In post 435, the worst wrote:Ausuka how is 429wallpostofdeath tonally?
gimme some examples from it you see from town!Ircher or scum!Ircher & explain why? (just a couple are fine)
AND FINALLY .......... does Ircher try this hard + risk this much exposure as scum? not a loaded question
I unvoted there because the post was massive and I felt like I needed to evaluate it before pushing further w/ pushing him. Ircher's posts aren't that bad but, like, he just doesn't give out the same obvtown feeling he usually does when he's town, you know?
Ircher wrote:17. 92 by Mathdino: Fake advertisement for Pick Your Power X/Y where mod chooses the mafia - I'm biased against Mathdino, and it shows. But still, people have to understand where I am coming from. You can joke around and all, that's fine. But I get the feeling you are avoiding scumhunting because you can. Like, you were very wordy the first page or 2, but then you kinda vanished only to pop in to post things that are not very helpful in advancing the game state. Is it truly as unfair of me as has been suggested to see you as doing much more setup speccing than scumhunting?
tbh, this kinda pings me. And I don't really like how his only townread rn is himself despite openly giving TRs to people in his catchup.
But I don't think I want to lynch Ircher yet because I think I can sort him with 99% accuracy later, and the way he's working through the thread and making notes is pretty towny.
432 from mutant does also ping me pretty severely as I've mentioned- when someone you're currently voting and trying to read posts content, you read it, you just don't ignore it because you think there's too much. I don't see how this is a town mindset. But I don't think this is too likely to be a bus, and that gives me pause.
In post 440, mutantdevle wrote: In post 433, Ausuka wrote:UNVOTE:
Mutant, you're voting Ircher. Why won't you read his posts?
Why the plural? I'm only not reading one of them because it's blatantly too long. I started reading it and saw that he was simply quoting every other post and describing it as null. What do I gain from reading that?
How is it too long? It's simply multiple long posts, compressed into one post. There's no reason why you can't read it, and as for "he's calling everything null!!!" that is absolutely not what the post is, on any level. As to what you gain from it, you get to sort Ircher -- although if I'm right, and you're scum here, that makes a lot of sense, because you already know what Ircher's alignment, and you're only worried about perception of you, which is why you CTRL+F'd the post to search for your name, and nothing else.
In post 445, SaskeIsMyYaoiKismesis wrote: In post 419, Ausuka wrote:77- Simyk, why do you refer to the Beefster wagon as a "thinly-veiled policy lynch"? It seems like nothing of the sort to me and I have to wonder how you came to that conclusion.
The reasons for scumreading Beefster originated from reasons that could ALTERNATIVELY be answered by "He's just BAD" so to me it's hard to SAY if what he's doing can REALLY be perceived as scummy - hence "policy lynch" (*´ω｀)o
Uhhhh... I don't really see how this is your assessment of the Beefster wagon??? How does being bad explain roleclaiming on page 1 when you think your scumread was rolefishing???
In post 445, SaskeIsMyYaoiKismesis wrote:
Ausuka-chan why did you UNVOTE ircher? Were his RECENT posts indicative of his TOWN meta I don't really townread them so YEAH? （・□・；）
I UNVOTED ircher because I NO LONGER feel that his posts make him CAUGHT SCUM so I would prefer some more TIME to EVALUATE him ^_^
Part of me feels like this post never exists if Mathdino and Ircher are both town.
In post 452, SaskeIsMyYaoiKismesis wrote:For the PURPOSE of the RECORD, Janitor, my INITIAL INTELLECTUAL INTUITION is that your IDENTITY is Something_Smart ╭( ･ㅂ･)و ̑̑ ＂
Oh? I thought he was fuzzylogic.
yeah. not because they're scumreading each other as Math says later, but because Ircher as town can't really be classified as bad town/VI. Although I'm not sure how mutant comes to the same conclusion without knowing Ircher (unless he actually does, but I thought Ircher only just returned to the site?)
In post 454, the worst wrote:let's get some ausuka critical thinking on ircher's slot, she was not lying about her read accuracy as far as i can tell
I wasn't but this Ircher takes longer to read than the other Irchers
yeah, maybe Ircher is just scum here.
yeah... I still think beefster is scum here. maybe beef/ircher/lalendra? does that work as a team?
In post 492, Almost50 wrote:
Let's do this. At least I won't be playing with "the silliest name that ever was" anymore. I had promised myself not to play in games with that person anyway, but I didn't know that was them.
...Do you think she's RC? She isn't.
except I wasn't like this. at all.
Ircher's
520 makes me think he might actually be town here; I like the readslist. but I just feel like something important is missing here with his play which makes him locktown in most of the towngames we play together.
In post 533, Mathdino wrote:wait is this some kind of threat
like "lol the earlier you lynch me the more likely it is town loses"
because if so
:lol::lol:
that's actually a towntell for Ircher though.
Mathdino wrote:You don't fucking spoiler your reads list if you want it to affect the game.
Ircher does. It's just a way to stop it clogging up the thread and to organize the post, I think.
Also Ircher has a really weird habit of putting actual reads in null/neutral sections and it's probably best to just ignore the categories. Like
here where he has a -55% read on a player and puts them in a neutral category + only has two players above null other than himself. I feel like this could legitimately be town!Ircher rn, although I am kinda waffling and want to see more from him.
It's too late at night for me to deal with this. I'm gone. I'll reply more in depth tomorrow if I have the time because I've been very busy lately and it's hindered my enthusiasm for this at the moment, and I'm working to not let that happen.
