sarcasm isn't funny, okay?
Deadline
Snarky Snowman no longer counts as a living player.
They may still post, but they may not vote, be voted for, act, or be targeted.
Bronya Zaychik has been prodded
sarcasm isn't funny, okay?
I’m not entirely sure what happened. I had the outline figured out but when I tried to complete it; it got reset. Hopefully, I can remember it and thanks, I really appreciate you undestanding.In post 3864, Chara wrote:this, Nancy. i hope you feel better soon.In post 3859, Reasonably Rational wrote:What Chara's asking for comes ahead of forming reads.
Really really. So yeah, if time is limited, please focus on that. Thanks! <3
but, yes, if you only have time to devote to one thing, the puzzle is priority.
Yes, the puzzle. I’m not really sure of its significance but I will do my best to complete it.In post 3859, Reasonably Rational wrote:What Chara's asking for comes ahead of forming reads.In post 3857, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Yes I have but until I’m fully caught up; I’m at a definite disadvantage. I will try to give some more reads later.In post 3844, Reasonably Rational wrote:Speaking of Nancy, where are you in the game now? Have you at least been reading the new posts as you catch up on the old?
-Cerb
Really really. So yeah, if time is limited, please focus on that. Thanks! <3
-Cerb
Correct.In post 3880, Reasonably Rational wrote:@Kiana: So you lost your vote when we went to Pacifist? And PH went from having half a vote(which is functionally no vote, unless another half vote exists), to having 2 votes?
In post 3881, Reasonably Rational wrote:@Varsoon: What is a "simple majority" of votes as defined in the rule set?
-Cerb
So due to rounding, a half vote will never accomplish anything on a slot, unless we reach day end and the vote is decided by most votes/most recent vote at that time.In post 3883, Varsoon wrote:In post 3881, Reasonably Rational wrote:@Varsoon: What is a "simple majority" of votes as defined in the rule set?
-Cerb½ # of living players +1, rounded down.
So for today, on Pacifist, there's 14 living players (Snarky Snowman doesn't count as 'living').
Half of 14 is 7. 7 + 1 is 8. It takes 8 votes to lynch a player. This is reflected on the VC.
1) I don't think I tunneled Iconeum? Either way, current read is "might be mafia but he's kinda low importance". My main reason for lynching him over anyone else was mostly "If he's mafia I see him having the charisma to fuck shit up".In post 3870, Purple Heart wrote:1)Gamma, you say you're being tunneled, but what did you do withIconeumfor D1? What's your read on him now?
2)Thoughts onVenmar, or a general readslist?
3)Also, your case onMCis that they have a guilty on you, but you tracked them and they took no night action? Correct?
Finally done with the ISO maps so far.
My vote still stands unlessAlisaetalks me into changing it.
~ Taly
I suppose you're undecided withIn post 3873, baku and munna wrote:im gonna take this as referring toIn post 3819, Purple Heart wrote:Spoiler: Baku ISO Map
Baku, there are several slots where you've only mildly interacted with or gave thoughts about through readslist, do you have any strong reads at the moment and any clarity on the lesser interacted with slots?
~ Taly
creature, snarky, almost, skybird, iconeum, micc/nancy, dunn
creature i tend to not get reads on, they just sound like background noise to me. what i do remember of his posting was alright. nulltown.
snarky is in this game?
almost is an interesting one. hammer on mark makes them likely scum. however, their response to it was the most townie one possible. however, almost is a good enough player to pull that off. I do trust Chara's meta on him which is what is making me pause on his alignment.
iconeum - lynch bait imo. probably town if skybird is scum.
i reckon skybird is scum because of their assertion about ico's alignment.
micc/nancy are in this game?
dunn could be scum due to 0 reasons to think they are town
In post 3880, Reasonably Rational wrote:So, we have confirmation that Dunnstral can't be voted for by at least one individual.
VOTE: Dunnstral
I should have probably done this before, just to have independent corroboration that Dunnstral truly can't be voted for. Possible they're not truly lynchproof, and the votes simply don't show up until they reach lynch or some other threshold. That would reduce the semi-counterclaim effect of having two slots that are lynchproof in Pacifist.
