8 days left on deadline is not the time to be yammering about this.In post 1855, Mathdino wrote:Tfw I can't policy lynch 5 peopleIn post 1854, Almost50 wrote:Not Voting: HeWhoSwims, HitAlt, Zoronos, davesaz, BlackStar,
pedit: me too
8 days left on deadline is not the time to be yammering about this.In post 1855, Mathdino wrote:Tfw I can't policy lynch 5 peopleIn post 1854, Almost50 wrote:Not Voting: HeWhoSwims, HitAlt, Zoronos, davesaz, BlackStar,
I meant like, if you think my case is good/towny, but it's wrong, wouldn't you be most interested in convincing me out of it (compared to the others)In post 1868, pinturicchio wrote:I don't get your question. Do you mean I should be discussing with you? I'm not discussing with anyone at this moment, so I would gladly talk to you.
Thanks for answers.In post 1794, davesaz wrote:Open question: who am I trying to case in my recent posting.
Yes, really.In post 1874, Zoronos wrote:Really? I read it as you FoS'ing ofrhz.In post 1871, pinturicchio wrote:Funny hahaIn post 1870, davesaz wrote:Funny haha or funny someone's scummy?
Probably because nobody knows who you're casing or what the case is.In post 1877, davesaz wrote:Thanks for answers.
Why hasn't anyone commented either way on the case itself?
As I said, I'm not discussing with anyone at this moment, I had my rant, I'm more relaxed now. And don't get me wrong, even if I think that other players are biased about me because my shitty D1 play, well... I had a shitty D1 play so I get that I'm one of the best lynch options right now. Problem is, I'm not scum, so I know I'm not the best option. But things are getting interesting.In post 1876, ruru wrote:I meant like, if you think my case is good/towny, but it's wrong, wouldn't you be most interested in convincing me out of it (compared to the others)In post 1868, pinturicchio wrote:I don't get your question. Do you mean I should be discussing with you? I'm not discussing with anyone at this moment, so I would gladly talk to you.
I realized after writing it that it's kind of an unfair/confbiasy question and arguing with people other than me can also influence my opinion or expose scum motivation in their reads
In post 1836, Mathdino wrote:The above post is directed at Zor
We don't have the votes to lynch Hitalt right now because NO ONE IS VOTING
I would like more discussion on pintu vs Hitalt but again NO ONE IS VOTING
I'm actually scumreading pintu more than Hitalt as of now
But Hitalt incessantly tunneling TW/me makes me feel less bad about potentially mislynching him
I would love to be neighbors.In post 1882, Mathdino wrote:Dammit I really wish I had a neighbour this game
I feel like I'm playing with my hands tied behind my back
The case is that tw vs jjh was svs through and through. Possibly with a side of hitalt.In post 1879, Zoronos wrote:Who
Make it look like TW vs JJH is SvS.
I do think there's a chance she's scum with Math, and both pushing me (one active pushing and the other passive pushing) is a good strat. But that's just a theory; ofrhz have up and downs this game that pings me. At the begining, when she was being pushed, it looked like an easy mislynch just like in Pick Your Poison, but now is completely different, maybe because she's no longer under pressure. I insist, I get that on first sight I am a good lynch, but playing bad is not equal to scum, so ofrhz pushing me is pushing the easy wagon, and she doesn't do that as town (she got mislynched on D1 when she got the entire scumteam right, and in Newbie 1859 she had no problems pushing strong players). Math, on the other hand, is pushing anyone lynchable at this point, but coming from him, that's more likely to be town than scum: he just wants to end this day to advance, and I think that is a good strategy. But then again, that "own agenda" is messing with his reads, 'cause I'm lynchable, but not scum.In post 1881, ruru wrote:Who do you actually suspect atm pin
Because you're saying people pushing you have an agenda, and ofrhz was pushing you since d1 I think?