how good is vonflare at laser tag [game over]

chamber · Post Post #825 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:22 pm

I actually think saying as much as I did there gives enough away that I can just say.

'look for the other 4... and try to lynch one of them instead'
'look for the other 4... because I don't think pairings with me make sense'

chamber · Post Post #826 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:38 pm

Your turn. What motivation do you attribute to me asking that question if I don't have multiple valid interpretations?

chamber · Post Post #827 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:54 pm

In post 650, Pure Sadness wrote:Ok, VOTE: Alchemist21

It's not L-1 then.

This post is pretty odd
Didn't realize it at the time.

MariaR · Post Post #828 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:55 pm

Glad you agree

chamber · Post Post #829 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2018 7:39 pm

Over that specific post? If so what is the odd thing you agree with me about?

Invisibility · Post Post #830 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:34 am

titus vote alch

Majiffy · Post Post #831 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:53 am

No Alch looks town vote elsewhere. Like Gamma!

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #832 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:00 am

In post 826, chamber wrote:Your turn. What motivation do you attribute to me asking that question if I don't have multiple valid interpretations?

You trying to feign ignorance? Why do you think I didn’t have a reason?

Chickadee · Post Post #833 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:25 am

In post 821, chamber wrote:
In post 765, Chickadee wrote:and try to work out the other 4.
If you are still around, can you elaborate on what you meant here.

I was being a bit trolly. I was meaning I'm not scum, so look elsewhere. I guess I just didn't word it very great.

But I do like your way of thinking about pairings making sense or not.

Titus · Post Post #834 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:20 am

In post 830, Invisibility wrote:titus vote alch

In post 831, Majiffy wrote:No Alch looks town vote elsewhere. Like Gamma!

Why

Irrelephant11 · Post Post #835 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:32 am

Catching up here soon. Anyone want to tell me what I missed/talk about it?

pedit: hi titus are you scum

Majiffy · Post Post #836 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:35 am

In post 834, Titus wrote:
In post 830, Invisibility wrote:titus vote alch

In post 831, Majiffy wrote:No Alch looks town vote elsewhere. Like Gamma!
Why

Alch was lead (and unopposed) wagon at like L-2 with no real viable CWs around. Reaction to such came off very town

MariaR · Post Post #837 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:08 am

In post 829, chamber wrote:Over that specific post? If so what is the odd thing you agree with me about?

The pure sadness vote was really really bad.

Pure Sadness · Post Post #838 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:42 am

In post 835, Irrelephant11 wrote:Catching up here soon. Anyone want to tell me what I missed/talk about it?

pedit: hi titus are you scum

chamber didn't answer questions, people are voting majiffy.

chamber · Post Post #839 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:43 am

In post 832, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 826, chamber wrote:Your turn. What motivation do you attribute to me asking that question if I don't have multiple valid interpretations?
You trying to feign ignorance? Why do you think I didn’t have a reason?

Sometimes people are just actually ignorant. I don't understand the trajectory behind your questioning at all. If I thought you had no reason I'd have simply not answered. Now that I've answered I'm asking what it was.

In post 833, Chickadee wrote:
In post 821, chamber wrote:
In post 765, Chickadee wrote:and try to work out the other 4.
If you are still around, can you elaborate on what you meant here.
I was being a bit trolly. I was meaning I'm not scum, so look elsewhere. I guess I just didn't word it very great.

But I do like your way of thinking about pairings making sense or not.

I think the 'other 4' language used by you and jiffy is extremely scummy in this game. Asking people to compromise is how we end up lynching town. No in is going to be 5 for 5 on day 1 (at least not with any consistency).

In post 837, MariaR wrote:
In post 829, chamber wrote:Over that specific post? If so what is the odd thing you agree with me about?
The pure sadness vote was really really bad.

It's not the vote that bothered me. Is it only the vote that bothered you?

chamber · Post Post #840 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:45 am

In post 838, Pure Sadness wrote:
In post 835, Irrelephant11 wrote:Catching up here soon. Anyone want to tell me what I missed/talk about it?

pedit: hi titus are you scum
chamber didn't answer questions, people are voting majiffy.

You don't have anything else to add?

Irrelephant11 · Post Post #841 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:53 am

In post 838, Pure Sadness wrote:
In post 835, Irrelephant11 wrote:Catching up here soon. Anyone want to tell me what I missed/talk about it?

pedit: hi titus are you scum
chamber didn't answer questions, people are voting majiffy.

hmm.
should I vote majiffy?

xyzzy · Post Post #842 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:57 am

PenguinPower has been prodded.

MariaR · Post Post #843 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:07 am

In post 839, chamber wrote:It's not the vote that bothered me. Is it only the vote that bothered you?

The vote and the fact they barely said anything about said vote along with the shit Iso is just bad.

Invisibility · Post Post #844 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:18 am

In post 834, Titus wrote:
In post 830, Invisibility wrote:titus vote alch

In post 831, Majiffy wrote:No Alch looks town vote elsewhere. Like Gamma!
Why

alch called me scum for voting him in the wagon while i thought he was scum
persistently dislikes me
claims that the scum are ignoring me intentionally for the infinite times scummy thing ive done
can you see how dumb this argument is
also other things lemme find them

oh yeah
attempted to not be able to talk to someone

In post 400, Alchemist21 wrote:Because there’s still a chance your scum and I don’t care to spend the energy arguing with you when

A) You’re still just one vote

B) If you’re Town you might realize your mistake later on anyway

C) If you’re scum I don’t even have to get you lynched because you’ll always be tied to some teammate

So there’s no scenario where it’s really worth it to me. It’s just a waste of my energy.

like as in not talking ever
as ni ainee
as in making an excuse to not argue

i mean look at his iso stuff with make sense its not that long of a read

chamber · Post Post #845 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:31 am

In post 844, Invisibility wrote:alch called me scum for voting him in the wagon while i thought he was scum

Your vote on him is easily among the worst votes made this game. Can town not find those voting them suspicious? Nonsense.

Invisibility · Post Post #846 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:34 am

i guess but he continued to harp on it and also the thing with the the the thing andd dand nananan the thing with thing tfhe scum not looking at me or soemthgine

Chickadee · Post Post #847 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:42 am

In post 839, chamber wrote:I think the 'other 4' language used by you and jiffy is extremely scummy in this game. Asking people to compromise is how we end up lynching town. No in is going to be 5 for 5 on day 1 (at least not with any consistency).

Fair.

I've seen people call entire scum teams, and have done so myself on D1 though. It's not impossible. With 5 scum though, I find it hard to believe people don't have lynch pools. I see tunnels, but no pools. Admittedly I haven't read a good chunk of this game, because a lot happened when I couldn't get to it. So please correct me if I'm wrong.

chamber · Post Post #848 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:44 am

Thats my point. This game highly encourages tunneling from the town. You are encouraging a pool type of play with your comment.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #849 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:03 am

In post 837, MariaR wrote:
In post 829, chamber wrote:Over that specific post? If so what is the odd thing you agree with me about?
The pure sadness vote was really really bad.

You wanna vote Sadness with me? I think Jiffy’s Town.

VOTE: Pure Sadness