Newbie 1859 (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Scioness Sajj
-
Scioness Sajj Mafia Scum
- Scioness Sajj
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: February 7, 2018
- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Scioness Sajj
-
Scioness Sajj Mafia Scum
- Scioness Sajj
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: February 7, 2018
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
@oxy:
A. I disagree with the premises of your hypothetical. (ie I don't think you're town). If I absolutely must indulge in your thought experiment, I'm left with pin/scioness/ofrzh/ruru.
I don't think scioness is scum:
pin/ofrzh ----> I don't know why you're ruling this one out.
pin/ruru ---> probably not super likely given his ruru vote. Not enough for me to rule it out though.
ofrzh/ruru
Like none of these seem implausible enough for me to rule out.
If I absolutely must include scioness:
scioness/pin
scioness/ofrz
scioness/ruru ----> I don't think scioness starts a push on her partner just before deadline at the end of the day1 when she wasn't going to be around.
So I don't particulartly agree with your conclusion that based on PoE, removing me/nsg/you, the obvious lynch ought to be ruru or scioness; strictly looking at teams via PoE, ofrzh or pin make sense in a bunch of pairs too. If it absolutely got down to ruru or scioness I would vote ruru, but, like, I don't get why you're creating dichotomy where it ought to be one of the two - there's a lot of other people I'd rather be voting than scioness, and one/two people I'd rather vote before ruru (ie can't decide if ofrzh goes before or after ruru atm), and either pin or ofrzh seem like reasonable options using a strictly PoE argument like you did since as far as I can tell, they fit into a bunch of pairings too.
B. Also having bad reads != being scum.
And not townreading != scumreading.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
And like, I think the whole hypothetical is silly given this.In post 1616, skitter30 wrote:In post 1613, Oxy wrote:@ofrhz @sajjThis is the level of associations reading that I think actually could be detrimental. Too much wifom, too many assumptions. The problem with all of the "scum!x would obviously use this strategy" is that scum!x could have simply used a different strategy.
Things I'm taking to the bank today.
ruru is town.
nsg is town.
skitter, regardless of alignment, has been making some very scummy arguments.
I've only been saying that for like the entire phase.- Scioness Sajj
-
Scioness Sajj Mafia Scum
- Scioness Sajj
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: February 7, 2018
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Yeah this basically.In post 1630, Scioness Sajj wrote:like idk I'm leaning towards disregarding any of pintu's pairings because he is the purest being in this game (+ I don't think NSG would just throw towntells like that around)
But I don’t think their votes are something scum wouldn’t do.
Like if we're making pairs based strictly on PoE, and disregarding townreads on pin/scioness/ruru/ofrzh, the only pairing from that set that I find unlikely in a partner-sense is scioness/ruru. Like his reasons for eliminating pairs aren't particularly compelling for me.- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
- Scioness Sajj
-
Scioness Sajj Mafia Scum
- Scioness Sajj
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Okay, yeah, I explain why your conclusion is bad and you're waiving away the content of my point by saying that I'm scummy.In post 1632, Oxy wrote:okay, yeah. I was worried for a bit, but I'm still happy with my vote.
Explain you think my last few posts reaffirm your scumread on me.- Scioness Sajj
-
Scioness Sajj Mafia Scum
- Scioness Sajj
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: February 7, 2018
- Scioness Sajj
-
Scioness Sajj Mafia Scum
- Scioness Sajj
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: February 7, 2018
- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
I don't do this often because I don't like walls, but let's break this down.
In post 1628, skitter30 wrote:@oxy:
A. I disagree with the premises of your hypothetical. (ie I don't think you're town). If I absolutely must indulge in your thought experiment, I'm left with pin/scioness/ofrzh/ruru.
I don't think scioness is scum:
pin/ofrzh ----> I don't know why you're ruling this one out.Here, Skitter implies that I haven't just expounded on my reasoning for this rather than refute it.
pin/ruru ---> probably not super likely given his ruru vote. Not enough for me to rule it out though.
ofrzh/ruru
Like none of these seem implausible enough for me to rule out.
If I absolutely must include scioness:
scioness/pin
scioness/ofrz
scioness/ruru ----> I don't think scioness starts a push on her partner just before deadline at the end of the day1 when she wasn't going to be around.
