OK thoughts on quotes to first 9 pages
I'll date a current 9-page-in readslist after this post and then continue reading a little more later today.
In post 22, Elbirn wrote:Aw sweet I rolled scum! That's one down guys, climb on board!
VOTE: Elbirn
Town. This is towny.
Self-votes/scumclaims are excusable in RVS.
Elbirn
is both ballsy and would be going against his wincon with this post. I feel like scum would
love
to muddy the waters over this post versus taking the intent and motive behind this post and thinking about it.
If
Elbirn
is scum, how does this help him? As town,
Elbirn
is gauging for reactions.
This is never a good thing for someone to ask on Page 3.
Believable
Why?...
OK you're towny here. Your previous post reads like a reaction test at the moment, even though your vote's on town.
In post 88, Inferno390 wrote:OMGUS
VOTE: Elbirn
This whole drive on my thoughts feels very forced.
Will explain myself further, but I’m on mobile right now.
...I hate the acronym OMGUS so much but both town and scum love to use it.
What do you think about
Elbirn
now?
In post 112, xyzzy wrote:imo Elbirn is town and just acting dumb
Raskolnikov is scum though
VOTE: Raskolnikov
also if I'm right about Raskolnikov being scum, then inferno is town. I doubt scum buddies would immediately have an interaction like that
Ehhhh....
I agree
Elbirn
is town.
I don't know what makes you conclude to
Rask
being scum that much here.
It's a completely anti-town shitty buzzword that replaces actual sentiments and reasons behind thoughts, and perpetuates the notion that trying to make others believe you're towny is an inherently scum-thing to do.
It's also a perfect utility for someone to use when they want to discredit, misrep, or emphasize their convoluted reasons behind a poorly-thought-out push.
It wouldn't be such a horrible acronym if it wasn't overused so much, because scum likes to degrade people's thinking with this buzzword and I've seen them do it a lot.
It's my least favorite buzzword, and I've played games on here in 2015.
WTF
DAVE
? WE GETTIN' SCUMREAD FOR THIS.
Dw <3 I'm confbiased so I know this is a town mistake.
In post 125, Elbirn wrote: In post 123, Skygazer wrote:"Look at me I'm so town"
I was just as confused when I first saw it.
Oh I can already tell this is my least favorite new buzzword
Elbirn
is obvtown to me. I really want to know why people didn't think this earlier, and if they don't now, I want an explanation.
In post 126, HitAlt wrote:A very stock answer/quote thrown in an attempt to look townie.
Such a basic thing to ask "then why aren't you voting?"
But it reveals, in fact, that dramonic didn't really read what was said, and went for the appearances instead.
VOTE: Dramonic
I like this post. I don't think
dramonic
thought about
Flub's
response here, but I don't really have a read on these 3 yet.
In post 130, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: Skygazer
I feel like the description of raskol's NL vote as "LAMIST" is probably the scummiest thing in the thread so far.
Ausuka
being towny.
But wait
Ausuka
, where's the wallposts and consistent engagement?
In post 138, HitAlt wrote:I've played with 9/16 players of this game before.
I have solid grasp of maybe three of those, and you are one of them.
Have you played with me before?
In post 144, Skygazer wrote:It's not the no lynch vote itself for me, it's the apparent lack of follow up to it.
I don't think a follow-up was necessary on
Rask's
NL entrance. Or at least, his inaccurate vote on this slot was plenty enough.
In post 145, profii wrote: In post 127, Ausuka wrote: In post 78, profii wrote:
Well this is worse than giving us yourself as scum, Elbirn. Wanna wagon your scum buddy here?
Why is this scummy to you?
The following post needs to be read in context of “RVS I suppose”
The self vote was bad - if you are scum, voting yourself is anti win con, if you are town, then we all have wifom over the slot because it could be a random gambit/reaction test but it certainly doesn’t help scum hunt
Then we had he no vote. Obviously excluding vigs, we can only kill scum via lynch so again, anti win con play
Admittedly - it moved us out of RVS
I think I’ll be looking at this Rask wagon in a bit for a serious vote, whilst it’s bad play, I’m not sure I’m calling it scummy. As much as I said to Elbirn lynch your scum buddy, I was more interested to see how he felt about the apparent counter reaction test, I’m assuming he Elbirn is town for trying that play (even though i don’t like it)
Egh... I get the sentiment behind the WIFOM, but I don't know why you're thinking
Elbirn
is scum and
Rask
being connected? If I read this correctly?
OK, this feels a bit genuine, but I'm going to wait a little before I make a stance.
In post 167, Inferno390 wrote:Okay, so I’m summing up three pages worth of thoughts on mobile, so bear with
Post #118: @HWS the way I see it is that based on Elbirn’s reactions her that as scum it would be an attempt to pick a 1v1 with someone and get a bunch of early town cred through that. I’ve seen plenty of games where getting into a 1v1 and bearing down on it can cause people to take it as TvT.
Post #124 is really good and Dave gets townpoints for that.
