Why do so many people whine about being mislynch bait?
dislike this post also on page 28
Why would that be scummy?
In post 748, mastina wrote:Because different people not posting means different things for those different people.
Sure but it was early game and I felt like it was too early to differentiate between scum that was lurking and players that just hadn't posted yet.
In post 761, Gamma Emerald wrote:Screw you, I was working on a wall post when the topic got locked and now I have to redo it
y r u always so angry?
W4at
-If Mastina is outted scum then why isn't your vote there?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Idk why I’m always so angry
Maybe it’s just the easiest emotion to express
Tbh I do have irl anger issues so that could be it too
PEdit: Wheme’s reads may be bad but imo they’re Town indicative
Don’t like that you tried to shoot my read down implicitly there
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
Why do so many people whine about being mislynch bait?
dislike this post also on page 28
Why would that be scummy?
dismissing what was actually not that bad a post in a vacuum
actually wait what was the case
eh nah i still think you're town but it wasnt like dismissing the point in a way that was like actually good? like actually with a real counterpoint
"invisibility is actually braindead" -- RadiantCowbells
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 806, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also @Nero I think mastina is right about inactivity meaning different things for different people, like my Wh4t scumread shows.
I absolutely agree. I'm just saying that in such an early phase of the game differentiating between scum that's lurking and town that just hasn't posted yet seems like a futile endeavor.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 780, mastina wrote:You, as town. Having a modifier that helps you when gladiated.
Is evidence corroborating my claim. Of being unable to gladiate anyone except for town.
Because if you are town.
And I am town.
I could only succeed when using it on you.
A townie having a gladiator modifier may make your claim legit but it on no way confirms you as town.
I don't recall stating it confirmed me as town.
I said it confirmed my role is what I claimed it to be.
Who's the one stretching now, mate?
It's implicit when you say your role only works if you're both town.
I read your wall and it's pretty meh. I still don't understand how your read has "drastically changed"?
In post 800, Nero Cain wrote:W4at-If Mastina is outted scum then why isn't your vote there?
Because I like where my vote is currently, on you no less. And I'm dramatic in my pushing but I am more concerned with determining her alignment before changing my vote.