> my townreads have more scum-indicative data on scioness
>
tfw
> my townreads have more scum-indicative data on scioness
Not to argue against a lynch that isn't me, or anything....In post 1350, Mathdino wrote:my townreads have more scum-indicative data on scioness
Buy me a drink postgame
And here was I thinking a drink always comes be
You're kinda vague about oxy and you say things like 'he's dropping in [your] townlist (1065); and say scum!him would be buddying you (533) - when ruru points out that he *does* seem to be buddying, you say you'll just re-check your ISO but never really followed through; 'oxy could be the scumread that slipped by you but you want to check {scioness/ud} first' (885);In post 1284, Mathdino wrote:i feel like i've explained a lot of my oxy read? a lot of the routes/avenues he's been taking don't seem like ones scum would takeIn post 1283, skitter30 wrote:@math can you talk about your oxy read?
ANd give me a tldr why you were/are scumreading me?
ctrl+F my ISO for "oxy"
he's on my list of people to ISO
Are you really trying to argue that it isn't scum-indiciatve to vote a townread?In post 1286, Oxy wrote:The bit about UD is a decent description of what I did. I think it's laughable that you find it scum-indicative.
Yes, and drixx was also acting sketchy and we lynched him without a claim once he softed vt. Like I just think that scum!ofrhz is more survivalisstic and doesn't actively do things to put himself into the lynch poolIn post 1307, Mathdino wrote:except that exact behaviour from you is what put you as a locktownread for me because i determined it was outside of your scumrange
a) I didn't consistently describe your actions last game as anti-town. Some of them were (ie the first drixx wagon), and I called those out, but I woudln't use 'anti-town' to describe your play in that game in a holistic sense.In post 1287, Oxy wrote:Also, skitter, last game you consistently described my actions as anti-town.
Why does this not play into your read of me this game? Because right now your read on me is basically, "I wouldn't do that as town, so he must be scum."
Why is this LAMIST? And I dislike this lynch-pool.In post 1315, Scioness Sajj wrote:1255 screams LAMIST at me in the very wrong way, not much about onions.
I'm nowhere near being fully caught up but i'd lynch in {sunshine, ud, ofrhz} preferring ofrhz right now.
Are you really trying to argue that it isn't scum-indiciatve to vote a townread?In post 1286, Oxy wrote:The bit about UD is a decent description of what I did. I think it's laughable that you find it scum-indicative.
I want you to tell everyone here what's that "thing I can't talk about", pleaseIn post 1240, Oxy wrote: In retrospect, pintu reaching out to work with me was really townie. I don't see why that comes from scum!pintu but there is a thing I can't talk about holding me back ever so slightly.
based on my own history:In post 1367, Sunshine13 wrote:Oh, I did want to ask if math is likely to bus a scumbuddy on d1 in a game like this.
yeah pls noIn post 1365, pinturicchio wrote:I want you to tell everyone here what's that "thing I can't talk about", pleaseIn post 1240, Oxy wrote: In retrospect, pintu reaching out to work with me was really townie. I don't see why that comes from scum!pintu but there is a thing I can't talk about holding me back ever so slightly.
^ this is consistent with my reading he also tends to clear it first.Mathdino wrote:based on my own history:In post 1367, Sunshine13 wrote:Oh, I did want to ask if math is likely to bus a scumbuddy on d1 in a game like this.
A. i'm scum with creature or other "most readable players onsite"
B. i'm scum with NSG or other "players mathdino should never get wrong"
C. i have an excuse to policy lynch my scumbuddy
otherwise i just don't see much value in bussing tbh
Ooooooooooooh!!!!In post 1366, Oxy wrote:That would break site rules.
Yes. What subject?In post 1372, pinturicchio wrote:Want to cooperate with me?
Tell me your three most scumreads please (I know I can ISO you and look at it but I'm like... REALLY tired. Pretty please?)In post 1373, Oxy wrote:Yes. What subject?In post 1372, pinturicchio wrote:Want to cooperate with me?