"There are two ways to resolve puzzling situations: thoughtful contemplation or force. After thoughtful contemplation, most barbarians choose force."
Flavor Text : Break Open
Deadline
"There are two ways to resolve puzzling situations: thoughtful contemplation or force. After thoughtful contemplation, most barbarians choose force."
Flavor Text : Break Open
*grabs ear*
I have went through 100+ posts and I have yet to form a read on anyone (nor even parse how the whole game mechanics work, but that's another story).In post 109, Shining Dreamers wrote:I wanted to be scum because I'm stronger as scum. Why y no give me scum?
- Phosphophyllite
See now I am all kinds of confused. Tabor said not to scumread activity cases and now you are saying to do so. At this point it’s kinda clear y’all aren’t talking with each other and that could be causing some reasons for scumreading you.In post 651, Tibor and Lumia wrote:oh btw
OTM, you say I was feeling scumread for the wrong reason, but honestly activity is sometimes the right reason for me. As scum I have a tendency to flake out if I'm not into a game for some reason, whilst as town I might have more drive to try anyway. Creature can back me up on this, I had an offsite game where I was disengaged due to post volume + my "lover" partner (basically my mason if I had been town) not being around, but me finding an in-road and having an active partner made me more invested.
If any of them are scum it’s Venmar. I keep waffling in town and null for avenger but it’s enough not to push him today I think.In post 658, Tibor and Lumia wrote:Ah, interesting. I think I'm okay with my vote being on Chara rather than Venmar right now.In post 387, Chara wrote:...right. i knew that. because i received one. sorry about that.
also, i counterclaim Venmar's mana-farming method. wagon me instead.
Although what do you want to bet one of them is scum
~Lumia
I believe I responded to this? Tomorrow I can look it up.In post 646, Tibor and Lumia wrote:Hey OTM I recall you got on my case for not stating I wasn't going to be in thread for a while. What about this?In post 326, Tibor and Lumia wrote:Hi, guys. I didn't want to jump in when I am in the middle of work, but I would like to point out, Gamma and I had discussed yesterday in our PT that I should kind of take the reigns early on before he comes with his big catch ups and posts. I was in Court this morning and am now at work and need to mull over what's been said, probably re read and whatnot.
-Tibor
In post 450, OnTheMark wrote:It's what makes me scumread Sky.In post 444, Iconeum wrote:Really want to talk about this one! This is the one that makes me townread Skybird.In post 432, Maid Cafe wrote:worst post in the gameIn post 260, Skybird wrote:Right now, I feel like either Maid Cafe or OTM is scum, I'm not sure which one though leaning towards Maid Cafe. I didn't like 53 and 88 from them.
Tibor and Lumia ping town to me. That is a gut read.
Pre-edit: Thanks Phosphophyllite
He get's his opinion in on the 1v1 between Maid and OTM, takes a stance, and backs it with a reasoning.
I don't see it as a terrible post at all.
Ironically this response makes me nullread you.
Between prior reasons (one cited) and how manna did a reasonless attack on me I am pretty sure something weird is going on with manna and Skybird. Enough to wanna see where it leads.In post 582, OnTheMark wrote:Interesting...None of those are actually pushes. Maid Cafe was pushing me for a perceived wording issue far as I can tell. I still legit don't get it.In post 568, baku and munna wrote:1v1 with maid cafe, early townbloccing. nothing you were right on springs to mind.In post 530, OnTheMark wrote:Where do you think I am right and where do you think I am wrong?In post 524, baku and munna wrote:i got slight scum vibes from shining dreamers push on maid cafe. it seemed like they started from the position "we're pushing maid cafe" rather than either "we are looking at evidence for maid cafe's alignment" or "we think maid cafe is scum, what evidence supports this" but nothing too strong atm
Venmar is a 100% gut read. it could be bias but i think he is at the very least genuine in his opinions, and am leaning town.
Maid Cafe is that i was on their side in the pregame arguments making me think they were town.
OTM is playing misguided town to a T. A lot of wrong pushes but they genuinely believe them and are trying to solve the game.
However I don't see that as a wrong push...You said there was a lot of "wrong pushes" surely you can name one?
To me, there was something weird about their 1v1 with MC in the beginning which is what made me think one of them might be scum. But if one of them is, my vote is on MC. MC was stating earlier that he needs someone with no votes to vote them so they could get mana. (Post 566) That has been the case for them with Shining Dreamers since the first vote count. So why have they not voted SD and "gained" some mana?
Real talk, Gamma and I have repeatedly taken separate sides on whether lurking is NAI or not. So I still personally will not take it into account for anyone. But, if you want to use it as AI, there's nothing I can do to stop you, is there?In post 683, OnTheMark wrote:See now I am all kinds of confused. Tabor said not to scumread activity cases and now you are saying to do so. At this point it’s kinda clear y’all aren’t talking with each other and that could be causing some reasons for scumreading you.In post 651, Tibor and Lumia wrote:oh btw
OTM, you say I was feeling scumread for the wrong reason, but honestly activity is sometimes the right reason for me. As scum I have a tendency to flake out if I'm not into a game for some reason, whilst as town I might have more drive to try anyway. Creature can back me up on this, I had an offsite game where I was disengaged due to post volume + my "lover" partner (basically my mason if I had been town) not being around, but me finding an in-road and having an active partner made me more invested.
VOTE: Skybird
Chara, you saying this is very worrying, especially when it does not seem that you are joking! I hope you are reaction testing! Because this makes me very worried, it is the most absurd thing I have ever heard! Town should always make their best efforts to lynch scum, especially on Day 1! Correlation is not equal to causation; the only reason why the town loses after lynching scum correctly Day 1 is because the town was bad, and they got lucky Day 1, that's all! The only time we should ever lynch town Day 1 is if RC is in the game, then we lynch RC because he will be scum MVP.In post 477, Chara wrote:historically, a scum lynch on day 1 is actually worse for town. sometimes, it can work out wonderfully despite that. but for the most part, i'd call it bad. Maki knows what i mean.
therefore, seeing as my role powers up on town deaths, and a day 1 scum lynch is bad for town, i propose we collectively agree to lynch town. i know it sounds silly, but it makes sense. i hate seeing town do well on the first day only to tank every other.
VOTE: Mark
Oops. Sorry! I am not used to this! :<In post 472, Chara wrote:Kiana: it/its or they/them, please, especially if what you're doing is defending my honour. :>
Hi!In post 682, OnTheMark wrote:FYI it’s public info my main got outed since the micro finished.
I am MathBlade aka Roundabout on MU. I am alting to improve my play on MS and take some MU things that work here and because I wanna have an account separate the more I go on a life journey. Since it’s public knowledge on MU I don’t think it’s fair not to announce it here but I was hoping that micro would last a bit longer damn.
thought so!In post 682, OnTheMark wrote:FYI it’s public info my main got outed since the micro finished.
I am MathBlade aka Roundabout on MU. I am alting to improve my play on MS and take some MU things that work here and because I wanna have an account separate the more I go on a life journey. Since it’s public knowledge on MU I don’t think it’s fair not to announce it here but I was hoping that micro would last a bit longer damn.