Post #130: I agree with this, especially since that by this point my use of LAMIST has been twisted from it’s original purpose. I never called the votes themselves LAMIST. (See my note on #118.) The fact that my idea is being indirectly misinterpreted pings me highly.
Post #144 makes no sense to me. How is not posting LAMIST again?
Post #145: I’m really starting to think that Profii is missing the subtleties of this RVS.
Other notes that are not necessarily tied to any posts:
Gustavo’s lack of contribution is staring to irritate me. Seems scummy.
Everyone keeps asking where Flubbernugget thinks I flailed. I haven’t flailed yet, and isn’t that kind of his point? Based on the wording, Flubbernugget is implying that I’m not scum, not that I am scum.
I don’t like how much TW is moving around without real reasons, but maybe that’s just me.
-
I don't think
Elbirn
was trying to 1v1 as much as he was getting people to interact with him. It worked.
-
You're right about
Dave
being town here, so I'm going to continue.
-
If you use
LAMIST
at all to describe your thoughts, then you should expect to be misinterpreted.
-
I like this question.
Inferno
gives me both town and iffy-vibes, overall.
In post 170, dramonic wrote:For
some
definition of not flailing.
76-80-81-88 is the least organic progression I've seen in a long time.
76 -
80 and 81 -
88
Yeah, I read through this thinking
"what is your read here again"
? I didn't quote it because I overlooked it... mostly because I couldn't get a conclusion here.
In post 172, Inferno390 wrote:
dramonic wrote:For
some
definition of not flailing.
<a href="tel:76-80-81-88" style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">76-80-81-88</a> is the least organic progression I've seen in a long time.
I’m offended
I’m sorry my train of though is too special for people who I have never played with before to understand
This is flippant.
In post 177, Flubbernugget wrote:Elbrin,
LAMIST is the cringiest acronym right before IANAL, but it's usually used more to describe what used to be called posturing than shading towntells.
I must go back to the source of these accusations and investigate
Buzzwords should all die.
Did you gain anything from this apparent investigation?
If this train of thought leads to your vote on
Dave
, then try again. I'm helping you here.
In post 192, Inferno390 wrote:AbN is Assumption Before Narrative. Basically it means that Gustavo was calling Profii’s play scummy and then coming up with reasons for it to actually be scummy.
Do it, brass.
...I swear, if there's another buzzword used here...
In post 196, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Almost 9 pages already before 24 hours are up? Do you people not understand what a chill game means?
Anyway time to move my lulz playful theworst vote to scum now that we have actual scum posting.
VOTE: Flubber
I’m disappointed none of the rest of you saw the scumminess in 180. Rask coasting as scum in the first 24 hours the game is open? And hedging on Rask ( he’s not scum for this but could be scum for this other thing ) at the same time?
On other issues ..
Theworst I’m sure will make his alignment clear to me by Day 2. He was a pretty easy read as nonTown last game. Talk of policy lynching is pretty bad in regards to him.
Neither Elb or Rask are scummy for the lulz openings but hardly obvTown either.
@Rask
- why did you try to suggest my observation about Inferno was a criticism when it was an attempt to see if others would vouch for what looked like a deliberate play style and see who responded?
Ugh... Do you have any townreads here? Do you have any townreads now? Because when I read this post, I couldn't figure it out but you're not making a lot of clarity on the people you are mentioning here.
In post 199, brassherald wrote:I think 4 scum, so dramonic, Flubbernugget, Gustavo, and HeWhoSwims.
If I am right, please confirm in the thread immediately.
Explain the thought here? At this point in the thread?
Has this evolved or changed?
In post 206, davesaz wrote:Enough time has passed that I can't be sure if it's a true memory, but I think I've incorrectly scumread Dramonic before for posting like this.
In post 210, Inferno390 wrote: In post 194, Gustavo wrote: In post 192, Inferno390 wrote:AbN is Assumption Before Narrative. Basically it means that Gustavo was calling Profii’s play scummy and then coming up with reasons for it to actually be scummy.
Do it, brass.
Have you played mafia before?
Well this is incredibly evasive. I agree with Chickadee on 186. This is pretty flaily scum.
I’m just gonna shoot you so I can go on to hunt your buddies.
Dayvig: Gustavo
I don't like that you didn't ask a question here to confirm whether your thought was correct. I've never heard of AbN used in a mafia game before.
Plus, the dayvig, even as joke, doesn't make sense here. It just sounds like you're not trying to absolve or understand suspicion on someone.
In post 224, Inferno390 wrote: In post 221, Gustavo wrote: In post 219, Inferno390 wrote:I’m done
VOTE: Gustavo
There’s not even any defense coming from him. He’s just calling me a liar and being evasive.
I’m not being invasive and I’ve called you a liar cause as I’ve shown you have lied multiple times.
I don’t have to defend myself from lies.
Where exactly have you shown anything? And asking me if I’ve ever played Mafia before in response to me explaining my point is being evasive: You’re avoiding engaging with me because you don’t like what I’m saying.
Stop being toxic and calling names, SCUM. We don’t want any of that here.
...This has led to nowhere...