You showed an unwillingness to work with me. After reading your posts I no longer believe you are town. I won’t work with scum.In post 1023, Shoshin wrote:Alright, if town has to work together, why aren't you working with me?
Have a good day
You showed an unwillingness to work with me. After reading your posts I no longer believe you are town. I won’t work with scum.In post 1023, Shoshin wrote:Alright, if town has to work together, why aren't you working with me?
Talk about not being a team player. Nauci's made a case on me. I've made a case on Keyser. Lots of people have given reasons to think the worst is likely scum. Even if shoshin's scum, there's still two more to find and tons to talk about. I'm not asking you to quit playing, I'm just not seeing your point on Shoshin's votesIn post 1019, Gustavo wrote:I’m not voting anyone else at this point
Yeah, I interpreted this as you wanting an answer to why I voted Nauci without any reason, not you wanting an answer to the question of why I voted Nauci. Maybe if you asked less aggressive, more clear questions, you'd get the answers you're looking for.In post 1022, Gustavo wrote:Here was me saying I want your reason.In post 960, Gustavo wrote:Because I want your reason.In post 959, Shoshin wrote:As you know from Tropical, I don't always state my reasons for voting. So why ask this question?In post 951, Gustavo wrote:Why did you vote nauci immediately after math did with absolutely no reason for it and hardly any mention of him prior?In post 191, Shoshin wrote:Nauci
You haven’t provided one still.
Asking you why you didn’t explain your vote wasn’t aggressive. Notice I asked everyone on that wagon who didn’t have a clear wagon the same question. The others haven’t answered but you were the one who responded with the unnecessary aggression. Not me.In post 1023, Shoshin wrote:Everything you've done from the moment you've entered this game has been needlessly aggressive towards me,
What part of his meta makes you think town? Did you peruse his town games?In post 1034, Irrelephant11 wrote:hmmm browsing gustavo's meta gets me back toward a townread, though
I just think he's wrong
I didn’t assume it was town though. The best thing to do when replacing into a game with many pages is to look at the largest current wagon. That’s going to give you the most relevant information.In post 1030, Shoshin wrote:It's curious that the first thing Gustavo does when entering the thread is ignore Stun's thoughts, look at the biggest wagon, decide the wagon is on town, and thus start questioning the votes on that player. I'm trying to picture this thought process - "Ignore thoughts of someone I know is town, assume biggest wagon in the game is on town, and thus question votes on biggest wagon" - as a town one. Struggling to see it. But input from others would be appreciated because I'm biased here.
This describes me btwIn post 1035, Irrelephant11 wrote:stungun never came across as informed, and came across pretty transparent
disagree. you "have no interest in voting nauci." (975)In post 1040, Gustavo wrote:This describes me btwIn post 1035, Irrelephant11 wrote:stungun never came across as informed, and came across pretty transparent
I developed a read based on the lack of reasons for a nauci wagon. That’s not being informed. That’s using information available to me to figure out if the wagon was a good one or not. There was very little reasoning from anyone on the wagon which to means it’s probably not on scum.In post 1042, Irrelephant11 wrote:disagree. you "have no interest in voting nauci." (975)In post 1040, Gustavo wrote:This describes me btwIn post 1035, Irrelephant11 wrote:stungun never came across as informed, and came across pretty transparent
This shows that you aren't just looking at the biggest wagon for info, you also have some sort of feeling about Nauci thatdoescome across as informed
transparent I guess though
Because my top scum read deliberately misrepresented him. I don’t see that as a s/s interaction. I see that as a s/t one.In post 1043, Irrelephant11 wrote:Also why are you so explicitly uninterested in voting the worst?
This game has too many posts with so few wagons. Cutting through the fluff seemed to be a good strategy and from my POV it’s working out pretty good even if I’ve ruffled some feathers.