@Kiana: So you lost your vote when we went to Pacifist? And PH went from having half a vote(which is functionally no vote, unless another half vote exists), to having 2 votes?
-Cerb
Show what your motivations are, then. Where's your head at?In post 3824, Dunnstral wrote:How is any of that scum motivated rather than just lazy in this game?In post 3821, Iconeum wrote:Dunstrall's first 8 posts are all NAI, not a single one talks about the game or the players. In 2269 he gives his first read on Maid Cafe town/Skybird unknown. Promises to take a look at these 2, never follows this up.
Next posts are all 3-4 word non-engaging posts like 2271, 2384 and 2453. This time could have been spent researching the MC/Skybird slots as promised but chooses to post that crap.
Next post that does anything is claiming unlynchable, which does nothing but distract. Never comments on reads, no votes, overall I'm not feeling any care for sorting.
VOTE: Dunstrall
There hasn't been a vote count after Skybirds vote on Dun, so let's see what happens. If we don't (or can't ) lynch him today, I want to see him lynched tomorrow.
In post 3886, Gamma Emerald wrote:1) I don't think I tunneled Iconeum? Either way, current read is "might be mafia but he's kinda low importance". My main reason for lynching him over anyone else was mostly "If he's mafia I see him having the charisma to fuck shit up".In post 3870, Purple Heart wrote:1)Gamma, you say you're being tunneled, but what did you do withIconeumfor D1? What's your read on him now?
2)Thoughts onVenmar, or a general readslist?
3)Also, your case onMCis that they have a guilty on you, but you tracked them and they took no night action? Correct?
Finally done with the ISO maps so far.
My vote still stands unlessAlisaetalks me into changing it.
~ Taly
2) I think Venmar's read on me is okay? It has felt weird but I don't see anything too bad with his meta argument he had. As for other reads I could totally see Dunn being scum with MC, but other than that I need to review for associations because that's the only person I would immediately say looks suspicious off a MC scum flip.
3) Yeah that's the majority of it. The other is the fact that no matter what happens to the things impacting their reads it never seems to change them. Reads as a scum agenda. If MC were to explain the guilty and how they got it I'd give them the pass on that one but the second point would still remain.
Iconeum also voted for Dunnstral so with your vote there would be three votes if they showed up.In post 3880, Reasonably Rational wrote:So, we have confirmation that Dunnstral can't be voted for by at least one individual.
VOTE: Dunnstral
I should have probably done this before, just to have independent corroboration that Dunnstral truly can't be voted for. Possible they're not truly lynchproof, and the votes simply don't show up until they reach lynch or some other threshold. That would reduce the semi-counterclaim effect of having two slots that are lynchproof in Pacifist.
@Kiana: So you lost your vote when we went to Pacifist? And PH went from having half a vote(which is functionally no vote, unless another half vote exists), to having 2 votes?
-Cerb
Even before people knew about that, they were still tying the two of you together. There must have been behavior reasons, not just "same hood" reasons.In post 3892, Skybird wrote:RR, I think it's because we were in the hood together on D1.
Have they both been townreading each other the whole game? That will determine what I think of them.In post 3889, Purple Heart wrote:1) What do you think about Iconeum/Skybird?
2) Dunnstral has done little to interact with anyone, I don't know how you made the association of him and MC?
3) I want to hear MC respond to this.
Why don't you know the answer to your first question?In post 3894, Gamma Emerald wrote:Have they both been townreading each other the whole game? That will determine what I think of them.In post 3889, Purple Heart wrote:1) What do you think about Iconeum/Skybird?
2) Dunnstral has done little to interact with anyone, I don't know how you made the association of him and MC?
3) I want to hear MC respond to this.
I'm suspecting MC and Dunn lock-clearing each other with Dunnstral having barely done anything. People have been saying lurker!Dunn is his town meta, and I know that to be untrue.
I know what you're asking.In post 3898, Gamma Emerald wrote:I know they both townread each other NOW, I'm asking if that's always been the case.