Okay, so for this first question, it was more me stating that it was hard for me to read him. I feel like he is playing badly. Not sure if he is just trying to be too active and is coming across scummy, or if he is actually scum. I would personally like to think that scum wouldn't be as blatantly out and obvious like this.In post 333, Scioness Sajj wrote:is this a comment to Icher's posts on past few pages? If so, what makes those posts look scummy to you?In post 330, TheRampage wrote:I swear, if Jester were a possibility in this game, Ircher would be sure fire Jester. Can't tell if bad town or scrum though
In post 301, TheRampage wrote:My only other possible is NorthSideGal. I say possible they are rubbing me the wrong way with that post using meta from other games. I personally think that is bad reasoning for mafia. I have played with people who change their strategy to keep people on their toes and not be able to use meta, and I have seen people play the exact same whether they are town or mafia. So, I just find it funny that on day 1 when there really isn't much to go off of, that they have meta reads on just about everyone. Still, to me, it really isn't actionable, but it is definitely something I will be keeping my eyes on.
Since there isn't much to go off D1 why is it bad that NSG is using her previous experiences with players to form reads? (also I think you didn't carefully read her posts, she only has two reads of meta, really).
Has ofrhz replacing out changed your opinion?Right now though, I think ofrhz is the one I feel most comfortable with for the reasons I stated several posts ago. He has stayed under the radar, not leading any lynches. I he tried to test the waters for a Vulcan lynch, but never committed until other people hopped on. All those are scum things to me; cause he was leading it, but not really trying to sound like he was leading it. It has been almost 24 hours since I pointed that out, and he had not popped in yet, and I find it hard to believe he hasn't read it yet.
What's your experience with playing forum mafia?
For the second question, I stated why I didn't agree with using meta. People don't always play the same exact way every time they play town or mafia. Some people play the same no matter what. You are actually kind of fooling yourself if you use meta as a reason to vote one way or another. That is my personal opinion.
Third, that is a difficult question to answer. In a perfect world, a new player would mean a new opportunity. But the problem is that we are under the gun with the deadline and I feel like I had a good read on ofrhz. Some have pointed out that scum wouldn't replace out, but I really feel like that is not true, especially when one is being looked at. Now, do I feel bad for teacher having to come in behind him and have votes already on him because of another player...what it comes down to is this, if my read on ofrhz is right, then it doesn't matter how well teacher plays or comes off town, cause essentially he has the same role. So of ofrhz was scum, then so is teacher.
My experience playing mafia was as a game on a community forum with T-Bone and at least one other person from here that I know of. We played one game at a time on two different forums, and I played for maybe close to a year or two. I have done poorly and I have done well...just as I assume everyone else who plays this game has done. I do have some experience from outside of this forum, and it will take some getting to know some of the exacts from this forum, but the game is still essentially the same.