Bizarrely your response 770 to my Nauci case 468 makes me feel worse about you.
1. You say it is "factually incorrect" that Nauci "tries to build a scum case from their lurking." Look at the post I linked -- 65. Nauci read TGP/NK (jailkeeper) as scum from "straight lack of content bias" and because "HE did that in a game" where he was scum. That is a scum case from lurking - factually correct.
2. "Vanity wagon" is a phrase you must have heard as an SE. It is a one vote wagon that will not gain traction to a lynch. Moreover, suggesting I am scumming someone for voting me shows a stunning lack of appreciation for the game. I cannot have said more times that I get why I am suspect, and didnt blame people for voting me. I blame Nauci for staying there even in the late day when it is clear I could not be a consensus.
3. Again, you say it is "factually incorrect" that Nauci "provid[ed] intent to L-1 but doesnt". But 227 says "consider this intent to -1". But after four hours in which she could confirm the VC, she does not 236 and instead disappears. Again, factually accurate.
4. I did cite my own post, because it explained the misrep.
5. There is a reason this was fifth on my list, and described with the word "possible." I dont see it as a strong tell, but also dont think by this point (post 96) Nauci was falling behind at all.
6. I don't think point 6 is absurd. Hell, Nauci didnt. To quote DDS from early game, sick Nauci used the game as a "crutch." For sick Nauci not to do so is inconsistent from who she had portrayed herself to be. FWIW, I am even more leery of your slot for this sort of semi-outside game reason now. I find it hard to believe someone who was on serious painkillers and in heavy withdrawal would return to work totally slammed -- I would expect most workplaces to be somewhat accommodating of a sickness as severe as Nauci portrayed. I still dont put much weight on it, but dont think its absurd to read this way.
To respond to 771, I see two issues.
Compare this:
With this:In post 771, brassherald wrote:Trying to coordinate on lynches, though is a good thing.
So we shouldnt expect analysis? Why is a readslist not useful to anyone else? I find them useful.In post 771, brassherald wrote:I will not do a read list. It's not useful for me, and I don't feel it is ever useful for anyone else to read them. I will not budge on this ever again.
Compare this:
With this:In post 771, brassherald wrote:Sheeping is distinctly negative utility for town.
And consider the background strategy. Forming a town block negates the inherent block mafia can have, and can provide tells if you move the block around during the day for wagon analysis. I will try to dig up a strategy article from back in the day when I used to play more, but at least then, building a block was a big strategic bonus.In post 771, brassherald wrote:Trying to coordinate on lynches, though is a good thing.