OK, going through this now.
In post 879, Sky_Paladin wrote:OK hey I got some time to play. Here we go. Let's look at Icon. First of all, happy scumday, Icon! Have a read on your ISO to lighten up your day
So, this line is perhaps the most interesting line in the entire post for me. You wish icon a happy scumday. The thing is that it isn't icon's scumday - it's mine. (or was in your timezone when you were writing the post; whatever)
What this shows me is that you aren't paying a lot of attention to details, and that you're conflating memory with fact (I know that you said that this is what you're doing, but this kinda makes it a lot easier for me to believe.). And since this is clearly not game-related, it kinda makes me think you're just misreading things in general, and that the misreps probably aren't planned, since you're misreading things not directly game-related too. So although the misreps are annoying me, I don't think they're inherently scum-motivated, like I did previously.
This is just throwing me for a loop, since you don't really seem to be the type of player that would misread things this badly - like you're going through all these posts in great detail and I just don't get how you keep on seeing things that aren't there. But I'm pretty sure now that you aren't doing it on purpose (ie purposefully misrepping me to score a mislynch), but it does mean that you're not playing the way I'd expect you to, so I'm having trouble reading you confidantly.
I don't want to lynch you today. Right now, I do think you're incredibly conf-biased and that you're finding evidence to support your pre-existing notions.
---------------
In post 879, Sky_Paladin wrote:He started out hard on Not Mafia which turned out not to matter because NM was town. All of Icon's first posts, up til 132, were drilling Not Mafia for claiming mafia.
I think this is the most important part of his ISO cuz I just don't see this coming from bluescum. Can you please address this point specifically?
---------------
In post 879, Sky_Paladin wrote:The empty unvote a mere 70 posts later in 531 is therefore counter-intuitive; Icon actually drops his scum read on Beefster while disagreeing with Beefster's push on GiF. The unvote reason was because 'effort' but effort is not alignment indicative. So this unvote does bother me as I would have thought Icon would gravitate to his next intuitive read of scum!Hawk.
So things like this is where I'm getting *new* from, like the fact that he's reading effort as being AI.
--------------
In post 879, Sky_Paladin wrote:Scrolling through, Icon never responded to this, and instead jumped on to the Beefster wagon in 559 to put him at L-1, because at this point Beefster had basically desintegrated and had lost all credibility.
If people don't respond to me I usually drop it; I don't really see the point of badgering people if they aren't responding to me.
---------------
In post 879, Sky_Paladin wrote:Note in particular Hawk/Aninenen vanished from Icon's reads, and then Hawk/Aninenen died that night phase to blue mafia.
I don't understand the connection you're drawing here. Why is not having a read on Hawk/Aninenen suspicious in this context?
In post 879, Sky_Paladin wrote:Who else died to blue mafia? Tatl and Tael, a player who Icon questioned over their interactions with Skitter, who was then flat out ignored by Icon once Tatl and Tael had moved on.
Hey, who is the player that Icon wants to lynch this day phase? Sky_Paladin, the player who has given Skitter the most trouble.
The cynic in me suggests this is probably not a coincidence.
Bolded: it's lylo. Why would scum do this instead of just pushing for the easiest mislynch?
Also I think it's kinda silly to suggest that TT got killed because blue-scum icon didn't like their townread on his partner. Like the 'interactions with skitter' that you're objecting to is that TT was townreading me for that post, but ico wasn't. Why would the follow-up there be to kill tt?
In post 879, Sky_Paladin wrote:I think Icon's play looks town on day 1 and 3, and scum on day 2. The night kills seem to straight up implicate Icon as blue mafia although I can't place the Sesq one.
You're kinda arguing that the nks implicate ico *in reference to me*, not ico individually. (although I don't really understand the logic on any of them tbh).
I'm not sure why you're objecting to me responding to the bits about me when this post isn't really analyzing ico only, but more analyzing a me/ico scumteam from the ico side. Like a lot of this post *is* about me.
In post 879, Sky_Paladin wrote:Between Skitter/Icon, I think Icon has the stronger town play though I would like explanations of how he is now town reading Skitter and scum reading me. This doesn't appear to have developed naturally.
Perhaps the townread on me didn't develop naturally cuz it doesn't exist.
As far as I can tell, this is talking about TT, but they were townreading me, so this doesn't make sense.
----------------
spring
599 - yeah, I agree. she's not doing much to try to prevent a lynch on someone she seems to be townreading. It's actually kinda white-knight-y/'claiming towncred for correctly reading a flipped townie', if you compare that to 'I'm not very happy about the beefster lynch' from
647 and 'beefster was quite obviously town to me' from
659.
I feel like sesq was super obvious lynchbait and kinda exactly where scum would want to push - kinda like scum pushing on NM, like Hawk did. I'm just wondering if spring would kill a major scumread of hers, leaving her with nowhere to push?
@spring: what *date* did you replace in?
I'm getting kinda paranoid of GIF/spring, with some major distancing/bussing going on.