In post 657, Oxy wrote:@thor if you're town, please give me your thoughts on a world where I am also town
If you're town then either I'm very wrong on Elephant (don't feel it) or Teacher is fakeclaiming (possible, scum knew it was safe).
I find it highly unlikely both scum were off the wagon.
For a theory Elephant partner I'd...I dunno, seems daft. Nauci I guess if I was forced to say a name.
For Teacher I'd tend to expect Flicker or Nauci. Meji would be a daft combo.
Okay, here's an example of him hanging back on topics;
Look at both the Thor and James wagon. Note when Oxy's attacks start vs. when his vote comes in. He basically spends all of Day 1 sheeping teacher. On Day 2 he got in on Meji late, and only moved to me after both Teacher had voted me and I'd voted Oxy. That's a wagon hanger, not a wagon leader.
For his empty cheerleading, let's look at this;
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p10145277
He attacks me (for hypocrisy).
He repeats the attack when i don't answer right away (a follow up attack by inference)
I then answer.
He doesn't rebut my answer, he just goes "hah, scum!" even though he has shown no hypocrisy. That is just empty noise, he's trying to make it *seem* like there's a reason to scum read me, when in fact there's nothing.
Here's another;
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p10139516
Thor is scum for not townreading my undercutting of teacher!
I ask him why should I town read it and point out there is no undercutting of any worth.
He counters that he took it from, like (making up these numbers, but they are thematically accurate) 400% Thor is scum to 20% Thor is scum.
I point out that he then is still agreeing with the case and voting me, so where is the undercut I'm supposed to town read him for?
He cuts off the conversation because it's "muddying the waters and distracting town"
That's not someone trying to understand me or show me something.
Here's another
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p10139355
He says I'm flailing, that I yelled at him, that this makes me scum (for reasons...?)
I point out that I didn't do any of those things and ask for a quote showing where I did.
He comes back with the "can't respond, Thor is just good at debate" claim and ducks the question.
I guess I am pretty brilliant at debate when you make up stuff and I ask you why you believe it...? How clever and word twisting of me?
It's an entire ISO like that.
Saying lots without saying anything.
In post 659, Not Known 15 wrote: In post 656, Thor665 wrote:If Meji implicates me, why are you lynching me before Meji exactly? Am I scum if Meji isn't?
You being town would erase that implication that also implicates themselves if you are scum
If you are scum then we can catch every possible partner via power roles and lynch.
If Meji is scum and we lynch them tomorrow we have a much smaller pool of suspects if you are town.
If you and Meji are town we lose anyways..., unless, of course either me or teacher catch scum tonight. Especially if I catch scum.
@Elephant yeah please don't hammer asap, that was an overreaction.
I'll agree that lynching people gives you a smaller pool.
What I'm asking is what is this super strong Thor/Meji connection exactly? All you have is that I didn't vote him when I was on a wagon of someone else that was larger and indicated I would only move if the Meji wagon got larger, and that she hasn't voted me (even though she hasn't really been around to vote me).
That's pretty much it.
That's super thin, and is *not* a good reason to lynch either of us.
What is the actual case that either of us is scum that isn't about us not voting each other?
I submit there isn't one on me, and only a very minor one on Meji. I'm fine with that, but you need to be aware of it to make accurate value calls in game and not overreact.