VOTE: Entchant
-Mistress
VOTE: Titus
Are you the other arsonist?In post 37, Ircher wrote:Wagons are a good way. How about a Don Draper one?
Nope, I think Titus’s sr on me doesn’t make a lot of sense. And Ircher wanting to wagon me for pretty much no reason is hella scummy. If at least one of them isn’t an arsonist pushing us, I’ll be shocked.In post 40, furtiveglance wrote:Page 2 gamesolve, slacking much?In post 39, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Are you the other arsonist?In post 37, Ircher wrote:Wagons are a good way. How about a Don Draper one?
Titus and Ircher are my current guess for scum.
This post is also suspicious. If you’re actually a tree, you don’t go out of your way to imply that because you don’t want to out who could possibly be firefighter unless you’re getting run up.In post 11, Titus wrote:Is it bad that I almost want to get axed so I csn say the game stumped me?
VOTE: Herta[/vote[
There isn’t but suggesting a wagon on me for literally no reason is hella scummy don’t you think?In post 44, Vanderscamp wrote:I see that it is.
Is there some history between you two where Ircher frequently goes after you as scum?
What do you expect me to be doing at this early stage ib the game and how is it in anyway unusual for me to be suss on anyone who either votes or advocates wagonong me for no good reason? This makes me even more confident on this read because you know there is nothing unusual about my reaction.In post 45, Titus wrote:What does the stump mechanic have to deal with my expectations for you? Even now, you aren't doing much. Your two scumreads happen to be the two people voting you.In post 38, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:VOTE: Titus
Day literally just started and you yourself noted the stump mechanic, so dislike your reasoning.
In post 60, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:In post 42, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:This post is also suspicious. If you’re actually a tree, you don’t go out of your way to imply that because you don’t want to out who could possibly be firefighter unless you’re getting run up.In post 11, Titus wrote:Is it bad that I almost want to get axed so I csn say the game stumped me?
VOTE: Herta[/vote[I find you both invoking the stump mechanic and now asking me how it’s a possible factor in this game kind of disingenuous if not a possibility attempt at role fishing.In post 45, Titus wrote:What does the stump mechanic have to deal with my expectations for you? Even now, you aren't doing much. Your two scumreads happen to be the two people voting you.In post 38, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:VOTE: Titus
Day literally just started and you yourself noted the stump mechanic, so dislike your reasoning.
I am doing plenty for this stage of the game and you pushing me on that us extremely suspicious.
I’m never unvoting you in this game. I don’t believe town!you has this ubershitty read on me here.In post 64, Titus wrote:Yeah Nancy's scum. Nancy's aware of the mechanic and tries to accuse me of rolefishing.
I'll just leave this vote here and suppose the partner is likely one of the Ircher voters for now.
bad vote Smokey.
I definitely believe you’re not Pooky now because he actually has reads that are good.
If there’s a good reason for it, then it’s obviously different but I’m way more confident on Titus being scum here because town!her is never this terrible at reading me. Maybe she’s tunnelling me because I caught her in Double Agency? I don’t know but I really do think she’s very likely scum here, because her pushing me here for God only knows what reason makes absolutely no sense. Only thing that’s giving me any pause at all is that she’s not pocketing me instead and preferring to nk me but that’s why I think it looks more like possible role fishing to me because she’s probably counting on that to happen if she can get enough votes on me. I think she’s trying to find out if I’m a tree or firefighter, which is why she’s refusing to try to reacess me in the slightest.In post 63, Vanderscamp wrote:In post 58, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:What do you expect me to be doing at this early stage ib the game and how is it in anyway unusual for me to be suss on anyone who either votes or advocates wagonong me for no good reason? This makes me even more confident on this read because you know there is nothing unusual about my reaction.In post 45, Titus wrote:What does the stump mechanic have to deal with my expectations for you? Even now, you aren't doing much. Your two scumreads happen to be the two people voting you.In post 38, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:VOTE: Titus
Day literally just started and you yourself noted the stump mechanic, so dislike your reasoning.
I feel like there's always one player each game who hard OMGUSes an RVS vote, so I don't think your reaction is super scummy, but I also just don't really get the perspective.
If someone suggested wagoning someone else would you still hate it or is it just because it's you?
Why is Porkens scum?In post 46, Ircher wrote:If not Draper, how about Porkens?
