Resistance Game #3- 6p with Leadership

ISO · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2018 9:11 pm

In post 373, the worst wrote:ya we got an OK info round out of the scum mission so now we wind things up with the towniest 2 players as leaders

FTR this means you/spyconeum

BuJaber · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2018 9:14 pm

In post 369, TheBrie wrote:Hmm, it seems to me that there's quite a reasonable chance of scum not sabotaging the first mission. At least if there's only one on the mission. Because if the first mission fails, we get fairly specific information.

Mission two a townie might vote if they felt confident about who was on it, but that probably won't happen?

Bu, that's all about how we should have played and not information especially relevant to the current game, right?

(later, after doing important other stuff)

Which question is for me?

Yes sorry I was just explaining why you always repeat at least one person from mission 1 if mission 1 passes.

If mission 1 fails you pick 3 new people because you want to find the 2nd scum first generally speaking.
You won't necessary know who from just mission 2 obviously but if you pick 3 new players you also just win if mission 1 had both scum.

TheBrie · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2018 9:17 pm

Useful for next time. Thanks.

Pine · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2018 9:23 pm

I am doubling down on my intention to veto any team involving BuJ. Do you guys not see how a complete lack of anyone prepared to oppose him (other than myself) practically screams that he is scum? If he were town, the easy path of least resistance would be to continue to oppose having him on the team. That would virtually guarantee a scum win. The lack of this sort of resistance is essentially a guarantee that he is scum.

ISO · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2018 9:26 pm

Tfw leader mechanic muddies vca

Pine · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2018 9:30 pm

Ya right

TheBrie · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2018 9:35 pm

In post 378, Pine wrote:I am doubling down on my intention to veto any team involving BuJ. Do you guys not see how a complete lack of anyone prepared to oppose him (other than myself) practically screams that he is scum? If he were town, the easy path of least resistance would be to continue to oppose having him on the team. That would virtually guarantee a scum win. The lack of this sort of resistance is essentially a guarantee that he is scum.

If TGP was around that would be a valid argument. But as it is, unless TGP is purposely keeping quiet because Buj is scum, his lack of input indicates noting either way.
And you and TW(slightly) are opposing him being on the team.

BuJaber · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2018 10:23 pm

TGP was loudly and publicly opposing me.

And people don't need to oppose me when the leader doesn't even pick me.

The fact that people are voting yes for missions that I am not in is already enough opposition. I don't know how else you expect people to act with a scumread.

I specifically told you you and TGP will help prove me town and you did just that by failing two missions I wasn't a part of.

You're logic isn't just incorrect it isn't even applicable to this game.

BuJaber · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2018 10:23 pm

Above is @pine

Iconeum · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 1:38 am

Going against my team is basicly a scumclaim right now

Iconeum · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 1:39 am

Nominate: Iconeum/Buj/Brie

Iconeum · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 1:40 am

Pine needs to explain his Bujaber scumread.

Buj has not been on any of the missions that were sabotaged, right?

BuJaber · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 2:02 am

HEAL: Icon/Buj/Brie

ISO · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 2:03 am

obv I have exactly 1 concern I want to work out before I sign off on this

Iconeum · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 2:24 am

talk to me

Iconeum · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 2:25 am

Buj/Pine?

Iconeum · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 2:25 am

In post 307, the worst wrote:
In post 305, TheBrie wrote:
In post 304, the worst wrote:
In post 303, Iconeum wrote:@the worst, how come you changed your mind and are approving a mission from TGP? AND WITH PINE IN IT?
your message has been received and we will endeavour to respond within 10-15 business days.
You think you're funny don't you?
no
I'm not interested in answering that this phase
I thought my intentions were clear >:

R U interested in answering THIS phase?

BuJaber · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 2:39 am

In post 390, Iconeum wrote:Buj/Pine?

Neither of us were in mission 2.

Pine · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 3:54 am

Ah fuck it.

You people are absolutely intent on betting the game on BuJ!Town. Fine. That's the way it's gotta be. But from my perspective, the only way the current team doesn't make us lose is if TW is scum. I don't buy that.

[harm]Team[/harm]

Gotta go with my own reads here. I don't get bullied into just passing people I think are scum.

Pine · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 3:55 am

HURT: Team

brassherald · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 4:18 am

Up for approval is Iconeum/BuJaber/The Brie

1 vote for/1 against

TheGoldenParadox · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 5:20 am

HURT: team
that team has both scum on it so no

Pine · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 5:45 am

I am suddenly far less comfortable with my veto.

Pine · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 5:46 am

On the plus side, I'm a lot happier with the TGP SR

Iconeum · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2018 6:02 am

Tgp pine scum confirmed