In post 965, Porkens wrote:In post 117, Antihero wrote:DUEL ME SCRUBIn post 41, Spiffeh wrote:I bet Antihero rolled scum this gameDUEL ANTIHERO
Let’s be real: if I were scum, it would be much more likely that I would’ve started a duel by this point. That aside, you haven’t explained why you suspect me in any way.In post 972, Porkens wrote:You are firm irch town ya?
TINSTAAFL is totally irrelevant here.In post 986, Porkens wrote:There is no such thing as a free lunch. You are fooling yourself.
I dueld antihero.
Spiffy, i hear your ask.
What? Why?In post 1100, Fundamental Theorem wrote:Oh hi scum! Please auto-lynch this (i.e.: vote for antihero or neither).In post 965, Porkens wrote:In post 117, Antihero wrote:DUEL ME SCRUBIn post 41, Spiffeh wrote:I bet Antihero rolled scum this gameDUEL ANTIHERO
VOTE: Antihero
If you truly wanted scrap from Antihero so bad, you could’ve at least waited until after I did my duel and used my ability before you fueled. There would probably still be people who hated you for it, but at the very least, you would have a chance of winning this duel.In post 999, Porkens wrote:I did, and I bet on my ability to convince you that it's preferable to let me eat antihero than losing your goldenboy
He's just following up on what he said he would do earlier. He claimed he could duel without it ending the day. Letting him do so is theoretically town-positive.In post 1104, Prof Fridays wrote:What? Why?In post 1100, Fundamental Theorem wrote:Oh hi scum! Please auto-lynch this (i.e.: vote for antihero or neither).In post 965, Porkens wrote:In post 117, Antihero wrote:DUEL ME SCRUBIn post 41, Spiffeh wrote:I bet Antihero rolled scum this gameDUEL ANTIHERO
VOTE: Antihero
I thought scrap abilities were hidden?In post 1045, Spiffeh wrote:The bottom line is that no scum player would random duel today after all the shit Firebringer got for it last Day
While it was an extremely suboptimal move for Porkens to have done this as town, the fact that they keep soft claiming some role needing scrap makes it pretty obvious that they had some PURPOSE for the move as town.
The fact that UnrealSeal is painting scum motivation into this move is pretty ridiculous and sketchy af
Yesterday's was policy but that doesn't seem to have worked so here we are.In post 1107, Prof Fridays wrote:Ah true, Papa Zito, though I would not care for lynching him on policy today.
Spiffeh, aside from the audacity of the duel, why do you think Porkens is town here?In post 1067, Spiffeh wrote:If people are going to keep voting in favor of killing the obvious town player I'm probably just gonna stop posting and pray that I get night killed
It would be one thing if Porkens did this and Anti was contributing in a way I expect town!him to be contributing, but Anti has done next to nothing and Porkens has basically claimed a power role and again, would DEFINITELY not have dueled in this manner as scum.
But isn’t that a WIFOM argument?In post 1076, Prof Fridays wrote:Examining the motivations for dueling seems like it leads you invariably toward a town read on Porkens.
I think it did sound like a 3rd party claim: he said he needed it before someone else got it. That sounds like a 3rd party win condition to me.In post 1088, Spiffeh wrote:LLD why can't it be a town role?
(He said there is competition from <redacted>)In post 1112, Fundamental Theorem wrote:I think it did sound like a 3rd party claim: he said he needed it before someone else got it. That sounds like a 3rd party win condition to me.In post 1088, Spiffeh wrote:LLD why can't it be a town role?
(Unless someone gives a good answer to this, I think voting Neither is the way to go because tbqh, I don’t townread Antihero, but I don’t townread Porkens either and think the fact that he fueled to be a bit too WIFOM-y for my tastes.)In post 1110, Fundamental Theorem wrote:Spiffeh, aside from the audacity of the duel, why do you think Porkens is town here?In post 1067, Spiffeh wrote:If people are going to keep voting in favor of killing the obvious town player I'm probably just gonna stop posting and pray that I get night killed
It would be one thing if Porkens did this and Anti was contributing in a way I expect town!him to be contributing, but Anti has done next to nothing and Porkens has basically claimed a power role and again, would DEFINITELY not have dueled in this manner as scum.
NO.In post 1114, Fundamental Theorem wrote:(Unless someone gives a good answer to this, I think voting Neither is the way to go because tbqh, I don’t townread Antihero, but I don’t townread Porkens either and think the fact that he fueled to be a bit too WIFOM-y for my tastes.)In post 1110, Fundamental Theorem wrote:Spiffeh, aside from the audacity of the duel, why do you think Porkens is town here?In post 1067, Spiffeh wrote:If people are going to keep voting in favor of killing the obvious town player I'm probably just gonna stop posting and pray that I get night killed
It would be one thing if Porkens did this and Anti was contributing in a way I expect town!him to be contributing, but Anti has done next to nothing and Porkens has basically claimed a power role and again, would DEFINITELY not have dueled in this manner as scum.
VOTE: neither
Not a true WIFOM, no (a true WIFOM being 50/50). You could say it's 70/30 WIFOM in favor of town. I mean, many arguments are WIFOM with varying probabilities. In this case we're dealing with more than just two men and two glasses of wine.In post 1111, Fundamental Theorem wrote:But isn’t that a WIFOM argument?In post 1076, Prof Fridays wrote:Examining the motivations for dueling seems like it leads you invariably toward a town read on Porkens.
also, antihero comes out looking better at first sight here given fb’s town flip, contingent on porkens true motive for joining the neither wagon.In post 824, SpyreX wrote:Official Duel Count
neither (14): Gammagooey, RadiantCowbells, Firebringer, rb, UnrealSeal, Fundamental Theorem, the worst, Skygazer, Gamma Emerald,Porkens, Papa Zito, Creature, stungun0404, Brian Skies
Katsuki (4): MariaR, Katsuki, BlueBloodedToffee, Fate
Firebringer (4): Toogeloo, Spiffeh,Antihero, Garmr
Not Voting(6): Vecna, Princess Celestia, Lady Lambdadelta, dramonic, neither, Prof Fridays
With 27 alive, it takes 14 to lynch.
NEITHER WINS. Please Hold.
im beginning to think that punishment cant prevent stupidityIn post 1035, Gammagooey wrote:if porkens doesn't face some consequence for his stupid fucking shit then some other douchebag will just fuck us over again tomorrow b/c they think they can get away with it too
a full claim from him is the lightest thing we can possibly ask for