Both of these posts are just simply unbelievable and scummy. Titus’ sole reasoning is I’m not doing enough. I call bullshit,In post 45, Titus wrote:What does the stump mechanic have to deal with my expectations for you? Even now, you aren't doing much. Your two scumreads happen to be the two people voting you.In post 38, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:VOTE: Titus
Day literally just started and you yourself noted the stump mechanic, so dislike your reasoning.
I don’t know. I’m not a fan of Ircher but both of them seems too easy but I think Titus’ post about the stump thing is extremely antitown at best. You don’t want to hint you’re a tree if you’re an actual tree and I’m not doing enough is just beyond lame. Why it’s scummy is because Titus initially tries to hint at her being a tree but then says she sr me for understanding the mechanic and accusing her of rolefishing because that’s what it looks like to me. And why wouldn’t I understand this mechanic? I’ve played this game before also as town but under a different account.In post 71, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:OKAY. WHO IS THE PARTNER TO TITUS IF THEY ARE ARSONIST? UNVOTE: DON DRAPE
I’m not voting anywhere but Titus because I don’t believe she has this bad a take as town. I also think her post about being stumped is hella suspicious too.
In post 11, Titus wrote:Is it bad that I almost want to get axed so I csn say the game stumped me?
VOTE: Herta[/vote[
Also why this vote? No explanation whatsoever?
I’m voting my strongest scumread, so she’s currently my best guess at being arsonist and I do think she’s trying to rolefish me.In post 80, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:DO YOU HAVE DETAILED KNOWLEDGE OF THE IRCHER TREE? IS THIS ONE LIKELY TO CONTAIN AN ARSONIST?In post 76, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I’m not a fan of Ircher but both of them seems too easy but I think Titus’ post about the stump thing is extremely antitown at best.
Interesting. I could see arsonist!Titus possible naked voting a buddy like that but I’d want to heat more. What do you dislike about Vanderscamp?In post 84, furtiveglance wrote:Herta, Porkens, Titus and Vanderscamp has 2 Arsonists.
Even if she never made such a ridiculous vote on me, I would still find this post hella suss. Anyone who’s an actual tree doesn’t want to go out of their way to hint at that because they shouldn’t want to help scum figure out who the firefighter is, so I find this post independently scummy.In post 11, Titus wrote:Is it bad that I almost want to get axed so I csn say the game stumped me?
VOTE: Herta[/vote[
Ircher frequently gets miselimmed and if I’m right about Titus, he doesn’t look like a buddy based off her post saying an Ircher voter is my buddy.In post 88, furtiveglance wrote:Vanderscamp is just being reasonable and asking questions, not really towny or scummy, but the vote on Ircher looked a bit quick to me, I don't think Ircher is an Arsonist
They don’t look aligned from this.In post 64, Titus wrote:Yeah Nancy's scum. Nancy's aware of the mechanic and tries to accuse me of rolefishing.
I'll just leave this vote here andsuppose the partner is likely one of the Ircher voters for now.
I can’t say, I’m currently nullreading them but I don’t like Ircher being at E-1. In SS’ game, a player was put to e-1 and self-hammered on d1, they were town. Early day 1 flashwagons more than not tend to be town. I don’t see any reason to rush the vote regardless.In post 93, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:SO DOES THIS POST MAKE PORKENS TREE GOOD OR BAD?
I think furtive is town.In post 94, furtiveglance wrote:No, it doesn't. Could go either way = into the poe you go. Makes sense to me.In post 90, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:DOES THAT FENCE HURT?In post 88, furtiveglance wrote:Vanderscamp is just being reasonable and asking questions, not really towny or scummy, but the vote on Ircher looked a bit quick to me, I don't think Ircher is an Arsonist
My point is that Pooky’s very good at reading me.In post 97, Vanderscamp wrote:What do you think you've done that should make anyone get a read on you?In post 68, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I definitely believe you’re not Pooky now because he actually has reads that are good.
I didn’t like him initially advocating wagonning me but I don’t know anymore. As I already explained from Titus’ post, they don’t look aligned.In post 99, Vanderscamp wrote:In post 87, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Interesting. I could see arsonist!Titus possible naked voting a buddy like that but I’d want to heat more. What do you dislike about Vanderscamp?In post 84, furtiveglance wrote:Herta, Porkens, Titus and Vanderscamp has 2 Arsonists.
