Labyrinth Mafia (Endgame)

Scioness Sajj · Post Post #3500 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:02 am

and if shoshin is scum with chick but pushing random instead of busing means chick may have a good na

Nancy Drew 39 · Post Post #3501 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:03 am

In post 3490, Wisdom wrote:this is the last time ill try
One more message that indicates you refuse to use your brain and im ignoring you for the rest of the game and blacklisting you

Reality got a communicative action on Nico.
Cshep used a communicative action on Nico.
There is no other claimed communicative action on Nico.

What are the possibilities here?
A. Someone obscured using a communicative action on Nico. That would be random, obscuring sending a message to Nico.
B. RC mistakenly included CShep's action in Reality's report despite CShep being jailed by you.

How likely is A? Not very. A message is not an implicating action. Random has no scum motivation to hide such an action, when it will just get him in trouble if an investigative caught the action (like it happened).

How likely is B? Very. RC often derps, with most recent example this very day, where he sent a result he should have sent on D1. Its easy to imagine he forgot to remove the action from the result while resolving.

Therefore, anyone with a brain understands that B is way more likely than A. It has nothing to do with my alignment, with random, or wih anyone else. Its common fucking sense.

Stop talking down to me or I will ignore all of your posts! If you want to lose the game based on your ego, that’s on you.

Wisdom · Post Post #3502 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:04 am

In post 3491, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:It’s not really similar to Ank/Mastina because they already knew the outcome.

Scioness Sajj · Post Post #3503 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:05 am

What I am trying to say is that I'm more confident in scum in {chick, random} than in chick/shoshin

Randomnamechange · Post Post #3504 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:05 am

In post 3500, Scioness Sajj wrote:and if shoshin is scum with chick but pushing random instead of busing means chick may have a good na

especially if we're dealing with a 3 person scum team which isnt impossible that seems very likely
maybe a high powered JOAT explaining the apparently legit 1 shot rolecop

Shoshin · Post Post #3505 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:06 am

In post 3495, Wisdom wrote:
In post 3492, Shoshin wrote:That's fine, Wisdom. Why can't Random be scum?
because its you and chick
No matter how many times you repeat youre achieving nothing

That's circular.

You just said it's me and Chick because it can't be Random, and it can't be Random because it's me and Chick.

Again, why can't Random be scum?

Randomnamechange · Post Post #3506 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:06 am

In post 3501, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
In post 3490, Wisdom wrote:this is the last time ill try
One more message that indicates you refuse to use your brain and im ignoring you for the rest of the game and blacklisting you

Reality got a communicative action on Nico.
Cshep used a communicative action on Nico.
There is no other claimed communicative action on Nico.

What are the possibilities here?
A. Someone obscured using a communicative action on Nico. That would be random, obscuring sending a message to Nico.
B. RC mistakenly included CShep's action in Reality's report despite CShep being jailed by you.

How likely is A? Not very. A message is not an implicating action. Random has no scum motivation to hide such an action, when it will just get him in trouble if an investigative caught the action (like it happened).

How likely is B? Very. RC often derps, with most recent example this very day, where he sent a result he should have sent on D1. Its easy to imagine he forgot to remove the action from the result while resolving.

Therefore, anyone with a brain understands that B is way more likely than A. It has nothing to do with my alignment, with random, or wih anyone else. Its common fucking sense.
Stop talking down to me or I will ignore all of your posts! If you want to lose the game based on your ego, that’s on you.

ithe thing is he is clearly right tho

Nancy Drew 39 · Post Post #3507 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:06 am

I’m willing to listen to ANYONE but Wisdom.

Wisdom · Post Post #3508 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:07 am

In post 3494, Scioness Sajj wrote:
In post 3485, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 3479, Scioness Sajj wrote:Wisdom, why don't you want to lynch chick first?
bc chick isnt shitting up the thread like shoshin is
hi wisdom

i would say that a reason for chick lynch.
going by claims it would be more beneficial to lynch now vt claim of chick than possible protective shoshin.

I dont mind
So far ive been the only person trying to lynch chick so its not me you have to convince

Randomnamechange · Post Post #3509 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:07 am

Reality got a communicative action on Nico.
Cshep used a communicative action on Nico.
There is no other claimed communicative action on Nico.

What are the possibilities here?
A. Someone obscured using a communicative action on Nico. That would be random, obscuring sending a message to Nico.
B. RC mistakenly included CShep's action in Reality's report despite CShep being jailed by you.

