i do. i believe i have been pretty clear how i feel about her, it didn't change since yesterday.In post 4019, wavemode wrote:so you townread lalendra?
actually, i take that back. that's scummy approach.In post 4020, texcat wrote:Why?In post 4018, Scioness Sajj wrote:that's terrible approachIn post 4003, wavemode wrote:do we want lalendra anywhere near lylo
why? there is a difference between i vote for you because i think you are scum and i vote you because i don't trust you to win the game in lylo.
do you play to lynch scum or do you play to policy people that may make the wrong decision in lylo? do you want a lynch that people have to take stances on or do you want to have no responsibility policy? are you certain that disengaged lurkers will stay disengaged? are you certain that engaged players won't flake out?
idk maybe i'm wrong but i thought we should be looking for scum, not weakest links. especially in a game like this where, if we assume i'm upper line of useless lurker, we have about 10 players that fit criterium of being a liability to our wincon. you and wave included.