedly can’t prove it as no access to scum PT but redirect flow to himself makes sense
Though they really should have just let flow send the message. Flow was obvTown anyway damage minimal.
Same point as above, having two scum visit the kill is a highly risky play and should be apparent as not the case with the speed I claimed the watcher result.In post 2405, Save The Dragons wrote:thinking out loud here
the watcher claim by scum!ND seems dangerous because if there's a(nother) watcher they'd be on flow, they'd be able to say they didn't see ND on flow thus proving ND a liar pretty quick. that makes me think scum or town, ND is a watcher and probably watched flow last night.
if scum have a redirector and used it on flow to gain his message, then it's ND as a watcher so the other scum would be a redirector. i'm having trouble seeing them not just redirecting to scum and letting flow take heat for the message.
they'd have to know not_mafia was a desparado though to redirect his target from Andante to some one else. that seems rather unlikely, and it seems unlikely that N_M killed desparado'd someone else on purpose, so i think Andante is pretty safe for me.
i don't find the scum redirector theory very likely at this juncture
Ignoring the mech stuff, what are those thoughts?Robert M Hunter wrote:YeahIn post 2406, Save The Dragons wrote:robert do you have any thoughts besides voting koba
I have no idea what's happening with redirectors and all that mechanical stuff, I need it explained slowly.
In post 2414, DkKoba wrote:how am i omgusing robert? Quote it ndmath cmon.
In post 2416, DkKoba wrote:Explain where i omgus rather than explain that they are the most likely partner based on poe
There's multiple posts of this, but koba's been trying to reframe the conversation to be entirely about dayplay when it isn't because of the hardguilty.In post 2464, DkKoba wrote:i think everyone here should like say what their read on NDmath/me is without considering the claimed result as a reason, as it is just a 50/50. NDmath was an extremely likely elimination here today without their gambit here - so it should be a null point anyways.
In post 2484, DkKoba wrote:btw - ndmath went from saying Robert is PoE to this.In post 2192, NDMath wrote:VOTE: dkkobaIn post 2186, DkKoba wrote:mathblade and I are clear ty
I'm 1-Shot Watcher, koba was the only visitor lol.
I'd imagine that {Robert, Yes, Flea} is the gamewinning poe since two bussers could have easily instead got yes or me elim'd yesterday.
also NDMath, any crumbs of being watcher?
i know for a fact town you does crumb you are a player to do that. i know you didnt because you are fake watcher but lets see you confirm there is no crumb esp when you were on the chopping block and a likely lim.
In these two posts koba is literally just making stuff up; this is their first game playing with town!me. And I don't crumb, especially in (semi)opens, so I have no idea how koba "knows for a fact" the opposite.In post 2499, DkKoba wrote:like i said - force ndmath to participate and show their colors. ive already explained many times over that ndmath has been way too shallow in relation to actual town!ndmath meta. town ndmath is way more decriptive in their read depth.
the fact ndmath like even has a pretend poe solve right away is crazy actually i just thought of this - like lets PRETEND ndmath actually is a legit watcher and they saw scum me visit flow. why does ndmath expect me to be there - why are they not surprised? why is their tone like matter of fact, like its something they expected + they even betray this tone with the poe they already had right there ready to go. town perspective there is to be more focused on how incredulous it is first and not have a team prepared there.
In post 2546, Flea The Magician wrote: OK so 1) Its evident you're scumreading me, yay I love it.
2) Why? I want some meat to go with the bones at least. Give me fluff and amma yeet you, what you've given is bearly bones.
3) Convince me why to vote koba instead of just the guilty.
You are severely overestimating my confidence level in you being scum, and I am not sure why.In post 2547, Flea The Magician wrote:4) Why if you're so keen on me being the last scum, do you want my thoughts on this rather amusing 1vs1?
(Another error is that in the mod PT you have that 1 scum was on the T3 wagon when there were actually 0.)In post 2721, Raya36 wrote:I am always looking for constructive criticism for how I mod and what I can do to make the game more enjoyable. Besides the error of course please let me know anything I could have done better.