hey look i said i wouldn't make a quotewall but i'm doing it anyway because i'm a masochist I guess??? whee
In post 115, Skygazer wrote:Agreed. In my onion I think the first reaction test (elbirn) is fine but the second one (rask) a bit LAMIST especially considering he never really followed up on it other than his read on inferno.
VOTE: rask
This is just a scumpost. It's very tonally off, has a lot of the read minimization I see in scum often, and to top it off the reason for it seems totally made up.
And yeah this is along the same lines. I think I talked about this earlier but basically it's like a strange scumread on profii except she hesitates to really scumread profii properly. Like, duckling, you remember Rei in 1791 right? This is like that, scum trying to look uninformed imo.
In post 464, Skygazer wrote:That's a lot to take in. Some thoughts:
Reevaluated my read on Rask, I think my logic was flawed as people have pointed out.
UNVOTE:
Getting townvibes from brass and elbirn. Magna's frustration towards spam posters seems genuine and town.
Not sure if Gustavo would act so belligerent if he were scum, wouldn't scum want to avoid drawing that kind of attention?
In post 431, HitAlt wrote:I need to get to posting so that I'm above that 20 post mark.
I'd hate to be under any scrutiny.
This pings me slightly, unless this was just a joke?
Still trying to internalize everything that just happened and I haven't really had many chances to interact with people so I feel pretty behind.
I might just be tunneling at this point? but I sorta dislike the backtracking @ rask and most other things about this post. Like, nothing here is really AI. Magna not liking spamposting is a position either alignment can hold and idk how town gets this read. Gustavo read is a bit more understandable but like that's just playstyle anyway. Even if you think Hitalt's joke is serious, how in the world can that only "ping you a bit"?
In post 528, Skygazer wrote: In post 524, HeWhoSwims wrote:Well you can try no
Why are dave and chickadee sscum? you seem to imply they are.
I pointed it out specifically to try and respond, and it's worked so far because I got brass to explain his read.
I wasn't really satisfied to dave's answer in
459 and his response to t_w's question in
471 is also unsatisfying. He doesn't explain why he would be satisfied with that answer, it's just a straight matter-of-fact yes which kind of pings me. It reads like he doesn't even want to clarify his point. Also
85 seems like safe fence-sitting fluff but that's been pointed out and it was so long ago.
I feel like chickadee has less content than me and I've been lurking pretty hard by this point so that's pretty sus but she could also just be in the same situation I've been in.
Read in chick for lurking by someone who had kinda been lurking is v meh. I did that in my first scumgame iirc and so did Myloninja.
In post 586, Skygazer wrote: In post 530, profii wrote:sky- I didn’t like that unvote but I appreciate not everyone has loads of time - I certainly avoid games any bigger than this because I am not sharp enough to keep up properly so I’d like to say to sky please provide 3 scum reads and why
Three top scumreads for the moment, in order:
dave's slot, as I've already discussed
Ausuka for sheeping/hopping onto wagons, lack of reads, lack of reasonings, etc. I said earlier that I think there's at least one opportunistic scum on my wagon and I think this is the most likely option in regards to that.
Flubber, I don't like how he jumped on chickadee for "PT-slipping" when it's clearly stated in the rules, and there's the whole "coasting" post that Magna pointed out
I lost my grasp on the chickadee scumread after rereading her and seeing more content than I remembered and I like her most recent interaction/vote on flubber.
In post 569, xyzzy wrote:Skygazer, can you point to any specific Elbirn posts that have you town reading him?
22,
75,
77 and
79 feel like he's genuinely trying to create content early on. I don't really get how people are scumreading these for being pushy when the pushiness was useful in helping us get out of rvs.
125 doesn't have game content but I'm reading it as relaxed/carefree which is a towntell imo. I also like
507.
read on me is ??? because I was first on her wagon and gave reasoning for it. Again, don't see how this read is real.
In post 587, Skygazer wrote:Strong townreads so far in order: brass, MoI, Andrius, and elbirn
brass has lots of good content which imo definitely outweighs the fluff, and I like the fact that he's genuinely trying to keep his fluff posting down now
MoI continues to post good content and I like their reads for the most part
I like Andrius's
570 and like I stated earlier I don't see gus's behavior coming from scum
I talked about elbirn in my last post
I would consider this to be a bad townpool although tbf this isn't really scummy but these players are worth looking at if Sky does red.
In post 927, Skygazer wrote: In post 895, Raskolnikov wrote:@Skygazer want readlist from you, also response to flubber answers you said you were waiting for
Response to flubber is above.
Readlist
Strong Town
Magna
Andrius
Elbirn
xyzzx
brass
Town Lean
profii
Rask
Inferno
Ausuka - has some good posts, I'm just offput by her tunnelling of me
I Don't Know How To Sort These Players To Be Quite Honest
dram
the_worst
Taly - dave was scummy, Taly has made some good posts since he's been here tho
Chickadee
Scum Lean
HeWhoSwims - I don't like
832 where he has like six different scumreads he's willing to vote for
Strong Scum
flubber
HitAlt
Very bad readslist imo, especially the strong scum section. Flubber and hitalt scumpool is very convenient. She also never really attempts to sort dram at all.
In post 963, Skygazer wrote: In post 956, Ausuka wrote:
This also seems fake to me? Like, tonereading as x alignment is normal. The fact that Sky talked about tonereading it as a quality (defensiveness) and added "a bit" to soften it makes it look faked.
Not sure what you mean about tonereading as a quality? I can say that that wasn't meant to soften anything, more to point out that profii wasn't being full blown defensive, just a bit. In hindsight though it just looks like he was trying to get information out of Gus which is NAI to me.
In post 981, Skygazer wrote:Don't like that last series of flubber posts (
975 to
978).
HitAlt's
979 is flaily enough for me to keep my current vote for now, though.
More flubber and hitalt pushing???
also, i don't really see the "a bit" defensive thing?
at this point I realized I had bitten off more than I could chew and stopped quoting things