Not at all, but I'll field your answers too.In post 1091, Srceenplay wrote:Is this toward me?
So you're basically running off a ping you can't even describe when directly asked.In post 1091, Srceenplay wrote:1: Idk. I’m 10-ish pages behind.
2: I did ask for their lynch. It’s not my style to make elaborate cases. I can’t do that. I see weird Smurf that pings me and I go vote it.
3: Not really. Brian pinged me earlier but I don’t remember why. I would have to iso.
Dude, I am a strong advocate of 1 sentence cases, and even in my world this is weaksauce.
What do you think you're doing to help town wincon?
I'm pretty sure the reality answer is: nothing.
I can easily describe how your play aids scum wincon.
Planning to adjust this, or do you consider your style awesome as is?
Kind of funny in relation to your other post I'm quoting hereIn post 1051, Srceenplay wrote:Ok.
If people are town reading quick, what I’m I doing wrong? What is I don’t see?
My quick (pun intended) answer would be this - what is he doing that's advancing scum wincon exactly?
The "scum case" on him basically sums up as 'he's posting gak to bog town down" (and a simple playstyle check will tell you this is NAI) and "he's dropping intentional fake town slips" to which my rebuttal is - he's not actually trying to bank on them in any meaningful way, and, frankly, I kinda doubt scum him would bother - can you show me a game where he did that as scum? I bet the answer is no.
That's the case on him.
The case for him being town is he's here, he's active, he's rocking the boat, and, within the context of how he plays, he appears to be trying to gamesolve.
Which is more than I can say for easily six other players.
So EVEN IF you want to call him scum - the real question is why aren't those six other lurksacks opportunistic voters MORE scummy to you?
And that's a decent reason to scumread you, frankly.
I'll preface this with "I'm shockingly impressed Quick remembered a game from 2016"In post 1086, Centipede Syndrome wrote:have you read or are you aware of inventions mafia
But, as far as I'm aware I didn't play in Invention Mafia, and I basically never read a game that I don't play in.
So I would go with "no".
Now that we've wasted time - would you like to just fast forward to the meta point you're about to make? Save me extra time and provide a relevant link to a post/ISO in question when you do. Because that will be my immediate follow up question if you present meta. Thanks!
It is blatantly obviously their playstyle.In post 1088, GreyICE wrote:I think every vote on Quick is because people are tired of him generating almost 8 pages of "content" in a game that's less than two days old. I know between him and Torantaga I'm damn close to replacing out because this Smurf is dreadful to read, and I'm coming close to supporting a policy lynch.
If this isn't sabre rattling you should replace out now - they're obviously not going to change and the game will take 2-3 game days to start slowing and you know it.
If it's sabre rattling, I don't get the point.