This sounds lots like "Don't scumread me and everything will be fine."In post 298, Gustavo wrote:I will always defend myself. Don’t say anything negative about me and I won’t have to respond.
We could end this day with s profli lynch. His buddies will kill me and everyone is happy.
No. But if you scum read me you have to be prepared for me to defend myself. Players should defend themselves without fear of being called “defensive” which tbh is the most laughable accusation anyone can make. You also need to do it without lying about me.In post 300, brassherald wrote:This sounds lots like "Don't scumread me and everything will be fine."In post 298, Gustavo wrote:I will always defend myself. Don’t say anything negative about me and I won’t have to respond.
We could end this day with s profli lynch. His buddies will kill me and everyone is happy.
You realize that, right?
This is basically my pointIn post 304, Ausuka wrote:That makes sense to me though w/profii? nolynching d1 definitely doesn't help the town. Like, I agree Rask's actions weren't scummy but I feel profii's actions weren't either.
Im sure. Hence the I understand but don’t agree.In post 307, brassherald wrote:Numbers have been crunched to show that a no lynch on day 1 is statistically inferior to a mislynch for town.
At least it is that way in newbie games, I would assume it holds true in larger games.
(I am a trash person)
Not sure you are in the position to criticize people’s scum hunting.In post 313, Inferno390 wrote:I THINK
That it doesn’t matter because it was just an RVS vote (which more often than not is just people jacking around at the beginning anyways) and Rask obviously didn’t actually want a No Lynch anyways, so let’s all stop talking about it because it’s not helping us hunt scum.
In post 164, Gustavo wrote:I have issues with his stances so far. Self voting and no lynch voting aren’t playing against a win condition regardless of alignment. I feel like he should know better since he’s not a newbie.
He does need to make less wordy posts though. That’s why they come off as iioa
Someone read these and let me know if they find any discrepancies. Thanks.In post 306, Gustavo wrote:I don’t really understand where you’re coming from by saying no lynching is anti-wincon. That’s not what I’m scum reading you for though. Maybe that’s the issue? I was scum reading you when I voted you. Idk how to put it but your early posts all seem so fake to me. Like you are trying to appear town and it doesn’t come off as genuine. The whole no lynch thing was definitely some more fuel to my fire and maybe that’s why people are so hung up on that. Like I said earlier it looked like you were just throwing more dirt on rask who was already doing a good job making himself look bad and your conclusions to me don’t make sense logically. I’ve never seen anyone say no lynching is playing against their win condition. It’s not like he was going to actually gain momentum for it. Some people I’ve seen argue no lynching helps town and while I don’t agree I understand their logic. I don’t understand yours. I don’t see it coming from town unless they are a newbie which you aren’t. It’s hands down the best information available to us. Definitely better than the reasons others have given (magna for example)
How many posts have I made that involve me trying to actually discuss points and and do hunting?In post 315, Gustavo wrote:Not sure you are in the position to criticize people’s scum hunting.In post 313, Inferno390 wrote:I THINK
That it doesn’t matter because it was just an RVS vote (which more often than not is just people jacking around at the beginning anyways) and Rask obviously didn’t actually want a No Lynch anyways, so let’s all stop talking about it because it’s not helping us hunt scum.
I would 100% say this any game any alignment. (Well any normal without weird rules)In post 312, Gustavo wrote:Yes I understand all of that. But to say no lynching is against your win condition is ridiculous. (I’d use a much stronger word but you guys are too sensitive).
I refuse to believe town profli believes that. I tbink he’s scum trying to throw dirt on an easy target.
Yes. My "case" (which really isn't a case but an observation of an actual scummy post in the first 24 hours of the game) rests on that post.In post 297, davesaz wrote:@MoI re 244 -- your Flubber case seems to rest on a single post, am I reading that right?
You haven’t made that many actually. I had to start the calm discussion remember? I caught you lying, you tried to yell I caught you making more lies, you claim I was evasive, you got mad somebody stand up to you and you vote me.In post 317, Inferno390 wrote:How many posts have I made that involve me trying to actually discuss points and and do hunting?
And how many posts have you made about me complaining that I’m a liar and not actually contributing to a kind and calm discussion?
Thanks. Have a great day.
Another person with a bruised ego? I see you ignored my post that showed you are a hypocrite. For the record, there is literally nothing wrong with my posting this page or any other page.In post 319, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Yes. My "case" (which really isn't a case but an observation of an actual scummy post in the first 24 hours of the game) rests on that post.In post 297, davesaz wrote:@MoI re 244 -- your Flubber case seems to rest on a single post, am I reading that right?
Do you have an issue with that?
Also why are you still voting brass which was an RVS vote?
--
Also want to say that Gustavo has made it into my scum pool with his posting this page. His posting feels not like someone honestly looking for scum but someone bending over backwards and contorting to justify his claimed read. 310 I think embodies this best. That's not an intellectually honest statement but one meant to support his stance that profii is scum.
Have a third darkhorse read from a quick readthrough I did before dinner but will have to wait to post that read for ... reasons ...
I mean frankly while his verbiage is rather oddball the basis of profii's statement about No Lynching Day 1 stands up to reason - it is not to Town's benefit to No Lynch Day 1 regardless of the fact that a mislynch statistically is more likely to happen than a scum lynch.
In post 322, Gustavo wrote:Y’all can go ahead and lynch me. My earlier statement about the people in this game stands.
VOTE: gustavo
Don't understand this post (inferno there?) (what does the 2nd sentence mean?) (tw trolling as the wagon grows on them?)In post 108, Flubbernugget wrote:I think inferno flails by now if they're scum
I don't feel like entertaining elbrin's schtick as scum. Will entertain an inferno tunnel as scum.
I'll read the worst trolling as the wagon grows on them as town for now
I could understand a straight scumread but scumreading something like this too-town when I don't see how it'd come off towny makes me feel you read it knowing I'm townIn post 115, Skygazer wrote:Agreed. In my onion I think the first reaction test (elbirn) is fine but the second one (rask) a bit LAMIST especially considering he never really followed up on it other than his read on inferno.
VOTE: rask