In post 622, OnTheMark wrote: In post 619, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 600, OnTheMark wrote: In post 584, Chara wrote: In post 579, OnTheMark wrote:That's not really how I expect someone who town reads another to disregard what they are saying. The Titus/Kiana question was more an after thought but I was mainly trying to get a feel for Cerb. (And yes I'm calling the slot Cerb until Drixx pops in. Deal.)
i would argue that scum RR pays
more
attention to how they answer questions, not less.
They did pay attention. The reaction was IDGAF. I wasn't saying they're not paying attention. It's that they are blatantly contradicting themselves. And I don't know where Cerb
actually
stands on mechanical issues or his reads. I want that to stop.
Also, you could actually ask me questions directly if you want to know where I stand on something. I think it's pretty clear where I stand on everything, and you're misreading a number of things I've said, either intentionally or due to some sort of bias, but I can certainly clarify stuff if you want to ask.
-Cerb
Do you value mechanics play or regular play?
Do you support the everyone vote for themselves plan?
Who are your top town and scumreads?
Let’s start there.
Define "regular" play. If you want to know how I play(which you should already know, and which should tell you what I value, but I'll gladly reiterate it to everyone): I enjoy mechanically breaking games and doing everything in my power to do the objectively optimal play in all situations, again, mechanically speaking. I attempt to create auto-win situations for myself, as either alignment. As far as reads go, I only value those parts of reads which can be documented, where you can lay out a logical set of reasons why x is why, based on actions taken.
In post 631, Shining Dreamers wrote:As for RR, the patented Phosphophyllite test is that unless they bring actual read to the main thread, you hang them and you look happy doing it. Not into any PTs alone. Into the main thread. You cannot fail in this way.
- Phosphophyllite
You're still my favorite Yume. <3 I don't actually think I've ever been secretive about a read in a PT and not expressed it in the main thread as well, eventually. There have been times where I've told one party I suspect someone while not acting like I suspect them in the main thread, in order to further a gambit(generally Drixx generated) of some sort, or vice versa, but the truth always comes out afterwards, regardless of alignment. I can appreciate your sentiment though.
In post 641, Venmar wrote: In post 617, Reasonably Rational wrote:^^ Also, I wrote up my response to your post in our hydra PT, but since nobody seems to care about your case or agree with you(so far), I won't bother posting it! <3
i'll actually be the devils advocate here cause im curious in your response. right now you're just smugly dismissing and discrediting the case.
That's because it's easy to dismiss, and OTM didn't ask for my response, only for that of those who TR me.
Anyways, that's 1!
-Cerb