He’s obviously incorrect to characterize Titus’ vote on me as rvs but I think Titus is extremely likely to be scum because she tends to be a lot less tunnelled as town, especially this early. She pushed a town pr really hard in some game where she was scum in a game with town!Math, so this is more likely than not, her scum meta here.
Yeah I think I was conflating Ircher's comment on you which you also responded negatively to.
In my mind it's fairly similar, it's more the sentiment of hard omgusing someone super early and creating this death tunnel which I don't find super productive.
Ircher has some familiarity with my meta, so I’m currently on the fence about that and who exactly is “anyone”? Ircher only advocated wagonnong me after Titus made that ridiculous vote on me. One player /= ANYONE.In post 100, Vanderscamp wrote:Why not?In post 88, furtiveglance wrote:Vanderscamp is just being reasonable and asking questions, not really towny or scummy, but the vote on Ircher looked a bit quick to me, I don't think Ircher is an Arsonist
I can buy not agreeing with me but I can't imagine why anyone would have a town read there. I think Ircher is easily the scummiest person in the thread atm for seeing what Don Draper was doing to anyone who expressed any kind of suspicion on them at all and then just backing out.
To me that implies the wagon was less important to Ircher than how they are perceived in thread.
Sorry I had some more creative descriptors like how scummy it was that I hadn’t yet built any schools for the underprivileged in third world countries by page 2 but noted.In post 106, Aisa wrote:In post 66, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:ubershitty readJust a small reminder to avoid using this sort of language too often. I understand it happens every now and then.
I thought both reactions looked scummy to me: Titus voting me for not doing enough by page freaking 2 and Ircher for apparently no reason whatsoever, advocating wagoning us and I still think this. I no longer think they look aligned like I’ve said recently.In post 107, Vanderscamp wrote:When Ircher talked about doing a different wagon you had called the two people who put any pressure on you at all the scum team, for the reason that they had put pressure on you.In post 104, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Ircher has some familiarity with my meta, so I’m currently on the fence about that and who exactly is “anyone”? Ircher only advocated wagonnong me after Titus made that ridiculous vote on me. One player /= ANYONE.In post 100, Vanderscamp wrote:Why not?In post 88, furtiveglance wrote:Vanderscamp is just being reasonable and asking questions, not really towny or scummy, but the vote on Ircher looked a bit quick to me, I don't think Ircher is an Arsonist
I can buy not agreeing with me but I can't imagine why anyone would have a town read there. I think Ircher is easily the scummiest person in the thread atm for seeing what Don Draper was doing to anyone who expressed any kind of suspicion on them at all and then just backing out.
To me that implies the wagon was less important to Ircher than how they are perceived in thread.
If Titus flipped scum right now I'd think the interaction makes Ircher look slightly better but I don't think it's obvious.
It’s a meta read.In post 108, Vanderscamp wrote:So what have you done that you think Pooky should read you correctly for?In post 102, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:My point is that Pooky’s very good at reading me.In post 97, Vanderscamp wrote:What do you think you've done that should make anyone get a read on you?In post 68, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I definitely believe you’re not Pooky now because he actually has reads that are good.
It’s seriously scummy to hint you’re a tree in this setup. It’s the combination of both. It’s not ____ RVS. RVS is nonsensical votes like DD was an adulterer on Mad Man but you phrased it very clearly NOT like one, so I would thank you to stop insulting my intelligence with this.In post 111, Titus wrote:This post is a reason Nancy's scum. She automatically believes that I am automatically telling the truth or scum.In post 89, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Even if she never made such a ridiculous vote on me, I would still find this post hella suss. Anyone who’s an actual tree doesn’t want to go out of their way to hint at that because they shouldn’t want to help scum figure out who the firefighter is, so I find this post independently scummy.In post 11, Titus wrote:Is it bad that I almost want to get axed so I csn say the game stumped me?
VOTE: Herta[/vote[
She also implies an RVS vote needs a reason. Nancy stretching so hard she should start a gym.
Oh but what happened to all the schools in Africa I have yet to build?In post 113, Titus wrote:Yeah, Vanderscamp is the partner.In post 101, Vanderscamp wrote:I think Titus is scummier than Don and they're pretty clearly not together. But I could def see this as town vs town
Sign seal deliver.
