I don't understand what's ridiculous.In post 3924, Tchill13 wrote:In post 3915, Scioness Sajj wrote:Based on how clueless she is I think Lalendra might be town. I don't think she is faking that.I mean it's actually ridiculous.In post 3918, Kublai Khan wrote:The thing I hate is the timing of the cluelessness.In post 3915, Scioness Sajj wrote:Based on how clueless she is I think Lalendra might be town. I don't think she is faking that.
If lalendra is actually town here she bought herself a ticket to lylo with that. Oon top of being a mislynch candidate for scum she's actually clueless.
IF lalendra is scum, she is, then the cluelessness is AtE. I've never seen lalendra show great skills at fighting off her lynch. I can see her as scum saying "she won't fight" then acting like she has no clue whats going on the game. Thats what you do when you dont know how to methodically defend yourself.
Every lurker town, clueless or with bad reads or just a lurker, gets themselves a ticket to lylo, if you want to put it that way. I don't know why you seem so outraged by the fact that lurkers are usually disengaged and thus outliving engaged townies.
Wouldn't call it ate. Imo, if she isn't good at defending herself then she is less likely to try to defend herself by showing how little she knows about the game while trying to provide content. Right now, town or scum she is good policy lynch. I think if you don't know how to methodically defend yourself and you try to go clueless route you try for flat out clueless. She provided content about Ausuka based on meta and 'decided' to forgot about Ausuka's confirmed status. It's not intuitive to make lies like that. The purpose of first part, providing meta content on Ausuka, gets nullified by the second part, forgetting about IC role. Doing something like that isn't really basic defense.
If she is generally bad at defending herself I highly doubt she would try to defend herself like that. She can be scum and she can be clueless but i doubt something like this would be intentional.