Newbie 1881 - Game Over

[Quick]

yeah this is def a stunt i'd pulled only to be forced to reread the game later
question is will quick actually reread the game

@quick how much do you stick to your morals

Not very well, unfortunately, because I have zero self-disipline.

[nancy]

uh trinity's recent post don't seem to disprove my theory tho

Lmao this is certainly a wording

[nancy]

yeah this is def a stunt i'd pulled only to be forced to reread the game later
question is will quick actually reread the game

@quick how much do you stick to your morals

Not very well, unfortunately, because I have zero self-disipline.

Can attest.

I'm going to stop spamming the game for a while.

Bye!

[Quick]

Quick, read game pls thx

Don't really want to. I usually don't even replace into games with 200+ posts, so you're lucky to have me as it is.

You're... joking... right?

Halfway joking, yeah.

Please add the other half of the way, thank

The serious part is that I don't usually replace into games with more than 200 posts.

Quick, read game pls thx

Don't really want to. I usually don't even replace into games with 200+ posts, so you're lucky to have me as it is.

We can lynch this too.

Try it. I'm Town this game so I'm not getting lynched.

Nah, im too busy trying to get Oka lynched, you should come over there with me. Or maybe retract what you said about me as a player since you mixed me up with someone else. Very ironic, or maybe not that song really fucked things up for me, that the topic you link to your next post apologizes for not knowing names. Its fitting.

I thought that would be implied that since I mixed you up with someone that that read is forgone as it is associated with the wrong person, but still holds it's weight in terms of what's likely regarding your slot. Just makes the reads less concrete and more open to interpretation.

[Micc]

Votecount 1.07

Flicker (3) -

nancy, Stan1ey, Quick

OkaPoka (2) -

Flicker, Formerfish

Formerfish (1) -

TrinityNZ

TrinityNZ (1) -

OkaPoka

Not Voting (2) -

Eragon, IcemanCh

With 9 players alive it takes 5 votes to lynch.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2018-07-23 11:49:57).

[Formerfish]

But without reading the game you lack the context that would lend any sort of creadence to what you have to say. Looking at vote counts from early day 1 isn't going to tell much, and when you don't know why people voted for who they did you can't begin to understand the game state as is.

[Quick]

But without reading the game you lack the context that would lend any sort of creadence to what you have to say. Looking at vote counts from early day 1 isn't going to tell much, and when you don't know why people voted for who they did you can't begin to understand the game state as is.

Yeah, that's true, but this is not the only game I am involved in and I have other stuff going on so I don't have time to read everything atm.

[TrinityNZ]

Basically I think there's a good chance of Scum in FF and Flicker, don't know why that is difficult to understand.

Yes, finally, someone else seeing scum in FF.

[nancy]

Basically I think there's a good chance of Scum in FF and Flicker, don't know why that is difficult to understand.

Yes, finally, someone else seeing scum in FF.

eyes emoji

[OkaPoka]

yeah this is def a stunt i'd pulled only to be forced to reread the game later
question is will quick actually reread the game

@quick how much do you stick to your morals

Not very well, unfortunately, because I have zero self-disipline.

well does that mean you will go back on your word saying you wont catch up if you become a viable lynch?

uh trinity's recent post don't seem to disprove my theory tho

Lmao this is certainly a wording

trinity's recent postings do not seem to disprove my theory that trinity is not being proactive and trying to actively engage with others*

[nancy]

I knew what you were saying, lmao

I just thought it was interesting that you called your read a theory

[OkaPoka]

k just gotta make sure a lot of times what i say doesn't come out clear because i just type without editing half the time and i never proofread

[TrinityNZ]

yeah this is def a stunt i'd pulled only to be forced to reread the game later
question is will quick actually reread the game

@quick how much do you stick to your morals

Not very well, unfortunately, because I have zero self-disipline.

well does that mean you will go back on your word saying you wont catch up if you become a viable lynch?

uh trinity's recent post don't seem to disprove my theory tho

Lmao this is certainly a wording

trinity's recent postings do not seem to disprove my theory that trinity is not being proactive and trying to actively engage with others*

OkaPoka, your trying hard to make me look bad says more about you than me. What do you think about that?

[OkaPoka]

yeah this is def a stunt i'd pulled only to be forced to reread the game later
question is will quick actually reread the game

@quick how much do you stick to your morals

Not very well, unfortunately, because I have zero self-disipline.

well does that mean you will go back on your word saying you wont catch up if you become a viable lynch?

uh trinity's recent post don't seem to disprove my theory tho

Lmao this is certainly a wording

trinity's recent postings do not seem to disprove my theory that trinity is not being proactive and trying to actively engage with others*

OkaPoka, your trying hard to make me look bad says more about you than me. What do you think about that?

clarify?
i think that you made an interesting question but i really don't know what direction you are taking this

[OkaPoka]

i feel like you said something badass but i don't get it

[OkaPoka]

do you want me to evaluate my scumminess based on me scumreading you?

[TrinityNZ]

do you want me to evaluate my scumminess based on me scumreading you?

Lol, I guess what I was saying was that, is what you were saying really true? Or are you just trying to throw shade on me to take the heat off you?

[OkaPoka]

Pretty sure I believe what I'm saying.

I'm throwing shade on you cuz I isod you.after abandoning Iceman case, think I found a decent scum chance here, hoping it would gain traction and yeah I guess I don't want to be lynched, but does anyone? As for the heat, I mean interacting directly.with others is the easiest way to develop reads on them for me

[TrinityNZ]

Pretty sure I believe what I'm saying.

I'm throwing shade on you cuz I isod you.after abandoning Iceman case, think I found a decent scum chance here, hoping it would gain traction and yeah I guess I don't want to be lynched, but does anyone? As for the heat, I mean interacting directly.with others is the easiest way to develop reads on them for me

OK but you’re going down the wrong track with me, you should be directing your energies to someone who actually looks like scum. That’s why you’re looking a bit suspicious

[nancy]

Uhm. I don't understand this approach from you at all Trinity. What.

[TrinityNZ]

Uhm. I don't understand this approach from you at all Trinity. What.

i guess I’m just not understanding why OkaPoka is scum reading me, I don’t think I’ve given any reasons for it. I’m suggesting that we instead look for the actual scum.

[nancy]

Okay but you can't just say that someone's reasoning for scumreading you is scummy just because you don't agree with it.

[nancy]

Pretty sure I believe what I'm saying.

Oka you are a very strange creature lmao.

[nancy]

Uhm. I don't understand this approach from you at all Trinity. What.

i guess I’m just not understanding why OkaPoka is scum reading me, I don’t think I’ve given any reasons for it. I’m suggesting that we instead look for the actual scum.

Okay let's start here. What part about his scumread on you do you not understand?

[TrinityNZ]

yeah this is def a stunt i'd pulled only to be forced to reread the game later
question is will quick actually reread the game

@quick how much do you stick to your morals

Not very well, unfortunately, because I have zero self-disipline.

well does that mean you will go back on your word saying you wont catch up if you become a viable lynch?

uh trinity's recent post don't seem to disprove my theory tho

Lmao this is certainly a wording

trinity's recent postings do not seem to disprove my theory that trinity is not being proactive and trying to actively engage with others*

Nancy, in this posts oka said I’m not being proactive and I’m not trying to engage with others. I don’t think this is true.