wasn't that when iceman and sarge both had only one post?In post 324, nancy wrote:Not really.In post 323, OkaPoka wrote:are you this active as scum?
Why didn't you mention Flicker here?In post 140, OkaPoka wrote:odds that scum are iceman and sargealpha?
No, I'm Town.In post 329, OkaPoka wrote:are you scum
guess its kinda inconsistent with my logic but i was still going for the idea that maybe the reason why i wasnt getting any solid scumreads was because scum weren't talkingIn post 331, nancy wrote:Um.
I'm not talking about your vote. You said "flicker seems a bit defensive but nothing concrete yet", then your next post you were like, odds are the mafia team doesn't include Flicker. That doesn't make sense if you actually suspected Flicker.
also does this mean you are all caught up
Ok.In post 333, OkaPoka wrote:guess its kinda inconsistent with my logic but i was still going for the idea that maybe the reason why i wasnt getting any solid scumreads was because scum weren't talkingIn post 331, nancy wrote:Um.
I'm not talking about your vote. You said "flicker seems a bit defensive but nothing concrete yet", then your next post you were like, odds are the mafia team doesn't include Flicker. That doesn't make sense if you actually suspected Flicker.
What are Tone Reads lmaoIn post 337, Quick wrote:The votes moved from FF to Flicker and who FF and Flicker are voting for.
FF might have gotten caught early and then talked his way out of things. That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Also, Nacy's post on this page seem to have Town tone and I know Nancy to be a pretty good Town player and they are voting for Flicker. I need to look into Stan1ey's progression and vote on Flicker more, but that is where I am at atm.
How is this a sentence lmaoIn post 337, Quick wrote:That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Stuff like saying lmao for no Scum motive would be a Town tone read.In post 339, nancy wrote:What are Tone Reads lmaoIn post 337, Quick wrote:The votes moved from FF to Flicker and who FF and Flicker are voting for.
FF might have gotten caught early and then talked his way out of things. That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Also, Nacy's post on this page seem to have Town tone and I know Nancy to be a pretty good Town player and they are voting for Flicker. I need to look into Stan1ey's progression and vote on Flicker more, but that is where I am at atm.
Pls explain the FF talking his way out of things thing, thank
im stupid and i skimmed things so i was like flicker aint scum lolIn post 336, nancy wrote:This is also a thing.In post 123, OkaPoka wrote:im not really seeing flicker scum rn
Um.
What do you mean? How is it NOT a sentence?In post 340, nancy wrote:How is this a sentence lmaoIn post 337, Quick wrote:That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Not quite, VC1.02 has Oka, Ice and Trinity on me, but those are all RVS votes. VC1.03 still the same 3. 1.04 no change. 1.05 Oka and Ice change their vote and only trinity is left on.In post 337, Quick wrote:The votes moved from FF to Flicker and who FF and Flicker are voting for.
Nothing to get caught from when the votes are all hellos of sorts. I guess I am a likeable guy and have played a lot of newbie games recently so I am a player that they are going to remember and poke during rvs.FF might have gotten caught early and then talked his way out of things.
Nah dont sweat it. Heres what I see. Either my read on Flicker is wrong, and she is pushing a legit scum read in Oka, which I also happen to share, or she is scum with him and she is trying to distance herself with a fake blow up between the two and then a bus vote. Like I said, I came to a scum read on Oka dependent on my own variables. If flicker is helping achieve the goals I want to, it doesnt matter what her alignment is yet.That said, I have known him to be lynchbaitO rly? have we played together? Where have you seen me as lynchbait?, but a really good playertotally correct here, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Oh, that wasn't a question, lmaoIn post 341, Quick wrote:Stuff like saying lmao for no Scum motive would be a Town tone read.In post 339, nancy wrote:What are Tone Reads lmaoIn post 337, Quick wrote:The votes moved from FF to Flicker and who FF and Flicker are voting for.
FF might have gotten caught early and then talked his way out of things. That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Also, Nacy's post on this page seem to have Town tone and I know Nancy to be a pretty good Town player and they are voting for Flicker. I need to look into Stan1ey's progression and vote on Flicker more, but that is where I am at atm.
Pls explain the FF talking his way out of things thing, thank
I haven't read the thread, just going based on the VCs alone at this point.
You said a thing is null, then said the same thing is suspect? I can't follow your words at all. What or who is suspect? It's like you were having one thought then broke off in the middle and finished a separate thought or something lmaoIn post 343, Quick wrote:What do you mean? How is it NOT a sentence?In post 340, nancy wrote:How is this a sentence lmaoIn post 337, Quick wrote:That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Probably I'm stupidIn post 344, Quick wrote:Basically I think there's a good chance of Scum in FF and Flicker, don't know why that is difficult to understand.