In post 273, 123456789 wrote:
6. In
211:
Ausuka wrote: What I meant by "competent" wasn't "decent townplay and decent reads" just "will not make a hero shot on obvious town and generally use president power in a VI way" so that means we can elect Mylo or me too. And that's just the townies that are obvious via meta
Clarify what you mean by "and generally use president power in a VI way". As far as I'm aware, VI generally stands for Village Idiot here, and I don't think that's what you mean.
That's what I mean. Basically what I meant was that they would use their shot competently.
In post 273, 123456789 wrote:
10. In
245:
Ausuka wrote:I would be very, very surprised if there is no mechanic related to the crier ability considering that we can post policies ourselves and it feels like the mechanic would just have no purpose unless there were PRs involved. One thing that's crossed my mind is a cop/lie detector role- I thought about this a bit earlier which is why I put the "my alignment is x" in the crier formatting post. Another possible role is a sort of assassin based on crier posts? but I don't know exactly how that would work and I don't think there's a way to use it unlike the lie detector thing.
I don't think there is a mechanic related to the crier ability. I feel like it is just an additional way for parties to try to recruit people.
I mean you're very likely just wrong then. Also, what do we have to lose? Nothing. Because anything that's said in a crier post can be said in a normal post, which is exactly why the mechanic is related to roles in the first place. I stand by the fact that any candidate should 100% announce their alignment, or someone else's, in a post (for example, "Wraith is aligned with the Town.")
^Refusing to give game-related content. This is scum!Mylo.
In post 335, Ruby Red wrote:@ausuka any updates to the readslist in
211
have some questions but dont want to be asking about outdated reads
I'll post an updated version at the end of this post.
In post 345, Aronis wrote: In post 342, Tazaro wrote:
Join Fighting Dreamers' party; or, heck, vote for me and get me elected--I'll take care of things <iron fist>
I feel like only scum would make a name that long. I'd be more inclined to join the lynch scum day 1 party, but I don't have any faith in their ability to actually do what they say.
clearly scum who doesn't want a member dead day 1
In post 361, Tazaro wrote:
Or policy dump Theme Park denizens into a lynch pool. Or whatever group you please. What is your pleasure, Aronis?
what...? what does being in Theme Park have to do with anything?
This is scummy.
In post 367, Tazaro wrote:How can you have death row without having some people already in lynch pool prison?
I'm seriously not sure what you're getting at. We execute scummy people. Lynchpools are optional and putting people in lynchpools based on districts is just ridiculous.
Just don't believe her if she claims a guilty
Blind bandits is probably town.
A
u
s
u
k
a
R
u
b
y
R
e
d
N
o
t
K
n
o
w
n
1
5
h
e
b
i
c
h
a
n
B
l
i
n
d
B
a
n
d
i
t
s
E
d
o
s
u
r
i
s
t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
W
h
e
m
e
s
t
a
r
I
n
v
i
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
m
u
t
a
n
t
d
e
v
l
e
F
i
r
e
b
r
i
n
g
e
r
A
r
o
n
i
s
A
r
c
a
n
g
e
l
9
N
i
c
o
R
o
b
i
n
W
r
a
i
t
h
F
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
D
R
E
A
M
E
R
S
T
a
z
a
r
o
L
u
r
k
c
o
n
e
u
m
M
y
l
o
n
i
n
j
a
1
3