In post 1011, dramonic wrote: In post 996, Inferno390 wrote:-Early game, dramonic does hardly anything to interact with the game until #604, which is the top half of page 25. So very little real hunting from him early game.
Before that point I discussed reads on you and Gus, which is basically 80% of the in-game posts by that point
Oh, yes, your two posts saying: "Gus is town because of his 1v1" and "Gus is a specific type of player that makes what he did town, so Andrius is conftown."
And notice how I said "little hunting?" Plus I address your read on Gus below, and in context, it's more of taking a position on the current topic and trying to use it to push a replace in as conftown. (Which, by the way, your conftown claim is a bit of a stretch anyways. But that's another point.)
-He refuses to explain why Gus is Town because of “chill rules,” but when I point out Gus’ major inconsistencies, his only response is “you’re gonna be disappointed with people.” Plus, in #472 he talks about Gustavo’s argument and how he has to convince himself as scum and such. What argument? There was no arguments being had. So weak case for town!Gus, especially when challenged
Pretty sure anyone except you and Hit would understand exactly what I'm saying here.
Wow. Talk about blowing people off. dramonic, I don't know what sort of playstyles you think exist, but in what world does someone COMPLETELY REVERSE ON THEIR REASONS FOR A READ?
-He provides little in terms of actual reads
I've provided reads on like half the playerlist, dunno what you're smoking
I was not aware that I, Hit, the Andrius slot, the dave slot, Duck, and flubber composed 8 people. and there's about zero detail on any of them except for davesaz.
So yeah, you've given a handful of reads with little to no reasoning behind them.
-the davesaz wagon consists mostly of “you’re not being transparent enough” and no other real points and concerns are being stated
Transparency is 95% of what makes a player town.
Wrong. Good, logical, town benefiting hunting is 95% of what makes a player town. You an be as opaque as frick and no one will give a damn if you're advancing the gamestate in a way that benefits town.
-he’s actually just sheeping the Hit wagon. He’s added no relavant content to it
Again, you haven't actually read my ISO
Yes I have. And the one post you do have explaining your sheeping is more or less parroting exactly what I said at the start of the wagon.
-he’s done a total reverse on TW with no progression or reasoning except for that he’s defending Hit, who isn’t even confirmed scum yet
Reverse based on what?
Well, at the start of the game, you make it pretty clear that you think Duck is town. When he stats defending Hit, however, you just reverse on him with no outward indication of why.
-Is passive aggressively tunneling Taly despite giving no reads on him after davesaz replaces out
It's the same playerslot. I don't care what Taly has to say.
That would be called stupidity in action. You don't just ignore what a slot says because you think that the player from before was scum. At this point it's a level of confbias that isn't even dumb anymore. It's just scummy.
-only provided original reads on davesaz. No other original content from the slot after that exchange
See above
Above where? You are parroting, sheeping and generally coasting through this game, and providing little to a town-beneficial gamestate.
-Posturing pretty hard for accusing someone of posturing and not doing anything
... do you know what posturing means?
"A particular way of behaving that is intended to convey a false impression."
Such as:
Acting like you're a town leading role when you've actually done little to push the gamestate forward
Sheeping wagons and then acting like you've got some big read on the victim
Parsing a post to make it look like you're giving logical responses when you're actually just blowing of the poster's points
