In post 64, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:UNVOTE:
I don't have a single town read yet...if you're town can you start doing towny things please?
Thanks.
What happened in between these two votes to make you vote Jar?In post 71, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What about it comes across asIn post 66, Invisibility wrote: they seem like an awkward attempt for scum to seem like town for agreeing with criticisms.awkwardto you?
On another note, I have my first town read!
VOTE: JJD
I also don't understand why this is question you're pressing. This kind of seems like fishing for a relevant question to ask now that you're coming in to make a voteIn post 71, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What about it comes across asIn post 66, Invisibility wrote: they seem like an awkward attempt for scum to seem like town for agreeing with criticisms.awkwardto you?
On another note, I have my first town read!
VOTE: JJD
I really don't like this post. One complete filler paragraph and one that feels very forced and defensive in a passive-aggressive way.In post 72, TheRampage wrote:While this is true, the whole reason for having Padme go on the run and not be in the Senate was so that Jar Jar could be manipulated into recommending emergency powers for Palpatine. Jar Jar was placed for that exact reason. But yeah, Jar Jar was annoying, but he played an important role in the saga.In post 45, JarJarDrinks wrote:Padme made him supreme chancellor in the first place. And anakin was as annoying of a character.
What do u think of Shoshins Garuga read (and her vote on you) ?
Anyways, I think Shoshins is fishing with their reads. We have 3 pages right now and in my eyes, there really hasn't been any slips. I think Shoshin is trying to force a slip and is setting a trap. Still, I am not really thinking anything of Shoshin's read or vote on me. Their reasoning is very poor and based off of my first post, and apparently to them, everything I write is scummy. Possibly even this post.
It's a tough call between Shoshin being scum and setting a trap and Shoshin being scum and hoping for a mislynch?In post 80, TheRampage wrote:I am gonna UNVOTE:
I feel like Shirt on is trying to trap and it is failing. Either that or hoping the newb is an easy target for lynching as scum. Tough call. Will wait as the day drags on.
this way of thinking and just expressing it without anyone asking/pressuring you toIn post 74, havingfitz wrote:What inIn post 69, bacy wrote:i feel likeIn post 65, Garuga wrote:My current pet theory on this game is that havingfitz was scum, my vote on him made Scumsibility worried and he wants to discredit me, and Sho is scum playing a different angle. These are very premature reads though.thiskinda stuff are very hard to fake as scum"this"is hard for scum to fake?
but it's the best scumread you've got so far im guessing, right? i really don't see why you wouldn't wanna vote here unless there's some shady business going onIn post 88, TheRampage wrote:I unvoted because I wished to remove my initial joke vote since the game has taken a turn for the serious. Now like I said, I did not vote Shoshin yet because I am not solid on believing he is scum.In post 87, JarJarDrinks wrote:Agree with this. Like why unvote in the same post?In post 82, Garuga wrote:If you suspect Shoshin, why aren't you voting her? After all, we just had a discussion about this topic.In post 80, TheRampage wrote:I am gonna UNVOTE:
I feel like Shirt on is trying to trap and it is failing. Either that or hoping the newb is an easy target for lynching as scum. Tough call. Will wait as the day drags on.
i think he means "Why would you make an RVS vote rather than a vote for something suspicious"In post 93, Jodaxq wrote:I'm confused at where you're coming from. He didn't RVS vote for something suspicious. I thought that was the whole point?In post 34, Gustavo wrote:Cause you don’t rvs vote over something suspicious
39 was my opening post.In post 95, Jodaxq wrote:In post 39, JarJarDrinks wrote:Is it cuz u dont like Jar Jar. Or u dont like people making fun of Jar Jar's name?
Answer may affect where I vote.These kind of questions seem scummy to me. The answers would clutter the thread with some useless informationIn post 40, JarJarDrinks wrote:Meaning u were planning to vote for me or ur mad that he made the games first vote?
