how are all these people clear?In post 972, Quick wrote:yeah. Your all clear.In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:As town?In post 967, Quick wrote:Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:What about Beeboy?In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
VOTE: Pan
I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.In post 975, Toranaga wrote:how are all these people clear?In post 972, Quick wrote:yeah. Your all clear.In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:As town?In post 967, Quick wrote:Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:What about Beeboy?In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
VOTE: Pan
I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
Could be a busted role but I'm more inclined to disbelieve this claim.In post 975, Toranaga wrote:how are all these people clear?In post 972, Quick wrote:yeah. Your all clear.In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:As town?In post 967, Quick wrote:Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:What about Beeboy?In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
VOTE: Pan
I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
Bullshit.In post 978, Quick wrote:I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.In post 975, Toranaga wrote:how are all these people clear?In post 972, Quick wrote:yeah. Your all clear.In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:As town?In post 967, Quick wrote:Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:What about Beeboy?In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
VOTE: Pan
I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
your tone is very towny, and you're playing like you did in floral.In post 977, Hopkirk wrote:Ausuka HI. Why am I town.
I don't think we should push him on this. there is an anti-claim mechanic.In post 980, Panopticon wrote:Bullshit.In post 978, Quick wrote:I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.In post 975, Toranaga wrote:how are all these people clear?In post 972, Quick wrote:yeah. Your all clear.In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:As town?In post 967, Quick wrote:Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:What about Beeboy?In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
VOTE: Pan
I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
Tchill, HI. As another player in Floral, do you think Ausuka sounds legit here?In post 982, Ausuka wrote:your tone is very towny, and you're playing like you did in floral.In post 977, Hopkirk wrote:Ausuka HI. Why am I town.
pedit: ok I like that!
VOTE: tchill13
I didn't say we should, I'm stating my disbelief that his role can clear 5 people in one shot.In post 984, Ausuka wrote:I don't think we should push him on this. there is an anti-claim mechanic.In post 980, Panopticon wrote:Bullshit.In post 978, Quick wrote:I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.In post 975, Toranaga wrote:how are all these people clear?In post 972, Quick wrote:yeah. Your all clear.In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:As town?In post 967, Quick wrote:Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:What about Beeboy?In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
VOTE: Pan
I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
I am not known for my SRs being good but my TRs are dec.In post 986, Panopticon wrote:I didn't say we should, I'm stating my disbelief that his role can clear 5 people in one shot.In post 984, Ausuka wrote:I don't think we should push him on this. there is an anti-claim mechanic.In post 980, Panopticon wrote:Bullshit.In post 978, Quick wrote:I don't want to say because Scum could take advantage of that. Just trust me on that.In post 975, Toranaga wrote:how are all these people clear?In post 972, Quick wrote:yeah. Your all clear.In post 968, Hopkirk wrote:As town?In post 967, Quick wrote:Not sure but we can throw in cheeky for sure.In post 964, Hopkirk wrote:What about Beeboy?In post 955, Quick wrote:Nero is clear and so is hopkirk.
VOTE: Pan
I mean I'm townreading all of them but why are you clearing them?
~The Observer
1) Because it makes it seem look like you're engaging and trying to sort people. Or that maybe they should townread you or ignore you when you back off before risking any serious pushback or engagement when they interact with you.In post 952, Hopkirk wrote:1.) Why does scum me push people then 'back off'? What do I gain there? Think about actual scum motivation before saying it's scummy since scum have no incentive to do that. You're scumreading style rather than motive.
Why can't town me like responses? Why do I not move on to other people when I'm happy with what I have?
2.) The initial engagement wasn't leading anywhere. Not sure why you think it's scummy to try and make it something meaningful.
Alisae, but I'm not sure why.In post 974, Ausuka wrote:just out of curiosity, who was your first guess?In post 969, Brian Skies wrote:Heh. Not my first guess but I'll take it.In post 947, Ausuka wrote:Yeah. We played together in alisae's beneath the mask game, where I was in the chikoritas hydra with echovision, and we were masons with davesaz.In post 946, Brian Skies wrote:That posting style Quick quoted looks familiar to me. Would I be accurate if I said we've played together before?In post 911, Ausuka wrote:well, this is the account I use permanently now, but yeah.
SameIn post 989, Hopkirk wrote:The guy who went out of his way to claim Villager is definitely saying he read people as towndue to his role?
Oh, lol. I don't think I really post like alisaeIn post 990, Brian Skies wrote:Alisae, but I'm not sure why.In post 974, Ausuka wrote:just out of curiosity, who was your first guess?In post 969, Brian Skies wrote:Heh. Not my first guess but I'll take it.In post 947, Ausuka wrote:Yeah. We played together in alisae's beneath the mask game, where I was in the chikoritas hydra with echovision, and we were masons with davesaz.In post 946, Brian Skies wrote:That posting style Quick quoted looks familiar to me. Would I be accurate if I said we've played together before?In post 911, Ausuka wrote:well, this is the account I use permanently now, but yeah.
are you a jester?In post 992, Centipede Syndrome wrote:okay
all of you need to think like a crazy person and you'll see what quick's thinking
quick needs to think like a normal person and then he'll realize what he's thinking is wrong
lmao
lol you can see me play as jester in jester nightlessIn post 995, Toranaga wrote:are you a jester?In post 992, Centipede Syndrome wrote:okay
all of you need to think like a crazy person and you'll see what quick's thinking
quick needs to think like a normal person and then he'll realize what he's thinking is wrong
lmao
1.) Better ways to look like I'm engaging people is to legitimately engage people. Your 'push back' looks like it was based on the original scumread of you so I gain nothing there either. Scum me doesn't bother wasting time trying to get scumread.In post 988, Brian Skies wrote:1) Because it makes it seem look like you're engaging and trying to sort people. Or that maybe they should townread you or ignore you when you back off before risking any serious pushback or engagement when they interact with you.In post 952, Hopkirk wrote:1.) Why does scum me push people then 'back off'? What do I gain there? Think about actual scum motivation before saying it's scummy since scum have no incentive to do that. You're scumreading style rather than motive.
Why can't town me like responses? Why do I not move on to other people when I'm happy with what I have?
2.) The initial engagement wasn't leading anywhere. Not sure why you think it's scummy to try and make it something meaningful.
2) I don't understand what you're talking about here. And you still haven't explained A) Why Brigand's post was townish or B) Your previous read of me.