A Story Revisited (Anything uPick): Day 6

Lady Angel · Post Post #500 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:00 am

How are people getting items on day 1 in a game with daystart? That's the weird part to me about Chickadee's role.

Invisibility · Post Post #501 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:02 am

Nero Cain · Post Post #502 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:03 am

a day insert role that sends things is not some impossibility.

Is that your total catchup?

Chickadee · Post Post #503 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:06 am

I can send things as often as I want to as many players as I want. But there’s another layer to it as well. So you may or may not like getting something from me.

Nero Cain · Post Post #504 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:09 am

Friendly Neighbor by day, Serial killer by night.

Chickadee · Post Post #505 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:37 am

In post 504, Nero Cain wrote:Friendly Neighbor by day, Serial killer by night.

False on both accounts

Nero Cain · Post Post #506 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:39 am

Wasn't trying to guess your role, was just trying to be funny.

Nosferatu · Post Post #507 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:43 am

In post 488, Rylai and Lina wrote:obviously ~Sora

pause

first off

who is sora if the hydra is specifically rylai and lina??

jjh927 · Post Post #508 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:49 am

In post 73, Rylai and Lina wrote:So for all purposes Rylai = Frozen Angel = Sora

and Lina = Shiro = Shiro

~Sora

jjh927 · Post Post #509 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:49 am

Invisibility · Post Post #510 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:50 am

In post 505, Chickadee wrote:
In post 504, Nero Cain wrote:Friendly Neighbor by day, Serial killer by night.
False on both accounts

ew

Innocent Children · Post Post #511 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:38 am

In post 484, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 475, Innocent Children wrote:P.edit. That’s why I’m thinking that she is extremely unlikely to be linked with anyone she sent PMs to.
I think it is probably town indicative, though mildly dismaying, that ICs is revealing the contents of the message now

I haven’t really though, however I think it likely to be some type of crumb.

Innocent Children · Post Post #512 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:40 am

In post 485, Chickadee wrote:
In post 463, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 454, Chickadee wrote:and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch
but being lynchbait doesn't mean you can't roll scum.

Pork, its whats prodging today.
True, but you can't really look at how easily people piled on my wagon, with no explanations, and think "Yep this is the time Chick rolls scum"
In post 466, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 454, Chickadee wrote:Vax, I'm thunking you rolled scum here.

Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
Chick, why is your RVS vote still on me? I should ask Lady Angel the same thing. Lol
Because I never bothered to take it off.

UNVOTE:

Why does it bother you? You were nowhere near lynch.

If you're asking specifically why I'm not voting tax instead, I'd like to interact with him a bit.

Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.

Innocent Children · Post Post #513 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:43 am

In post 489, Ginngie wrote:I got Barbie girl from chick

Don’t really understand why that means anything

Interesting, perhaps her gifts correlate with trust levels? Mine was a lot more helpful.

Innocent Children · Post Post #514 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:46 am

In post 499, jjh927 wrote:I don't understand why anyone would think a good shot would be possible at this stage of the game anyway ngl

I agree. I also think it’s a bad idea to alignment - particularly scumlock anyone on D1.

Innocent Children · Post Post #515 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:50 am

In post 503, Chickadee wrote:I can send things as often as I want to as many players as I want.
But there’s another layer to it as well. So you may or may not like getting something from me.

Interesting. I guess that should become more and more obvious as more and more people receive “gifts” from you, I guess.

Chickadee · Post Post #516 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:52 am

In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.

No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.

Innocent Children · Post Post #517 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 12:01 pm

In post 516, Chickadee wrote:
In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.

I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.

Curiositity does not necessarily = being concerned.

Speaking of, Nero’s point about Vax not having much of a reaction to votes, is making me wonder about that too. Your take?

Innocent Children · Post Post #518 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 12:06 pm

In post 515, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 503, Chickadee wrote:I can send things as often as I want to as many players as I want.
But there’s another layer to it as well. So you may or may not like getting something from me.
Interesting. I guess that should become more and more obvious as more and more people receive “gifts” from you, I guess.

In post 513, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 489, Ginngie wrote:I got Barbie girl from chick

Don’t really understand why that means anything
Interesting, perhaps her gifts correlate with trust levels? Mine was a lot more helpful.

I’m not sure as to why someone would or wouldn’t like your gift. Would that be more likely to be intentional on your part or more open to interpretation on the part of the recipient?

Nosferatu · Post Post #519 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 12:07 pm

how many people are on vax rn

Ginngie · Post Post #520 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 1:04 pm

In post 517, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 516, Chickadee wrote:
In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.
I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.

Curiositity does not necessarily = being concerned.

Speaking of, Nero’s point about Vax not having much of a reaction to votes, is making me wonder about that too. Your take?

innocent children

Ginngie · Post Post #521 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 1:04 pm

VOTE: innocent children even

Innocent Children · Post Post #522 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 1:59 pm

In post 521, Ginngie wrote:VOTE: innocent children even

Why?

Innocent Children · Post Post #523 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 2:04 pm

In post 520, Ginngie wrote:
In post 517, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 516, Chickadee wrote:
In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.
I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.

Curiositity does not necessarily = being concerned.

Speaking of, Nero’s point about Vax not having much of a reaction to votes, is making me wonder about that too. Your take?
innocent children

In post 521, Ginngie wrote:VOTE: innocent children even

In post 522, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 521, Ginngie wrote:VOTE: innocent children even
Why?

Not a valid answer.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #524 (ISO) » Thu Sep 13, 2018 2:39 pm

annie