How do I know scum doesn't want to give someone an all 0?In post 305, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Fire: pings me, but I can't tell if that's because badtown or scum. I'm leaning badtown.In post 235, Taly wrote:Meh... Do you have a read on their play, then?In post 211, TehBrawlGuy wrote:My take on it, as is my take on most early claims, is that I don't really care. I could give you 5 reasons town!pun makes that claim and 5 reasons scum!pun makes it, but it's all baseless speculation.
From my experience, people like to read roles and claims a lot more than players (see also: some of the chatter on espe/dunn), and it's a mistake early in the game. Shelve the claims, develop reads on actual play.
I just don't get tonereads, as in, I'm not someone who uses tone to gamesolve, usually.
I'm very case-style, and that doesn't merge too well with current site-meta.
I'm having second thoughts onFire. I didn't like that they minimized me trying to interact with them. I can't tell if he was playstyle clashing with me or overtly trying to dismiss me. He could've easily responded to my points, and instead he found reasons to state that I wasn't oriented to gamesolving. 84 - 87 and 88
I also don't know what to think aboutEspeandDunn'sclaims at the moment. I don't have a strong read on either of them, and coincidentally, I'm leaning to the suspicion side forVaxandFire.
Vaxbecause he's just drifting in the game and fluffposting; like an active lurker.
Firebecause I'm afraid I'm townreading scum, and he would be the first person I'd rethink.
If I had to number based off reads, I'd put them all near mid-range, but I don't think that's optimal.
How do you feel about these 4?
I'd rather not mislynch at all. If I were going to put someone at a 0 as a scumread, I'd be weary on whether everyone's doing it or not.In post 211, TehBrawlGuy wrote:That's just a mislynch though? I don't get why you're opposed to this. Yes, if we hit the wrong target, someone Town dies, because that's how lynches work - and we're not usually shy about lynching. I've been thinking about it more, and I'm strongly in favor of having two pseudo-lynches today. If we don't do that, I'd bet dollars to donuts Scum rank people weirdly to fuck with the numbers behind the scenes. The reasons for doing it to save another scummate are clear, but they also benefit from keeping someone Town alive who should've died to the ranking, because they'll enter D2 as mislynch bait.In post 199, Taly wrote: Ehhh... I have reservations of literally pointing out someone and all of us collectively give them 0s. If they're town, that's basically a free sacrifice for scum.
Is there anyone that has warranted a 0 from you, yet?
Espe: Has been pretty content to talk a lot about his role and the mechanics, but hasn't chimed in on much else. I consider focusing on that kind of role-centric discussion and avoiding giving any stances a pretty universal scumtell.
Dunn: Not a lot to go on, but seems genuine in the content he has. town lean
Vax: Town, as stated in my last post.
I get that you'd rather not mislynch, but surely you see that putting the two upcoming deaths in Town's hands completely is better than leaving it influenced by Scum? We should all just agree to 0 the top two vote getters for today. I'm willing to go on record agreeing to it now. I'll 0 the two top vote getters today.
And why are you voting based on who gets votes by others? What if it was one of your poorly articulated townreads? Your posting is noncomittal and easy to flow with.
THIS is what I'm talking about.In post 306, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Re-read PP and I don't see anything that jumps out to me as particularly scummy, and I'm not going to re-read all of Taly's posts. I still think it's not TvT though.
I suppose if I'm going to endorse pseudolynches I should vote. VOTE: espe.
Instead, you push the easy-
There's just nothing in the motive of your posts that actually entail that you want to gamesolve or find conclusions conducive to aiding the gamestate.