Null
(0% - 30% Confidence; No/Very Weak Read)
Antihero (+15%) : I like
280 (from an alignment-determining standpoint.)
Dramonic (+5%) : Haven't really done much this game, but I agree with their Seal scumread (as in the scumread itself, not the reasons which weren't really given except an associative tell.)
The Worst (+3%) : I can believe they originally thought they were a mafia traitor at first, but I'm not 100% convinced this is town yet.
Gamma Emerald (+2%) : The 180 in
1079 is pretty bad imo, but the rest of the ISO seems pretty nullish/semi-decent.
Papa Zito (-15%) : I don't really like
1099, and I find
1147 a little suspicious, but I'm not convinced either is alignment-indicative.
Neutral
(31%-59% Confidence; Mixed Read)
Skygazer (+49%) : They left a pretty good early impression. That said, I'm not sure what to think about
476 and
480.
488 seems bad, but I'm actually kinda inclined to lean towards town for that particular post.
527 is just bad as it tries to assign motivation to the ordering when said motivation likely doesn't exist. I did like their posts at the start of day 2.
Lady Lambdadelta (+44%) : Despite being completely absent day 1, I've liked their contributions for day 2 in terms of their alignment. For instance,
1007 registers as a town post to me (though I know that Lambdadelta is known for using a great degree of AtE.)
1020 and
1050 have a town!vibe as well.
Spiffeh (+40%) : Eh, they seem town for the time being. I'm inclined to townread them somewhat for their argument that Porkens is town because scum wouldn't duel, even if I don't really agree with the logic 100%.
Garmr (+35%) : Their posts in general have been pretty good.
Brian Skies (-31%) : I really dislike their
79 where they ask us to ignore a vote of theirs because it was simply done to be aggravating.
471 really pings, but I'm not sure why. Their comment in
1082 (and a similar comment or two later on) also didn't really sound like town. There was also the fact that they were really pressing to be a sacrifice in a duel with me at the start of day 2--it's odd to say the least, but makes me lean towards town (with respects to that). I'm still getting an overall scum-feel here.
rb (-35%) : Their posts in general just ping me, though it may just be me disagreeing with their initial reads (and then tunneling them to an extent).
Porkens (-38%) : I don't like how they spend a bunch of their first few posts just quoting stuff and calling it scum, but that may just be a playstyle issue. Also, how does my
107 make me scum? I'm also really annoyed by the sheer anti-town nature of their duel day 2, but I'm not naive enough to assume it *must* come from scum.
Stungun0404 (-43%) : There seems to be quite a few IIoA posts in this ISO. For instance,
64 (about being familiar with Creature's meta) and
100 (setup spec about the number of scum) are examples of IIoA. I also have a serious issue with their reads in
611. And I dislike
620 as well... (Their day 2 posts seem a bit better, but meh...)
MariaR (-44%) : I really dislike
377. While I don't want to resurrect that argument, MariaR's behavior on page 18 or so pinged me as well. The fact that MariaR in
675 says Katsuki's behavior is not scum-indicative doesn't really say much about Katsuki's alignment. In particular, with the way MariaR is defending Katsuki, I would think they would (as town) point out how Katsuki is town this game, not how they aren't necessarily scum. Their day 2 posts don't really seem that much better.
Prof Fridays (-45%) :
1039 really rubs me the wrong way.
1059 does as well--I think it's the apathetic feel to the comment that gives me scum!feels.
1076 really sounds like scum that *knows* Porkens is town.
Toogeloo (-47%) : Their posts in general strike a scum!chord to me. The thing that seems to stick out about their posts is that they seem to be LAMIST in nature. For instance,
322 has that LAMIST feel.
330 has that feel as well. (Note: While nothing has really changed my mind about this slot, the confidence rating dropped significantly because I think I may have been biasing myself too much against them.)
Gammagooey (-49%) : Their day 1 contributions were minimal.
960 feels off in a way. I'm also not sure what to think about the continued reference to Dynasty Warriors, but I have to admit, I'd probably lean towards town on that aspect.
1001 gives scum!vibes as well.
1012 is objectively bad play. I also don't see what about Porken's claim makes Gammagooey 180 in
1089.
Leaning Scum
(60%-75% Confidence)
UnrealSeal (-70%) : I have many issues with this ISO. For instance,
18 is an objectively bad post and feels like scum!Seal trying to pocket and/or buddy Creature. (This is regardless of the fact that it was an exaggeration.)
31 pings me as well. I don't really like
176 because saying someone pings due to asking for a speedlynch sounds much more like a policy reason than a legitimate scumping. Apparently, it doesn't take long for their pings to turn into a full-fledged scumread in
192, but that doesn't mean the reasoning really got any better. Their defense of Katsuki in posts like
281 strikes me as being too forceful/aggressive.
302 is really bad when you consider other posts they have made (like
281). Then we also have posts like
467 (bad logic; get the feeling that Unreal is purposely trying to paint this a certain way) and
469 (where they admit they aren't interested in sorting...) As far as day 2 goes, their ISO really hasn't improved that much. Lady Lamdadelta brought up some decent points against them.
