Mother of Runes has Protection from Black.
Spells in play: (Champion of the Parish, Crusade) (Elemental) (Mother of Runes)
Spoiler: List of all Spells in play
Champion of the Parish
Creature
CREATURE SPELLS MAY BE CAST DURING ANY PHASE.
THIS SPELL COSTS one White mana to cast.
Creature spells have public effects and stay in effect until removed from the game.
This creature gains votes equal to the number of creatures you control.
This creature's total casting cost is equal to the number of creatures you control.
I stand for every cobbler, tamer, and fool in this town--and they stand for me.
Crusade
Enchantment
ENCHANTMENT SPELLS MAY BE CAST DURING ANY PHASE.
This spell costs two white mana to cast.
Enchantment spells have public effects and stay in effect until removed from the game.
Any time a White Creature votes for a player, an extra vote is added.
Finally, I understand. Home isn't where you rest.
It's what you fight for.
Elemental
Creature
Creature spells have public effects and stay in effect until removed from the game.
This Creature may vote.
Mother of Runes
Creature
Creature SPELLS MAY BE CAST DURING ANY PHASE.
This spell costs one White mana to cast.
Creature spells have public effects and stay in effect until removed from the game.
When you cast this Spell, choose a color and target a Creature.
Until the end of the next Night Phase, that Creature is immune to Spells and effects of that color.
You may repeat this ability at the start of each Day phase that Mother of Runes is in play.
In post 2758, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I only voted Iconeum halfway through, and I haven't seen a reason to leave
.____.
I starting to see what
Maid Cafe
and
Alisae
saw in the fact that you're being pretty vague and not open much at all.
Why haven't you replied to
Iconeum
? He's posted multiple times and you haven't engaged. I highly doubt, with 16 players other than yourself, and with this much to read in the game; that's your only scumread, or the only person worth pushing.
What did I miss of his?
2757 - You also don't have anything to say about the read on you? I get that it's partially meta-based, but this gives me the impression that you're pretty alright with a wagon on you, which strikes me as anti-town.
Um I did respond by saying I didn't really have a good counter? Like on the surface it's a decent case but I myself feel like it's not accurate.
Also, I don't understand your
Micc
read progression through ISO.
The first mention I see, looking at your ISO, is that you townread
Micc
2213 - And I'm not seeing a post where you talked to him prior to this, so can you link one?
You say he needs review not long after in 2226 2235 - you ask questions on a townread of his. 2325 - you say his reads are convenient, but haven't really stated why. 2328 - I can only assume this is you stating your dislike for a post that was 700 posts earlier, and you're speaking about it now when
Micc's
not really in the game at this point.
Your "look" onto him seems fruitless, and your other posts so far hasn't really added much of anything.
I never actually looked at Micc. The whole shift from townreading to scumreading came from in-process-viewing of events.
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
FTR: I do NOT think there are any 3P in the game. I don't even understand what Cerb was going about when he brought up the possibility of a 3P than would prevent a Town win while alive, or where he got it from.
In post 2611, SnarkySnowman wrote:A50 that's a bad lie detect for so many reasons.... Like it's a silly thing to lie about and doesn't mean a lot to me.....
However, it seems there are a couple of people who think otherwise. Like, I don't want to
tell
you what to do with your role, but I'm legit pissed at Ali for coming up with this shit.
I feel like Almost50 is a bit more indignant as town so this is probably town him? This is a newer tell based on newer meta and has not been proofed against older games.
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
In post 2611, SnarkySnowman wrote:A50 that's a bad lie detect for so many reasons.... Like it's a silly thing to lie about and doesn't mean a lot to me.....
However, it seems there are a couple of people who think otherwise. Like, I don't want to
tell
you what to do with your role, but I'm legit pissed at Ali for coming up with this shit.
I feel like Almost50 is a bit more indignant as town so this is probably town him? This is a newer tell based on newer meta and has not been proofed against older games.
Plus I am sketched out by how easily Alisae/Taly dropped the A50 attack when it was determined that the lie detect would resolve that. Seems like part of a master plan to buddy (or that thing I can’t say) with Cerb.
@A50: our win con is to remove the end. It is not to remove all threats. That means that if there were say a serial killer, if they were still alive when we removed the last member of the end, town would just win. Therefore any 3p that can't win with town would require some mechanism preventing town from winning upon removing the end from the game.
That makes me think it's unlikely that any antitown 3p are in the game.
In post 2791, Reasonably Rational wrote:@A50: our win con is to remove the end. It is not to remove all threats. That means that if there were say a serial killer, if they were still alive when we removed the last member of the end, town would just win. Therefore any 3p that can't win with town would require some mechanism preventing town from winning upon removing the end from the game.
That makes me think it's unlikely that any antitown 3p are in the game.
-Cerb
Oh, maybe I misinterpreted what you said ... again. I thought you were suggesting there might be a 3P that -while alive- DOES prevent the town from winning.
In post 2791, Reasonably Rational wrote:@A50: our win con is to remove the end. It is not to remove all threats. That means that if there were say a serial killer, if they were still alive when we removed the last member of the end, town would just win. Therefore any 3p that can't win with town would require some mechanism preventing town from winning upon removing the end from the game.
That makes me think it's unlikely that any antitown 3p are in the game.
-Cerb
Oh, maybe I misinterpreted what you said ... again. I thought you were suggesting there might be a 3P that -while alive- DOES prevent the town from winning.
Nope, I was just saying that if an antitown 3p exists, they'd need to have some effect like that, not that it was likely that was the case.
In post 2739, Maid Cafe wrote:Ok to put my read really simply because I like to lie to myself and say I am studying while I procrastinate. And I am stupidly lazy atm.
Compare how Gamma plays in the average town game to his play here. Gamma is typically a super open player like Creature levels of open and it's just super apparent when you read his town games when nothing he posts makes sense because its all just his raw thoughts and it's just generally obvious town. And it's not like Gamma is at Mark's level where he can emulate that as either alignment.
Just generally i think his average town thought processes aren't really present and it feels a lot more like a player going through motions then anything else. Like his most recent post really just read as scum posting for the sake of it and I can pull up other posts but that is just the trend I get while reading his posts.
Like I feel like if you just read his ISO it's just really obvious there is just a closed nature to his posts that really is never there when he is town.
Sorry if this is poorly explained but that's generally why I think he is scum.
~B
i will note that i actually initially townread gamma for the completely opposite of this; i came in and i actually thought gamma's posting reminded me of his town play. i agree with your description of gamma's townplay and i think his posts like the ones above my #2237 fit the criteria of what i considered towngamma since a lot of them just look like he is dumping his thoughts into the thread.
In post 2791, Reasonably Rational wrote:@A50: our win con is to remove the end. It is not to remove all threats. That means that if there were say a serial killer, if they were still alive when we removed the last member of the end, town would just win. Therefore any 3p that can't win with town would require some mechanism preventing town from winning upon removing the end from the game.
That makes me think it's unlikely that any antitown 3p are in the game.
-Cerb
Actually this is a good catch where the fuck is the shit you were pulling in RC's recent UPick Alisae? Why weren't you asking people about this? If it's somewhere between like page 60 and 80 then just point me to it, otherwise why didn't you do this?
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