Willing to do either today.
Your read on us. *mic drop*In post 117, Titus wrote:Nancy joke? How? Where? Punchline?
Enchant is often a hard slot to parse. He’s currently a null for me.
If there’s a world where Titus is actually moonlogicy tunnelled town here. then I probably wouldn’t trust their reads in much. I don’t really have an opinion on Vanderscamp yet. I previously played with him in Koba’s neighbour game. Yes, I’m Loki.In post 123, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:In post 95, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I can’t say, I’m currently nullreading them but I don’t like Ircher being at E-1. In SS’ game, a player was put to e-1 and self-hammered on d1, they were town. Early day 1 flashwagons more than not tend to be town. I don’t see any reason to rush the vote regardless.In post 93, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:SO DOES THIS POST MAKE PORKENS TREE GOOD OR BAD?
I THINK AN ARSONIST MAY CHOOSE TO HIDE AS A NULLTREE. I THINK ENCHANT AND PORKENS NEED TO TAKE BETTER CARE OF OUR FOREST.
I AM PROBABLY 50‰ ACCURATE IN PORKENS - ENCHANT.
. I CAN WAIT FOR A THIRD READ TO TRY FOR 66% AND THEN YOU CAN PICK, OR YOU CAN PICK 1 OF THESE 2 NOW. I HAVE NO PREFERENCE.
ABC OF SAFETY: ALWAYS BE CAUTIOUS!In post 110, Titus wrote:I'll give you Vanderscamp as possible scum here. Hard to explain but I don't like their posturing and they were on the fast Ircher wagon. Feels like they want anyone and are floating.In post 84, furtiveglance wrote:Herta, Porkens, Titus and Vanderscamp has 2 Arsonists.
I THOUGHT THIS TOO UNTIL I STARED AT THEIR ISO FOR LIKE 20 MINUTES.
I guess it’s possible? Do you really think Titus can be this terrible at reading me?In post 125, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Uhh page 2 and Nancy already made our slot obv-town
What's up folk
Down to vote obvArsonist Ircher.
-Mistress
Is this accurate? I thought Ircher had changed his vote?
Because it’s antitown af. It’s the same reason no tress should out they’re trees. Scum wants to kill the firefighter obviously.In post 140, Enchant wrote:Remind me, why Firefighter should't claim D1 in this setup.
I told Auro in discord I think you’re scum. He hasn’t responded but obviously he thinks it’s Ircher. I have no clue.In post 141, Titus wrote:Yeah, no and no.In post 125, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Uhh page 2 and Nancy already made our slot obv-town
What's up folk
Down to vote obvArsonist Ircher.
-Mistress
What's your read on me?
I prefer we not rush the day.In post 144, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:I'M OKAY WITH ELIMINATING PORKENS IF WE PREFER TO GO FAST
lmfaooooIn post 154, furtiveglance wrote:I think these reads are ubergrittyIn post 130, Porkens wrote:I think smooky is right: lurkers and fluffed. Enchant an herta are my picks. VOTE: enchant
Vanderscamp doesn’t sound really completely different here than in the neighbour game. He also gave me __ in that for omgussing nearly every player who sr me. I would really like to discuss with Auro his Ircher read before I do anything. I’m still not convinced that Titus is this bad at reading me.In post 157, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:HEY MISTRESS DO YOU WANT TO DOGPILE ON VANDER? I AM RUNNING OUT OF SUSPECTS. IM DOWN TO VANDER AND PORKENS.
Well, there’s no reason to rush this vote. I still haven’t made up my mind on Ircher. I honestly can’t tell if he’s a miselim or arsonist at this point, so I’d prefer to wait until I have at least some clarity on that.In post 161, Herta wrote:I feel like scrrrd bear is bullying their way to a lim on someone regardless of who it is.
Okay, good with keeping my vote on you then.In post 162, Titus wrote:You are too busy lighting buildings on fire.In post 159, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Oh but what happened to all the schools in Africa I have yet to build?In post 113, Titus wrote:Yeah, Vanderscamp is the partner.In post 101, Vanderscamp wrote:I think Titus is scummier than Don and they're pretty clearly not together. But I could def see this as town vs town
Sign seal deliver.
Willing to do either today.
