Do you think LAMIST is scummy?In post 774, skitter30 wrote:That isn't exactly my read on oxy. My read is more: a lot of LAMIST behavior; building a townbloc in a way that feels artificial to me; what appeared to me to be trying to push a lynch on an inactive player; possibly trying to pocket people.In post 755, ofrhz wrote:I definitely think at least one scum is in eth0s/drixx/northsidegal/maybe skitter (yes I realize this is half the players in the game), just because their analysis of “this is a risky/overconfident play, ergo Oxy is scum” seems a bit... shallow? However, it doesn’t strike me as particularly likely that ruru would be teamed with any of them.
In the context of the game and what I think about Oxy's personality: he believes day 1 is not too random, he wants to solve the game, and he got increasingly tilted due to not being able to solve it with any kind of certainty. And I feel some of where he's coming from on this too; it's pretty frustrating working with limited information especially if it feels like half the players aren't trying.OK, why isn't that a scummy post when people have more time to read the game?In post 761, ruru wrote:So, I think maybe some people (especially eth0s) have analyzed the game that way because they are kind of skimming the thread due to time constraints. Like in isolation 504 is scumpost of the game. If I read the whole thread in an hour I would probably think Oxy is scum too.
So yeah, I read 504 as tilted town. If it were a hollywood movie then that post would be made by the villain, but this isn't a hollywood movie and I have a much harder time seeing scum get that tilted over allegedly failing to push a mislynch than I do seeing town get that tilted given the above.
But in 436 you said 3 days would also make you uncomfortable (despite presumably it being very likely he shows up within 3 days due to activity requirements).Also I think that pressuring someone to explain a vote with like over a week left is different from putting them to L-1 and saying if they don't post pro-town stuff within a day they'll get lynched. Yeah, he might not have seen my vote on him for a couple of days, but like, the day wasn't going to be ending soon, so he'd see it whenever he caught up. Like it didn't matter to me if he saw it in 24 hours or 48 hours. If he catches up he'd see if eventually and see that was something taht concerned me.
The 24 hour deadline made me uncomfortable.
---
I thought there was a better chance of NSG responding honestly that's the main reason. Also flipping Drixx doesn't seem that valuable to me.At this point, Drixx and NSG are my top two lynch priorities. I'm just kind of confused why NSG is preferred over Drixx. At least nsg gave a readlist. Drixx has so far only talked about one person, which is seriously detrimental going into the next day of the game. Maybe two people if you count his reaction test on me.
---
Maybe I didn't directly ask, but I think my reaction could be reasonably expected to lead to more discussion. I'm not sure why you think this is scummy.In post 830, Scioness Sajj wrote:VOTE: Ruru
Her naked vote on Drixx stands out. It was pretty opportunistic to me and I find her reasoning rather weak in comparison to all her other posts. I have talked about it ealier, I can add more if needed.
I didn’t like her reaction to ofrhz’s vote. She said she didn’t understand the vote 699 and she doesn’t think she has been acting scummy 730 but it didn’t change her read on ofrhz 705 nor did she ask why he voted her.
Do you really believe this is why I voted?
I did not find the unvote suspicious
Care to explain why you don't like my reasoning?She talked about skitter not playing optimally as scum 609 and made in depth analysis of Oxy’s post 507. Yet she only votes lurkers for pretty on the surface level scummy reasons.
Her vote on NSG gave me all kinds of bad vibes. I don’t know how ruru missed NSG’s read on Oxy and NSG convo with ofrhz about that vote. I also don’t like Ruru’s reasoning from later posts:
“Yes, I think it's a bit in the "wow, that sucks" category and I feel like a town player who believes that something is hurting her win% would be more motivated to understand why things are that way and how to improve the situation.”
“NSG first tried to get others to vote in 716. After that, she jumped on the Oxy wagon herself. Her timing seems opportunistic to me.”
I was never interested in lynching anyone with 1 week left before the AFKs talked. I generally tried to avoid saying it out loud, for reasons that have been discussed to death. If the deadline is closer and the AFKs are down to Drixx+NSG I think it's probably a lot harder for one or both of them to stall the game as scum (because now they might actually get lynched for it).We were four days away from the deadline at that time. In 708 (two days before 747) Drixx promised he would most likely made more posts that night, he didn’t.In post 747, ruru wrote:skitter is V/LA, and I don't feel like voting on her would be that productive right now anyway because she already gave a defense and it doesn't make sense to lynch anyone before hearing more from Drixx/NSG.
She was okay putting Drixx at L-1 earlier in the game when we are close to end of the day, it is totally fine for her to wait for Drixx. That’s stalling.
Umm, his post literally asked me to explain my vote.I don’t like 761.
Ruru quotes ofrhz’s part of post that was address to everybody, but mentioned her, and uses it as an excuse to defend Oxy and give another explanation of her vote on NSG.
Yes, I did. Do you disagree with this correction? Do you think it is better or worse for town to know the actual deadline?She also mentions that westillhave around three more days.
I address this earlier in this post.From her readlist - Drixx is apparently less suspicious now then he was before even though he didn’t post anything since 708 - I think she put him higher because of people’s reaction to her vote earlier.
Did it occur to you that you might be misunderstanding other things too? Like your case on me is all kinds of weird and I can't tell if it's coming from confused town or confused scum.About my convo with her on the last pages.
I have actually misunderstood her with one part. I forgot that I have explained to her again my thoughts of that wagon so I thought that she addressed it on her own.
Still from what I have understood - Ruru was voting Drixx for both pressure and lynch and she believed that people would be there in time to unvote if Drixx made a towny post.
Ruru didn’t really tell me anything that makes me question my first analysis of that wagon.
---
I was thinking maybe you'd read more of the game and had some new ideas beyond Oxy makes LAMIST posts => Oxy is scum.In post 782, northsidegal wrote:i have explained my scumread on oxy previously. if you have any questions or would like clarification then just ask.In post 747, ruru wrote:Can you explain your vote?
Why? Did you ever propose a concrete plan or try to lead town?hey, i know the feeling.In post 749, Oxy wrote:Oxy points out that the end of D1 is not so far away and proposes plan to pressure people who haven't posted much.
Oxy gets scum read for his plan, but no other ideas for pressuring inactive players is put forward.
I was wondering if scum!NSG first wanted to see if Oxy would get lynched without her help, and that's why she didn't vote until prompted.what about the timing is opportunistic to you? oxy has been my top scumread since i entered into this game ??would there have been aIn post 761, ruru wrote:NSG first tried to get others to vote in 716. After that, she jumped on the Oxy wagon herself. Her timing seems opportunistic to me.lessopportunistic time to vote him?