NY 213 - Game Over!

Dunnstral · Post Post #4500 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:10 pm

I mean, from my point of view lalendra wagon flared after texcat wagon formed

Tchill13 · Post Post #4501 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:10 pm

In post 4497, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4495, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 4469, Dunnstral wrote:If you want me off of texcat you're going to have to explain why they're town
there's more than 1 scum in the game. there's probably more than 3 scum in the game atm. Just because you can't explain why someone is town doesn't mean they're scum.
I mean, that seems as good a place as any to start lynching for scum, no?

What makes tex stand out to you individually above the rest? your own words please.

From my pov why should I vote tex over you?

Tchill13 · Post Post #4502 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:10 pm

how many votes did tex get?

Tchill13 · Post Post #4503 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:13 pm

In post 4488, Krazy wrote:what

we have 24 hours until this day cycle ends and you're going hardlurk?

In post 4490, Ankamius wrote:
In post 4488, Krazy wrote:what

we have 24 hours until this day cycle ends and you're going hardlurk?
Yup

"I don't want any credibility for this flip!!!"

Dunnstral · Post Post #4504 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:15 pm

In post 4502, Tchill13 wrote:how many votes did tex get?

Like 5-6, it was definitely the top wagon

Tchill13 · Post Post #4505 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:15 pm

If town refuses to vote lalendra after her absent mindedness and how she handled the wheme lynch then idk what else to tell yall.

Hop and flavor consistently have good reads as town. I also have a decent percentage of correctly reading lalendra. I SR her, they SR her.

She's probably scum here.

Tchill13 · Post Post #4506 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:17 pm

In post 4504, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4502, Tchill13 wrote:how many votes did tex get?
Like 5-6, it was definitely the top wagon

whats your opinion on the fact the wagon after tex was countered 3ish times? At least was met with a lot of vanity wagons.

Wouldn't the wagon after scum, with so many scum in the game that need a town lynch today, probably go through if it were on town?

Tchill13 · Post Post #4507 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:20 pm

In post 3209, WhemeStar wrote:1 more hour

In post 3213, WhemeStar wrote:Anyone here

I wanna talk after I claim

In post 3216, WhemeStar wrote:Hi

Im town doctor

Targeted Hopkirk N1

In post 3219, WhemeStar wrote:I thought scum wouldnt kill the IC N1 because of protective and thought that they wouldnt kill creature cause hes not doing anything so targeted hopkirk

Like, he's practically confirmed scum after that last post. Now i read it with the knowledge that he had flipped scum BUT i would imagine in real time (I read 119 through here) it was painfully obvious.

Tchill13 · Post Post #4508 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:23 pm

In post 3242, Dunnstral wrote:What's wrong with you guys? I don't remember wheme being so scummy that we ignore good strategy and just lynch him through a doctor claim, I was under the impression that this was basically a lurker/lynchbait day.

Wheme isn't scummy around hammer, why would mafia claim dumb protect targets

If Wheme is mafia he gets caught later and we lynch him over any other doc claim if it comes to it

If we lynch doctor we lose our way to protect all these mason/ic that prematurely claimed (more bad town play but nothing I could do about it)

VOTE: PenguinPower

In post 3248, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: tehbrawlguy

We can try

In post 3255, Scioness Sajj wrote:VOTE: penguinpower
Don't scumread tbg, nor do I want another claim.

Will switched if needed.

In post 3284, Golden Robster wrote:UNVOTE: Wheme

In post 3285, Golden Robster wrote:if wheme flips town you hardlynch PP with me

In post 3286, Golden Robster wrote:VOTE: whemestar

In post 3290, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: penguin power

ladies and gentleman. There are the "stallers" there's at least 1 if not 2 scum there. All after the obvious doc fake claim.

Dunnstral · Post Post #4509 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:24 pm

In post 4506, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 4504, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4502, Tchill13 wrote:how many votes did tex get?
Like 5-6, it was definitely the top wagon
whats your opinion on the fact the wagon after tex was countered 3ish times? At least was met with a lot of vanity wagons.

Wouldn't the wagon after scum, with so many scum in the game that need a town lynch today, probably go through if it were on town?

Don't know what you're asking

Tchill13 · Post Post #4510 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:24 pm

im counting Rob because he goes out of his way to point out he thinks wheme may flip town. If you have any thought that the claimed doctor flips town in what world do you vote him?

Tchill13 · Post Post #4511 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:25 pm

@dunn lets move on. Why Texcat over PP or TBG today? When the fake doc claim happened you voted those players. Why no push this day phase?

Tchill13 · Post Post #4512 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:29 pm

In post 3039, Flavor Leaf wrote:The fact that Wheme, Lalendra, and Mylo are on PP also points towards PP town. They’re either scum joining on, or town that is being used a scum sheep votes for scum.

Wheme likely has the worst ISO in this game, to be honest. We had Wave, who I think is town, alongside the masons and Penguin being the only ones on the Wheme wagon initially when PP was picking up steam.

lalendra and mylo are either sheeping scum or are scum here early. I agree 100 percent with this.

Dunnstral · Post Post #4513 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:33 pm

In post 4511, Tchill13 wrote:@dunn lets move on. Why Texcat over PP or TBG today? When the fake doc claim happened you voted those players. Why no push this day phase?

