He's Creature. He's not interested. His response to the wagon will be easily sortable. His flip could either support or disprove the Almost theory. What more evidence is needed?
If the almost thing is false jarjar is still scummy btw.
He's Creature. He's not interested. His response to the wagon will be easily sortable. His flip could either support or disprove the Almost theory. What more evidence is needed?
Fun fact; generally you can find roughly the number of scum in a game by dividing the number of players by 4.5.In post 123, Charles510 wrote:I'm sure my vote will change as I get better actual reads on people as the day goes on.
Question: In this setup do we know exactly how many town Vs. how many scum are in the game?
Yep, and I've explained why I believe there is a traitor. Do you actually scumread me for this?In post 128, Kublai Khan wrote:Huh. Second time Ausuka is mentioning a traitor.
VOTE: Charles510In post 123, Charles510 wrote:Question: In this setup do we know exactly how many town Vs. how many scum are in the game?
In post 115, Charles510 wrote:Bandwagons this early in day 1 seem to me more scummy than town, sothatswhere I put my vote. Makes it easier to "accidentally" lynch town.
Why am I scummy again?In post 125, Ausuka wrote: If the almost thing is false jarjar is still scummy btw.
Yeah ok maybe I'm just wrong. I don't think this applies to mountainous but it does apply to a normal setup- you always get the normal number of scum - 0.25 and 25/4=6.25 so maybe there are just 6 scum, that would make sense. iirc mafia games get more scumsided the more players there are, though, so it's still POSSIBLE we have a traitor, just not as likely as I thought.In post 130, osuka wrote:If you divide the player count by 4, you get a closer number to what you would expect from a vanilla mafia vs vanilla townies setup. I don’t think we should be talking setup right now but I feel like it’s obvious there’s 5-6 scum
Y all yall gotta be all vague and shit?In post 135, osuka wrote:Jarjar is giving me mad newbscum vibes, which is funny since he’s played more here than I have
In post 136, JarJarDrinks wrote:Y all yall gotta be all vague and shit?
In post 86, osuka wrote:follow up question: is it the only pregame case you’ve seen in a while?In post 85, JarJarDrinks wrote:best pregame case I've seen in a long time.In post 53, Pine wrote:I'm going to call an early SR on this. Some kind of combination of LAMIST and "haha let's do this anti-Town thing as a joke but no really."In post 52, osuka wrote:How about this, nobody posts anything d1 and we don’t Lynch in case we end up voting a townie
Then we convince the mafia not to kill anyone and we call it a draw
VOTE: osuka
In post 96, osuka wrote:Here’s a better question: why would anyone townread you for doing thatIn post 93, JarJarDrinks wrote:Thats what I wanna know. Why aint he townreading me for jumping on it?
In post 124, osuka wrote:In post 112, JarJarDrinks wrote:So I guess we should just give u a pass on any scumminess huh?In post 95, osuka wrote:i mean what they say will vary, but I generally get called out as being scummy very early in the game by at least some of the players. Usually during rvsIn post 92, JarJarDrinks wrote: followup to ur followup:what specifically do u get called out about? Being LAMIST?In post 59, osuka wrote:if I got a nickel for every time this was said about me
scumpoints for an unprompted self-meta this early in the gameIn post 113, JarJarDrinks wrote:I'll answer u after charles answers me.In post 96, osuka wrote:Here’s a better question: why would anyone townread you for doing thatIn post 93, JarJarDrinks wrote:Thats what I wanna know. Why aint he townreading me for jumping on it?VOTE: jarjarIn post 114, JarJarDrinks wrote:So I guess we have to lynch almost to see if we win on day 1.
VOTE: Almost50
the lynch train goes choo choo
plus the way you reacted to the push on this pageIn post 135, osuka wrote:Jarjar is giving me mad newbscum vibes, which is funny since he’s played more here than I have
If you were a traitor and wanted to flag to your team who you are, then bringing up the possibility of a traitor apropos of nothing is a pretty good beacon.In post 129, Ausuka wrote:Yep, and I've explained why I believe there is a traitor. Do you actually scumread me for this?In post 128, Kublai Khan wrote:Huh. Second time Ausuka is mentioning a traitor.
If that's true then dueling on it persistently is another way of signaling it to your team.In post 141, Kublai Khan wrote:If you were a traitor and wanted to flag to your team who you are, then bringing up the possibility of a traitor apropos of nothing is a pretty good beacon.In post 129, Ausuka wrote:Yep, and I've explained why I believe there is a traitor. Do you actually scumread me for this?In post 128, Kublai Khan wrote:Huh. Second time Ausuka is mentioning a traitor.
*low whistle*In post 142, Almost50 wrote:If that's true then dueling on it persistently is another way of signaling it to your team.In post 141, Kublai Khan wrote:If you were a traitor and wanted to flag to your team who you are, then bringing up the possibility of a traitor apropos of nothing is a pretty good beacon.In post 129, Ausuka wrote:Yep, and I've explained why I believe there is a traitor. Do you actually scumread me for this?In post 128, Kublai Khan wrote:Huh. Second time Ausuka is mentioning a traitor.