In post 1143, Momrangal wrote:In post 1081, Momrangal wrote:the way she's continually trying to hedgehorn my claim and usage as it as scum without thinking logically why, if I was trying to look town with my claim, and 'desire to look like a friendly neighbor" (not that she's wrong about) as being scum oriented while dismissing the fact that I am grossly overstepping that town read by explicitly claiming that I can send it too three.
Also if I simply wanted to look like a friendly neighbor then I would have just claimed so
In post 1087, Carrot and Stick wrote:In post 1081, Momrangal wrote:the way she's continually trying to hedgehorn my claim and usage as it as scum without thinking logically why, if I was trying to look town with my claim, and 'desire to look like a friendly neighbor" (not that she's wrong about) as being scum oriented while dismissing the fact that I am grossly overstepping that town read by explicitly claiming that I can send it too three.In post 1078, Carrot and Stick wrote:Momrangal's usage of the role could in theory come from town--but doing what she did would beincredibly sub-optimalusage of the role. It is a stretch of the imagination to believe she could use the role that terribly since it has very little in the way of justification. Why try to look town as town and do nothing more?
Momrangal's usage of the role has a clear motivation coming from scum--doing what she did makes perfect sense with her being scum, trying to falsely clear herself.
The same reasons why acryon's usage of his role were scum are the reasons why Momrangal's usage of her role was scum.In post 1081, Momrangal wrote:Also if I simply wanted to look like a friendly neighbor then I would have just claimed soIn post 1053, Carrot and Stick wrote:There is no role you could claim to send something that I would believe--especially given that I did not roleblock you.In post 1048, Momrangal wrote:Last night you should have gotten something, and you're ignoring it. Something that substantial proof that I'm not scum^Basically I made it rather clear and unambiguous that I would not believe a friendly neighbor claim from you and that it was a favored scum fakeclaim from your era of player. That killed any option of claiming to be one.In post 1057, Carrot and Stick wrote:(I don't see any world where Momrangal is town. Especially since what she is softclaiming is apparently a favorite fakeclaim from her era of players for some ungodly reason.)
In post 1143, Momrangal wrote:In post 1083, Momrangal wrote:As far as yesterday goes, she explicitly keeps stating that I'm ignoring her, and that I'm scum for that but she also overlooks the facts that, when she asked to do things for "town cred" I continually kept on doing it.
Not only that, I was overly cheeky on bussing my supposedly scum buddies she ignored it, as did every one else, but more importantly she should have been paranoid about that
In post 1092, Carrot and Stick wrote:Never addressing me when doing those things--still counts as ignoring me. You did those things with a detachment from me. You did those things without interacting with me. You didn't quote me when, say, voting acryon. You didn't give me a callout of something like, "hey mastina, I am doing the thing!". Nothing. Actions might speak louder than words, but they still need words connecting them.In post 1083, Momrangal wrote:As far as yesterday goes, she explicitly keeps stating that I'm ignoring her, and that I'm scum for that but she also overlooks the facts that, when she asked to do things for "town cred" I continually kept on doing it.
So yes.
You ignored me. Continuously. You acted as if all those things I asked you to do were being done not because I asked you to do them but because they were being done on your own initiative. The framing behind it is what makes the difference. You weren't trying to work with me. You were trying to placate me. You weren't trying to collaborate with me. You were trying to throw me off. Which you yourself admit:The fact you're self-aware about it does not change the inherent scumminess of the action. Trying to throw me off is still trying to throw me off is still trying to not have me latch onto the things I am right about.In post 1083, Momrangal wrote:Not only that, I was overly cheeky on bussing my supposedly scum buddies she ignored it
In post 1143, Momrangal wrote:In post 1084, Momrangal wrote:Also it isn't unheard of Town being a backup of a scum role. I've played in a game where that was the case which was another role madness game, though it was large its still proof that it isn't a stretch
In post 1096, Carrot and Stick wrote:Sure it isn't!In post 1084, Momrangal wrote:Also it isn't unheard of Town being a backup of a scum role.
It is incredibly, incredibly, incredibly uncommon though.
In Normals, it's all-but-explicitly banned. (Technically speaking you might be allowed a nurse/deputy of one alignment to the main role of the other, but this I near-guarantee you would never pass review no matter what other roles you have in the game; ironically enough, my theoretical hydra partner Assemblerotws actually attempted much this idea but I was one of the reviewers who shot it down, so. It's one of those things which is, "in theory not actually banned but in practice we're never letting this through", akin to trying an 8-PR setup with two VTs.)
In theme games?
How far back do you have to go to find one?
It's uncommon for a very fucking good reason. Because it is shitty game design. This was discussed in great length during Biochemistry Mafia. Town backups to a scum role are something which disproportionately punishes the scum and pushes the game to being far more swingy in favor of the town; scum backups to a town role are something which disproportionately punishes the town and pushes the game to being far more swingy in favor of the scum.
In other words.
This point by Momrangal is of the type which is "technically true and valid, but incredibly reachy". It's a stretch even she can't say with a straight face: how sure does "it isn't unheard of" sound to you? Of course it's not unheard of, but it's far from common. It's far from typical. If it were typical, she would say so. If it were something that happened often, she'd say it happened often. But no. She can't. Because it doesn't. So she instead has to say "it COULD be the case".
Yes, it could be the case.
Anything non-bastard could be the case.
Mathdino could be a scum bodyguard, that could in fact be the case.
Scum bodyguards are not in fact unheard of.
That doesn't mean Mathdino IS a scum bodyguard, now, does it?
Of course not.
This one I can't use a quote from my iso for though because admittedly I skipped it the first time. But my iso is open to all to read. I welcome it. Because what I've done is show why I think the players I am scumreading are scum. That's what's there...but it's not for me to judge what that's seen as.In post 1143, Momrangal wrote:In post 1089, Momrangal wrote:Not only are you trying to hedgehorn my words into something that is scum oriented, you're also doing it to A50 And you were doing it to Dino all of yesterday.