Lurking isnt a scumtellIn post 868, Tywin Lannister wrote:Name one for brass, beyond lurking.
I have said why im voting brass
Lurking isnt a scumtellIn post 868, Tywin Lannister wrote:Name one for brass, beyond lurking.
ewIn post 869, Srceenplay wrote:Lol.In post 865, Wisdom wrote:Ank lets stay on brass
Wisdom: “ whoa whoa whoa, hold up I didn’t think you’re going to actually vote him, calm the fuck down. I was just distancing.”
What's your case on brass?In post 872, Ankamius wrote:Hey Tywin, do you have a case?
He's got a point. One which you can't deny.In post 877, Wisdom wrote:ewIn post 869, Srceenplay wrote:Lol.In post 865, Wisdom wrote:Ank lets stay on brass
Wisdom: “ whoa whoa whoa, hold up I didn’t think you’re going to actually vote him, calm the fuck down. I was just distancing.”
The 'case' you gave on me in your catchup can be simplified to scumreading me because I defended Zito when he was the primary wagon of the day. You also have yet to answer my questions, which involves me asking why my followup play would make sense if I'm scum and Zito's town.In post 878, Tywin Lannister wrote:What's your case on brass?In post 872, Ankamius wrote:Hey Tywin, do you have a case?
Lynching a lurker on D2 means you should be lynched first, since you replaced for one D1.
I gave my case. You have none on brass. He's just the easy lynchbait. The most you can say is he is a lurker, yet so was the person you replaced. Guess that means you gots to go by your own reasoning. Deus Vult.
This is buzzwords and smoke, not a case.In post 862, Tywin Lannister wrote:I'm certain because the pushback. She's done nothing townie all game. I fundamentally dislike her reads, playstyle, lack of substance, deflections, hard defences of scummy players, buddying/flip flopping whenever it seems beneficial and opportune, etc. She's scum.
Lol. So scum is one of you actives?
In post 888, Wisdom wrote:zombie isnt necessarily scum?
This slip is adorableIn post 890, Wisdom wrote:nevermind the zombie is scum
99 point...... 8 per centIn post 895, Srceenplay wrote:You guys sure you don’t want to lynch the worst
You're right. I misred it. Thanks for personally insulting me, because I don't trust you in a Mafia game.In post 881, Wisdom wrote:tbh Im starting to think Tywin is just Yume levels of bad
Has anyone played with Tywin before
Literally nothing you've written matters. My case doesn't have to be good to make Brass' case any better. You have NOT given a case on him, and I've asked three times now. You keep deflecting back on my case towards you, but you cannot do anything with it besides try to discredit it with your own buzzwords. Regardless, your case on brass does not exist. You vote him because he lurks, yet you replaced a lurker, therefore I can vote you for the exact same reasoning. Everything else is sugar on top of my own read. I don't have to convince YOU that you're scum. I just have to keep voting you until I'm inevitably mislynched or NK'd, and then you'll have to contend with others.In post 882, Ankamius wrote:The 'case' you gave on me in your catchup can be simplified to scumreading me because I defended Zito when he was the primary wagon of the day. You also have yet to answer my questions, which involves me asking why my followup play would make sense if I'm scum and Zito's town.In post 878, Tywin Lannister wrote:What's your case on brass?In post 872, Ankamius wrote:Hey Tywin, do you have a case?
Lynching a lurker on D2 means you should be lynched first, since you replaced for one D1.
I gave my case. You have none on brass. He's just the easy lynchbait. The most you can say is he is a lurker, yet so was the person you replaced. Guess that means you gots to go by your own reasoning. Deus Vult.
And this?
This is buzzwords and smoke, not a case.In post 862, Tywin Lannister wrote:I'm certain because the pushback. She's done nothing townie all game. I fundamentally dislike her reads, playstyle, lack of substance, deflections, hard defences of scummy players, buddying/flip flopping whenever it seems beneficial and opportune, etc. She's scum.
Spoiler:
All these posts are you going on and on about how scummy I am but not actually substantiating them. You're grandstanding because you don't actually have a case. You have a point that I could be defending Zito if we're both scum and my predecessor replacing out without making a single post here, which is very weak by itself.
But apparently I'm scum for a lot more than that, despite your inability to explain it.
This is scum. Lynch this.