So I don't particulartly agree with your conclusion that based on PoE, removing me/nsg/you, the obvious lynch ought to be ruru or scioness; strictly looking at teams via PoE, ofrzh or pin make sense in a bunch of pairs too. If it absolutely got down to ruru or scioness I would vote ruru, but, like, I don't get why you're creating dichotomy where it ought to be one of the two - there's a lot of other people I'd rather be voting than scioness, and one/two people I'd rather vote before ruru (ie can't decide if ofrzh goes before or after ruru atm), and either pin or ofrzh seem like reasonable options using a strictly PoE argument like you did since as far as I can tell, they fit into a bunch of pairings too.
Here Skitter pretends to analyze my conclusions, but is actually analyzing my conclusions in the context of Pin+Ofrhz not being ruled out.
If you change the given, the conclusion will change.
But remember, she didn't refute, or even engage with my reasoning for that assumption.
She pretended I had given zero reasoning.
Because it's obvious, given the assumption that Pin + Ofrhz cannot be a pair, why one would want to lynch in {ruru, scioness}
B. Also having bad reads != being scum.
And not townreading != scumreading.
And that's what this entire game has been, at least since the drixx wagon. Skitter looking at my posts, ignoring key components of an argument, and then going off on a wild tangent to confuse the game state.- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
In case it wasn't clear enough, here's the key part close up.In post 1628, skitter30 wrote:I don't get why you're creating dichotomy where it ought to be one of the two - there's a lot of other people I'd rather be voting than scioness, and one/two people I'd rather vote before ruru (ie can't decide if ofrzh goes before or after ruru atm), and either pin or ofrzh seem like reasonable options using a strictly PoE argument like you did since as far as I can tell, they fit into a bunch of pairings too.
She says she "doesn't get" why I would have made that conclusion, but that conclusion should be obvious if one considers the givens. It's okay to question the assumptions, and it's okay to question the conclusions, but here she is implying that there is no reasoning, and uses that as a springboard into talking about nonsense.- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I don't know why you're not including pin/ofrzh.
You mean this?In post 1623, Oxy wrote:I hate being wrong, it looks bad for any argument I'm making, but I just don't see two scum jumping from a live mislynch wagon, to a L-4 wagon that no one is talking about but them, so late in the day. I just don't.
I actually didn't see this post.
I don't know what this is referring to. Which wagon did they jump off of, and which wagon did they join?
Are you referring to how they both voted ruru at the end of the day? They didn't leave the same wagon (ofrzh wasn't voting, and pin left my wagon), and pin switched his vote back after like three posts. It makes the team more implausible but I don't see this as a reason to rule them out completely.
If that's not what you're talking about idk what this is referring to.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
The givens are: town me/you/nsg.In post 1639, Oxy wrote:
In case it wasn't clear enough, here's the key part close up.In post 1628, skitter30 wrote:I don't get why you're creating dichotomy where it ought to be one of the two - there's a lot of other people I'd rather be voting than scioness, and one/two people I'd rather vote before ruru (ie can't decide if ofrzh goes before or after ruru atm), and either pin or ofrzh seem like reasonable options using a strictly PoE argument like you did since as far as I can tell, they fit into a bunch of pairings too.
She says she "doesn't get" why I would have made that conclusion, but that conclusion should be obvious if one considers the givens. It's okay to question the assumptions, and it's okay to question the conclusions, but here she is implying that there is no reasoning, and uses that as a springboard into talking about nonsense.
I don't understand the reasoning you're using to get from your given to get to your conclusion.
(and lol at being ok to question the assumptions because I litearlly did that yesterday and you objected to that)- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
- Oxy
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Oxy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
this is basically what I want to do too, yay for us.
- Scioness Sajj
-
Scioness Sajj
- Scioness Sajj
-
Scioness Sajj Mafia Scum
- Scioness Sajj
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: February 7, 2018
- Scioness Sajj
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- skitter30
- Oxy
- Oxy
- skitter30
- skitter30
- Oxy
- Oxy
- Oxy
- Oxy
- Oxy
- Oxy
- Scioness Sajj
- Scioness Sajj
- skitter30
- Oxy
- skitter30
- Scioness Sajj
- skitter30
- skitter30
- Scioness Sajj
- Scioness Sajj