How likely is A? Not very. A message is not an implicating action. Random has no scum motivation to hide such an action, when it will just get him in trouble if an investigative caught the action (like it happened).

How likely is B? Very. RC often derps, with most recent example this very day, where he sent a result he should have sent on D1. Its easy to imagine he forgot to remove the action from the result while resolving.

Therefore, anyone with a brain understands that B is way more likely than A. It has nothing to do with my alignment, with random, or wih anyone else. Its common fucking sense.

Randomnamechange · Post Post #3510 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:08 am

im happy to lynch hcick today if other people are down for that

Shoshin · Post Post #3511 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:09 am

In post 3503, Scioness Sajj wrote:What I am trying to say is that I'm more confident in scum in {chick, random} than in chick/shoshin

So, are you willing to lynch Random?

What're your thoughts on Wisdom?

Wisdom · Post Post #3512 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:10 am

lol

but seriously, maybe im this bad at explaining

If someone else can make nancy see sense please do it

We need to work together here

Nancy Drew 39 · Post Post #3513 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:11 am

In post 3509, Randomnamechange wrote:Reality got a communicative action on Nico.
Cshep used a communicative action on Nico.
There is no other claimed communicative action on Nico.

What are the possibilities here?
A. Someone obscured using a communicative action on Nico. That would be random, obscuring sending a message to Nico.
B. RC mistakenly included CShep's action in Reality's report despite CShep being jailed by you.

How likely is A? Not very. A message is not an implicating action. Random has no scum motivation to hide such an action, when it will just get him in trouble if an investigative caught the action (like it happened).

How likely is B? Very. RC often derps, with most recent example this very day, where he sent a result he should have sent on D1. Its easy to imagine he forgot to remove the action from the result while resolving.

Therefore, anyone with a brain understands that B is way more likely than A. It has nothing to do with my alignment, with random, or wih anyone else. Its common fucking sense.

You are just requoting him, along with the insults. I said I want to hear from anyone other than Wisdom. I tune out insults.

Shoshin · Post Post #3514 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:12 am

VOTE: Wisdom

Nancy Drew 39 · Post Post #3515 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:13 am

In post 3512, Wisdom wrote:lol

but seriously, maybe im this bad at explaining

If someone else can make nancy see sense please do it

We need to work together here

Try not acting like a dick to me might be a good start?

Nancy Drew 39 · Post Post #3516 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:14 am

In post 3503, Scioness Sajj wrote:What I am trying to say is that I'm more confident in scum in {chick, random} than in chick/shoshin

Can you elaborate on this?

Scioness Sajj · Post Post #3517 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:20 am

In post 3511, Shoshin wrote:
In post 3503, Scioness Sajj wrote:What I am trying to say is that I'm more confident in scum in {chick, random} than in chick/shoshin
So, are you willing to lynch Random?

What're your thoughts on Wisdom?

kind of yes. i'm townreading random of his contribution d2 but right now i'm only judging base on mechanical stuff and he looks worse than chick is. still need to think if it's a direction worth taking tbh.

wisom is nullish town. he seems like a self resolving slot so i don't really bother trying to sort him now.

Shoshin · Post Post #3518 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:20 am

Reality, on D3 you said someone did something very towny on N2. You weren't referring to both the protective and communicative result. Which were you referring to?

Chickadee · Post Post #3519 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:22 am

Is it finally time to lynch Shoshin?

VOTE: Shoshin That's what I'm getting out of trying to keep up with this game. And I'm 100% here for it.

Wisdom · Post Post #3520 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:22 am

In post 3517, Scioness Sajj wrote:i'm only judging base on mechanical stuff and he looks worse than chick is.

how
One is a messenger and the other is a 1shot flavor cop who claimed a result everyone already knew
How is random possibly worse than that

Scioness Sajj · Post Post #3521 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:24 am

wait let me check if chick is actually in a hood with random or i'm confusing something

Randomnamechange · Post Post #3522 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:24 am

yep we are

Wisdom · Post Post #3523 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:25 am

dat bus tho
comes out of lurking to vote her buddy so she doesnt miss out on cred

Scioness Sajj · Post Post #3524 (ISO) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:25 am

In post 3516, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
In post 3503, Scioness Sajj wrote:What I am trying to say is that I'm more confident in scum in {chick, random} than in chick/shoshin
Can you elaborate on this?

it's mostly based on them having a hood that was started before the game, similar to wheme/reality hood.
reality/wheme hood is connected by flavor and role.
random/chick hood is connected by flavor? (if the hat chick talks about is the wiseman's hat).