PP looks like the counter wagon and no I don't remember voting him

TBG was on the scum wagon so I'm not interested in voting him, also it looked like the only non-pp alternative to yesterday

Tchill13 · Post Post #4514 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:34 pm

In post 2823, Lalendra wrote:
In post 2820, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 2818, Lalendra wrote:Also the Hopkirk claim was underwhelming, I'm glad he claimed but I was already townreading him so I was hoping it would be some other slot that would give me more info. I guess at least now I don't have to worry about wavering on that slot later.
Yet you all forced the second mason to claim. There was literally no reason for it.

It would have EASILY been confirmed in a day or two. Never do that again.
We have yet to see whether it's a good or bad thing for town.

In post 2840, Lalendra wrote:
In post 2836, Flavor Leaf wrote:confirmed conf town

In post 2852, Lalendra wrote:
In post 2841, Flavor Leaf wrote:I was already conf town before. Now I’m confirmed conf town.
I...what

In post 2985, Lalendra wrote:
In post 2904, Scioness Sajj wrote:town: flavor/hopkirk, kk, jarjar, etl (from d1, needs updating).
town???: mylo13, gamma, golden robster, penguinpower,
null: and everybody i forgot about
scum???: texcat, lalendra? (i can't tell how much of it it's peculiar posting style and how much is weird motions), andriod, wave (not really in lynchable pile, but doesn't fit anywhere else).

there is no 'scum' because this is based on pages 100-116 +what i remember thinking of slots from d1. i'd put andriod in scums since nobody is willing to explain their townread on it but it will do just fine in

VOTE: andriod18
Wait. So you don't have any scumreads, and your readslist is admittedly missing half the players, so you're arbitrarily deciding android is scum because other people TR him and haven't explained it well enough? That's...odd, at best.

In post 3097, Lalendra wrote:VOTE: Whemestar

I fail to see the reason for the wheme vote.

Krazy · Post Post #4515 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:36 pm

Alright, finally Tchill is here. LOL I was starting to wonder if your meta just flips out in large normals or if you were just getting caught up.

Tchill13 · Post Post #4516 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:36 pm

apparently there was a group that made the other mason claim???

If a player met the mason claim with either hesitation or forced the other mason to claim...

and they also either stalled the wagon or looked like they bussed...

they need to be lynched. Now can someone please tell me who forced the other mason to claim? all ik is lalendra was a part of that due to flavors iso.

Tchill13 · Post Post #4517 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:38 pm

In post 4515, Krazy wrote:Alright, finally Tchill is here. LOL I was starting to wonder if your meta just flips out in large normals or if you were just getting caught up.

hopefully you've read multiple games of mine.

First large in a bit but i'll be in the large normals from now on for a long time. Meta probably wont change for a bit until i get used to large normals.

Tchill13 · Post Post #4518 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:39 pm

In post 4513, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4511, Tchill13 wrote:@dunn lets move on. Why Texcat over PP or TBG today? When the fake doc claim happened you voted those players. Why no push this day phase?
PP looks like the counter wagon and no I don't remember voting him

TBG was on the scum wagon so I'm not interested in voting him, also it looked like the only non-pp alternative to yesterday

so you'd rather lynch womeone who stalled the wagon than manybe someone who bussed? Did Texcat look like he stalled more so than the others i just listed? Brawler, Scionness...

Tchill13 · Post Post #4519 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:40 pm

even vax?

Dunnstral · Post Post #4520 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:41 pm

In post 2696, Dunnstral wrote:Mason partner doesn't claim today

There's no reason why we have to go after flavor leaf today, if he were lying we'd figure it out eventually and he wouldn't get away

Same thing I did with Wheme's doctor claim

Tchill13 · Post Post #4521 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:44 pm

In post 4520, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 2696, Dunnstral wrote:Mason partner doesn't claim today

There's no reason why we have to go after flavor leaf today, if he were lying we'd figure it out eventually and he wouldn't get away
Same thing I did with Wheme's doctor claim

the issue is it looks like your scrambling with the multiple votes. PP was a bad vote imo. TBG as well AT THE TIME.

Had you voted Tex there your play would have more credibility.

I would also imagine the mason claim was in a much more believable manner than the doc claim.

Dunnstral · Post Post #4522 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:45 pm

I didn't vote pp to m yknowledge

Dunnstral · Post Post #4523 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:46 pm

In post 4518, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 4513, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4511, Tchill13 wrote:@dunn lets move on. Why Texcat over PP or TBG today? When the fake doc claim happened you voted those players. Why no push this day phase?
PP looks like the counter wagon and no I don't remember voting him

TBG was on the scum wagon so I'm not interested in voting him, also it looked like the only non-pp alternative to yesterday
so you'd rather lynch womeone who stalled the wagon than manybe someone who bussed? Did Texcat look like he stalled more so than the others i just listed? Brawler, Scionness...

I'm voting Texcat because I feel like they are scummy

Stalling isn't scummy because they still get lynched in the end

Tchill13 · Post Post #4524 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:49 pm

In post 3242, Dunnstral wrote:What's wrong with you guys? I don't remember wheme being so scummy that we ignore good strategy and just lynch him through a doctor claim, I was under the impression that this was basically a lurker/lynchbait day.

Wheme isn't scummy around hammer, why would mafia claim dumb protect targets

If Wheme is mafia he gets caught later and we lynch him over any other doc claim if it comes to it

If we lynch doctor we lose our way to protect all these mason/ic that prematurely claimed (more bad town play but nothing I could do about it)

VOTE: PenguinPower

you vote PP right here.