Here are posts of yours with reasoning that I thought was bleh. And I agreed with him about your vote.
Spoiler:
In post 279, Scioness Sajj wrote:it might be. he has been agreeing with people and cracked a bad joke. don't remember him posting anything interesting just yet.In post 277, ofrhz wrote:In post 258, ruru wrote:Oxy seems more diplomatic in this gameIs this AI though?In post 272, Scioness Sajj wrote: oxy seems a lot less opinionated and that's worrying.
In post 458, Scioness Sajj wrote:I agree with 2 and 5 but rest is a strech tbhIn post 328, Mathdino wrote:let it be known that you asked for it
i am not actually tunneling you as hard as the following is going to make it seem
1. game irrelevant commentIn post 81, the worst wrote:I think 13p is the perfect size game (give or take)
welcome. hope you enjoy it here.
sheeping the first rvs wagon to L-2 with nothing but a "hi" post pings me as more likely scummy than null/towny. L-2 also lacks the accountability of L-1 or even like a 2nd vote, it's a decent position for scum to be in.
idk if it were me I'd say something like "good wagon, evilduck must die (vote)" but that's not really the point.
I'm not lockscumming her ass and suggesting we lynch with fire but it's a great place to start
btw Math is super super heavily invested in the whole Mafia Discussion world and is incredibly sharp re. open setups. everything he says will be objectively correct or a highly educated opinion. but it's not alignment indicative.
2. buddying newbies
3. overexplained version of "L-2 is often the scumspot on the wagon"
4. irrelevant sidenote
5. backs down from the scumread but justifies his vote as pro-town (i hate to say LAMIST but)
6. buddies me with correct knowledge of my gameplay
none of these things are scummy in themselves but the combination of all 6 and this many words without things that i think actually advance the gamestate makes me read it as
posturing?
LAMISTy?
busywork?
whatever term you use for "scum trying to act like town", that.
In post 463, Scioness Sajj wrote:This is super overexplained for no reason. I don't like that he suggests ruru should be going after lurkers.In post 340, ofrhz wrote:Answered inline@other duckie, let him question me first.In post 325, Sunshine13 wrote: ruru is voting me because they townread you and I’m voting you. Thoughts regarding that very specific situation please.
I don't really want to speculate as to why she voted for you, as she was awfully sparse with her explanation in voting for you. Since you asked, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility for her to think you're scumreading me (also see tw's question directed at you). ruru could be confused why you are scumreading someone she townreads. Additionally, neither ruru nor I were townreading you, yet you chose to single me out for doing so. I think this was genuine mistake on your part though, but she might have seen it differently.
I guess you can consider the following non-exhaustive list of points you can cover:
Is it a good vote?I think she thinks it's a productive use of her vote. For relatively inexperienced players, I believe trying to find the motivation behind what they do is more important than what I think they should be doing with her vote. I elaborated on possible motivations above ^.But to answer your question at face value, I think she should be voting for Mohab or AP or someone who hasn't bothered to talk in game
Will it progress reads on me and/or ruru?See answer above. This also depends on her successive questioning and her ability to suss people out by engaging with them. I think that is a high ask for someone who is most likely playing her first game as town.
In summary, this, in addition to what I wrote earlier about her being more proactive this game, is why I am townreading her still. Have I answered your questions?
In post 476, Scioness Sajj wrote:I would expect him to be showing this tone more.
Yeah, he is really passive.