Also, if you took 11 as a serious claim or Huerta vote as non RVS lol. Those "reasons" were fabricated after I FoSed you. We all know you respond in real time.
Idk maybe? But he did give me s__t in that game and he also eventually came to tr me in that too. I think scum is more likely to have an agenda.In post 169, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:I THINK NOT HAVING AN OPINION MIGHT BE THE KIND OF TREE THE ARSONIST APPEARS TO BEIn post 167, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:If there’s a world where Titus is actually moonlogicy tunnelled town here. then I probably wouldn’t trust their reads in much. I don’t really have an opinion on Vanderscamp yet. I previously played with him in Koba’s neighbour game. Yes, I’m Loki.
I don’t trust Titus’ reads whatever she actually is in this game, so she’s probably the very last player I’d confidently sheep here on anything.In post 174, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:I DON'T PREFER EITHER I SUSPECT BOTH NOW THROUGH POE. TITUS IS DOWN FOR VANDER SO I ASK DON X MISTRESS BECAUSE IF BOTH WANT THEN IT'S EASIER TO PUSH THROUGH.In post 173, furtiveglance wrote:I thought you wanted Porkens.....explain why you now prefer VanderIn post 157, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:HEY MISTRESS DO YOU WANT TO DOGPILE ON VANDER? I AM RUNNING OUT OF SUSPECTS. IM DOWN TO VANDER AND PORKENS.
I agree. I’m null on Enchant and slightly townleaning Herta.In post 175, furtiveglance wrote:Titus is sus though. Don't you agree that Enchant/Herta are bad scumreads?In post 174, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:I DON'T PREFER EITHER I SUSPECT BOTH NOW THROUGH POE. TITUS IS DOWN FOR VANDER SO I ASK DON X MISTRESS BECAUSE IF BOTH WANT THEN IT'S EASIER TO PUSH THROUGH.In post 173, furtiveglance wrote:I thought you wanted Porkens.....explain why you now prefer VanderIn post 157, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:HEY MISTRESS DO YOU WANT TO DOGPILE ON VANDER? I AM RUNNING OUT OF SUSPECTS. IM DOWN TO VANDER AND PORKENS.
???In post 183, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:MAYBE THIS IS A CLUEIn post 180, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:He also gave me __ in that for omgussing nearly every player who sr me.
When we initially created this account we switched gender roles for the lulz. Since the show is long now off the air, I abandoned the schtick but if Auro wants to sign all of his posts as “Mistress”, I'm not going to complain about it.In post 184, furtiveglance wrote:I assumed Auro would be Don and Nancy Mistress, just a random thought
I haven’t played with Vanders!scum but he did this in that neighbour game. It depends on what Ircher actually is here, because I don’t see either Porkens or Vanderscamp and Ircher likely being aligned.In post 187, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:MY OPINION IS THAT VANDER HAS AN AGENDA IN THIS GAME, THEY ARE JUST TRYING TO HIDE IT. I BELIEVE PORKENS-VANDER IS AT LEAST 50%.In post 185, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I think scum is more likely to have an agenda.
PEDIT:
I NOT SHEEP, I LISTEN. I HAVE POE LOCKDOWN ON PORKENS AND VANDER.
In post 46, Ircher wrote:If not Draper, how about Porkens?
In post 48, Ircher wrote:Well Draper is making this big fuss and all, so.......
Why are you still voting us then?In post 50, Ircher wrote:It's not, but it's also early. There is merit in looking elsewhere.
I find it extremely difficult to believe we’re wrong on you with this bad a take, because I would think it would be extremely obvious to town!you by now that we are, so this post doesn’t change anything for me at all.In post 202, Titus wrote:Yup. Hydra no dissonant reads. Only wants a prior wagoned slot and the player who solved the game.
I tr everyone but you Vander and Huerta. Porkens and scr are weak trs though.
In the uber rare event the hydra is town, that tells me plenty about votes today.
Both you and Ircher don’t look great to me. He hasn’t done any solving at all, so if I’m wrong on you, probably vote there.In post 204, Titus wrote:What are your reads if I am town?In post 203, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Actually if I’m right about Titus, Enchant’s vote on her would be town indicative for him because he usually jumps on players who push his buddies, so I oppose Enchant wagon.
And if you persist in the charade?