O Cmon I cant have a little fun? I asked a legit question to go along with it.In post 96, Jodaxq wrote:In post 44, TheRampage wrote:It was because I was gonna vote for you and make some off handed comment about how Jar Jar sucks and turned the Galactic Republic into and Empire by getting Chancellor Palpatine Emergency Powers.In post 40, JarJarDrinks wrote:Meaning u were planning to vote for me or ur mad that he made the games first vote?As I was sayingIn post 45, JarJarDrinks wrote:Padme made him supreme chancellor in the first place. And anakin was as annoying of a character.
What do u think of Shoshins Garuga read (and her vote on you) ?
I believe the former is supposed to mean that Shoshin is town and setting a trap for scum. Which seems like a weird POV for rampage to have since that would make HIM scum. Especially since he says it's "failing".In post 104, Jodaxq wrote:It's a tough call between Shoshin being scum and setting a trap and Shoshin being scum and hoping for a mislynch?In post 80, TheRampage wrote:I am gonna UNVOTE:
I feel like Shirt on is trying to trap and it is failing. Either that or hoping the newb is an easy target for lynching as scum. Tough call. Will wait as the day drags on.
Jar also interpreted my meaning in the worst possible light without any reason to do so, and that bias isn't "normal" at this point in the game.In post 98, Jodaxq wrote:I find this pretty strange. He asked a question on something that seemed out of place and voted. That's a pretty normal happening in a game of mafia. I don't see how it stands out this much to you other than that it's a vote for you.In post 51, Shoshin wrote:If I didn't find Rampage scummy, I'd vote Jar for that shallow attempt to throw a vote my way.
I understand why you'd read this as defensive but that wasn't my intent - I was clarifying 51.In post 99, Jodaxq wrote:This comes across as defensive. No one else had even commented yet.In post 55, Shoshin wrote:The problem with Jar is that he's making his case on me before trying to understand my thinking. That's how scum play, not town.
Ok here's what I see as the facts:In post 113, Shoshin wrote:Jar also interpreted my meaning in the worst possible light without any reason to do so, and that bias isn't "normal" at this point in the game.In post 98, Jodaxq wrote:I find this pretty strange. He asked a question on something that seemed out of place and voted. That's a pretty normal happening in a game of mafia. I don't see how it stands out this much to you other than that it's a vote for you.In post 51, Shoshin wrote:If I didn't find Rampage scummy, I'd vote Jar for that shallow attempt to throw a vote my way.
my point was, no one pressured him to give that kind of a detailed read. which means he was genuinely thinking about it. that kinda read doesnt generally come from scum naturallyIn post 115, havingfitz wrote:@ bacy...but Garuga was under pressure for his post 18. He would stand to benefit as scum (or town) to explain himself. Why would he double down on me being scum...and also call out his defender (Shosin) as scum...but instead vote someone he has not given any reason for voting because their wagon looked more promising? How is any of that coming from town?
I didn't say anything inconsistent. You're assuming that defending Garuga means I automatically agree with Garuga's perception (that his own post is bad). You also ignored 47, which clarified the meaning in 46.In post 114, JarJarDrinks wrote:- I ask you why your defending a bad post and you imply that the reason is because Garuga admitted himself that the post is bad
- I point out that's inconsistent with what you've said so far
You dont that that's a natural assumption to make based of of this:In post 117, Shoshin wrote:You're assuming that defending Garuga means I automatically agree with Garuga's perception (that his own post is bad).
This post is confusing.In post 119, Shoshin wrote:No, that's not a natural assumption. Townies don't think to themselves, "oh, X feels town, so now I automatically agree with everything X says."
No, that's not what I'm saying. But your overuse of leading questions is also scummy.In post 121, JarJarDrinks wrote:This post is confusing.In post 119, Shoshin wrote:No, that's not a natural assumption. Townies don't think to themselves, "oh, X feels town, so now I automatically agree with everything X says."
Are you saying that I'm calling you scummy because you don't agree with Garuga even tho u townread him?
Like what is this referring to?In post 119, Shoshin wrote:Townies don't think to themselves, "oh, X feels town, so now I automatically agree with everything X says."
