In post 2549, the worst wrote:oofIn post 2548, Pine wrote:Nursing their beer (Not voting) - HeWhoSwims
sorry flashwagon pals
VOTE: HWS
Never mind, see below.
In post 2549, the worst wrote:oofIn post 2548, Pine wrote:Nursing their beer (Not voting) - HeWhoSwims
sorry flashwagon pals
VOTE: HWS
So, not only have you:
Where'sIn post 2550, Pine wrote:In post 2549, the worst wrote:oofIn post 2548, Pine wrote:Nursing their beer (Not voting) - HeWhoSwims
sorry flashwagon pals
VOTE: HWSModerator error, actually. HWS is on Gamma Emerald.
In post 2552, Taly wrote:Where'sIn post 2550, Pine wrote:In post 2549, the worst wrote:oofIn post 2548, Pine wrote:Nursing their beer (Not voting) - HeWhoSwims
sorry flashwagon pals
VOTE: HWSModerator error, actually. HWS is on Gamma Emerald.HWSvote onGE? I didn't see it
Yeah, I quotedIn post 2465, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Of all the things Xyzzy’s recently dropped this is the one that I think is the most troubling. It shows no acknowledgement of the game-state and the fact that forcing a suspected Serial Killer to shoot into the ever shrinking pool of PoE suspects is very powerful for Town. I don’t see this as a Town perspective.In post 2426, xyzzy wrote:I really can't agree with Andrius' "If you shoot someone unacceptable we'll lynch you" in 2343. while it's generally a good idea for a vigilante to give a shit about what the town wants, it seems like being a populist and just shooting the most scumread player every night is a good way for an SK to skate by.
Taly– Do you disagree?
Deadline was extended by 3 days.In post 2548, Pine wrote:Deadline in 3 days, 6 hours, 14 minutes
If it's so clear that you want a certain persons lynch, then why don't you vote and case for that?In post 2560, HeWhoSwims wrote:Look through my games... I'm just someone who doesn't move votes a lot ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ regardless of alignment. Plus I'm not a fan of all of the proposed lynches - I have made it clear who I am interested in at this point and voting there by myself isn't going to help me at all.
In post 2380, Chickadee wrote:I'm more inclined to lynch profii than xyzzy.
What happened to an A50 lynch?
While these seem like the last posts of her to contain reads stuff. Plus a lot of one liner stuff.In post 2280, Chickadee wrote:Inferno, your magna vote is opportunistic as all hell.
Did I go on the hit vote? I thought he is town pretty much the whole way - I said I thought it was boon which, soft or messing is his thing which was the general exception from everyone elseIn post 2551, Taly wrote:So, not only have you:
1)Pushed an understated associative case againstMe/Skywithout engaging with my case onA50in depth, AFTER you L-1'd him.{Most of your first-half D2 ISO}
2)Kept your vote onFlubmost of D1 and alternated from him to theHit/Xyzzywagon despite repeatedly saying you want to voteDrambut scumread the people on his wagon.{Read my ISO where I said xyzzy/profii are UNLIKELY to be scum together}
3)Avoided a good bit of my questions and thoughts in my walls toward you in favor of saying deflective statements like"Don't tell me how to play"when I'm trying to understand your POV. 2406
4)Proceed to OFFER yourself to be lynched OR use up a Town-Vig's shot if it meant sealing the fate of another person, who you DEFENDED as a townread in your case against me.{A50}2477
5)You L-1'dxyzzythe MOMENT you got traction on your wagon, despite you saying you were going to reevaluateHWS. 2541
VOTE: profii
I'm done postponing my vote here. I can no longer rationalize how this is town.
I no longer feel good about thexyzzylynch with several people's votes there.
I can still be swayed back ontoHWSbecause I'd love to see his flip alongsideprofii.
I still wantMOIto sell me onSkybeing the best option today, he and I are the only people that have actually entertainedSky-scum in depth this dayphase despite her off-putting D1 performance and vote history... so I'm worried there.